"Kurgan Gringioni" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...
Quoted message said:"Ronaldo Jeremiah" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:"Kurgan Gringioni" <[email hidden]> wrote in
message news:<[email hidden]>...
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:> -snip-
>
> Dumbass:
>
> He can say that because GH doesn't win races. Those other guys sometimes win.
Well, there's the inagural SF Grand Prix and 2001 Ghent-Wevelgem.
Even a blind squirrel finds a nut once in a while.
Winning Ghent-Wevelgem to winning the WC is a much smaller jump than winning the North American
pro series to WC. Look at the difference in who they're racing against, for starters.
Franco Ballerini would agree with me. read this:
cyclingnews.comnewsOpen ↗
What, Kurgan, no 'dumbass' for me that time? You must like me.
Of course I agree with you about GW being more similar to World's than any North American race or
series. The blind squirrel remark just emphasizes the point I have been making all along - GH wins
no more races than you would expect him to if his results were generated totally by chance. Super
strong cyclist? Yup. Experienced? Without a doubt. Winner?
Uh, no. Riding hundreds of races and winning two doesn't mean much. Chris Horner would've won more
than GH has riding in Europe, had his career there lasted longer. That doesn't mean he'd be as good
as GH at what GH does best (carthorse), just that he'd win more than two races out of the hundreds
that he'd ride.
I'd place a bet on GH to place in the top ten, but never for him to win. Horner, I'd buy a win
ticket (if the odds were sufficiently long).
-RJ