"Killfiles".

Lee Michaels said:

"Charles" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Lee Michaels said:

"Charles" <[email hidden]> wrote >
> You make some good points David, which of course he won't be able to
> address because he *is* a "troll" and simply won't admit it.

Chucky makes the above remarks as he wonce again changes his addy.

Which chucky isn't smart (or mentally stable) enough to understand, is
typical troll behavior.

If there is anymore of your repeated "trolling" William, I may have to
seriously consider allegedly "killfiling" you. ;o)

Poor chucky. He is losing his mind. He is beginning to confuse various
individuals with one another. Early onset dementia??

Don't tell me you have chosen to forget your likeness to Richmal
Crompton's Just William, particularly as I drew it to your attention
on so many occasions.

But then you never were very clever were you? And do you realise that
you are "trolling" again?

JMW said:

Lee Michaels said:

And, in case you are too dense to understand, there is little constructive
activity taking place when certain folks post here. The simple way to handle
it is just to killfile. But chucky just keeps changing his addy. He has
changed it already in this thread. Because he can't stand the idea that I
would not read him. Apparently he is obsessed with me.

I'm working on it, Lee. If he's the only one around here that still
uses the Berlin server, I may have an answer.

Your getting desperate Williams, but you must be delighted to have
your little thick buddy back to support you. What was it now, the
symbiotic pairing?

Lee Michaels said:

"JMW" <[email hidden]> wrote

Quoted message said:

Lee Michaels said:

And, in case you are too dense to understand, there is little constructive
activity taking place when certain folks post here. The simple way to
handle
it is just to killfile. But chucky just keeps changing his addy. He has
changed it already in this thread. Because he can't stand the idea that I
would not read him. Apparently he is obsessed with me.

I'm working on it, Lee. If he's the only one around here that still
uses the Berlin server, I may have an answer.

Thank you John.

I think that Dally is using the individual.net server.

Oooops, you'll have to get all the clique to use the same server (and
then so will all the "trolls"😉.

I don't mind having a few different servers on the go if it will give
Williams the [censored]. ;o)

JMW said:

It looks like Davidson and Hudson are getting a bit anxious over the
fact that someone might finally circumvent their constant ID morphing.

Not at all jerkoff. You see you will fail in this endevor (sp), as you
have everything else in your life. As long as just ONE person quotes
me, you will fail. I suspect even Charles, or a few others will do so
just to spite you.

Charles said:

Hallo Donovan, still smarting because I wouldn't replace your rather
unflattering photo on my web site, with the more glamorous one you
wanted?

He's an ugly [censored] no matter which photo you use. Imagine someone that
ugly actually putting up a pic of themselves? My god, he looks like
Heathers butt after a long night of pounding by my 14"er.

JMW said:

Lee Michaels said:

"JMW" <[email hidden]> wrote

Quoted message said:

"Lee Michaels" <[email hidden]> wrote:
>
>And, in case you are too dense to understand, there is little constructive
>activity taking place when certain folks post here. The simple way to
>handle
>it is just to killfile. But chucky just keeps changing his addy. He has
>changed it already in this thread. Because he can't stand the idea that I
>would not read him. Apparently he is obsessed with me.

I'm working on it, Lee. If he's the only one around here that still
uses the Berlin server, I may have an answer.

Thank you John.

I think that Dally is using the individual.net server.

Yes. I just checked. But there's a workaround. She uses Mozilla;
Hudson uses Agent. It can still be done.

Sure it can John Boy, are you having a great time?

What if I just use my Outlook Express account, which is all set up,
with my alternatives servers?

This is going to be so much fun, and will give me a chance to hone my
skills.

JMW said:

Rizzo said:

JMW said:

I'm working on it, Lee.

Between masturbation sessions?

It looks like Davidson and Hudson are getting a bit anxious over the
fact that someone might finally circumvent their constant ID morphing.

I can't speak for other people but I look forward to your
circumvention with great anticipation.

And for the record I haven't morphed ID's for a number of years, as
you well know. However, it *is* time that Charles PONSONBY Esq and Don
Quixote had worthy successors, so let the games begin johnny.

JMW said:

Lee Michaels said:

And, in case you are too dense to understand, there is little constructive
activity taking place when certain folks post here. The simple way to handle
it is just to killfile. But chucky just keeps changing his addy. He has
changed it already in this thread. Because he can't stand the idea that I
would not read him. Apparently he is obsessed with me.

I'm working on it, Lee. If he's the only one around here that still
uses the Berlin server, I may have an answer.

Why is this so hard? Surely I can't be the only one here who's managed
to figure out how to keep these asswads killfiled?

"The Queen of Cans and Jars" teased

Quoted message said:

JMW said:

Lee Michaels said:

And, in case you are too dense to understand, there is little
constructive
activity taking place when certain folks post here. The simple way to
handle
it is just to killfile. But chucky just keeps changing his addy. He has
changed it already in this thread. Because he can't stand the idea that
I
would not read him. Apparently he is obsessed with me.

I'm working on it, Lee. If he's the only one around here that still
uses the Berlin server, I may have an answer.

Why is this so hard? Surely I can't be the only one here who's managed
to figure out how to keep these asswads killfiled?

Maybe cuz us hamfisted guys just don't have your sweet, sensitve girly
touch??

On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 14:15:44 GMT, [email hidden] (The Queen of

Cans and Jars) said:

JMW said:

Lee Michaels said:

And, in case you are too dense to understand, there is little constructive
activity taking place when certain folks post here. The simple way to handle
it is just to killfile. But chucky just keeps changing his addy. He has
changed it already in this thread. Because he can't stand the idea that I
would not read him. Apparently he is obsessed with me.

I'm working on it, Lee. If he's the only one around here that still
uses the Berlin server, I may have an answer.

Why is this so hard? Surely I can't be the only one here who's managed
to figure out how to keep these asswads killfiled?

They all say that Queenie, but how can you prove you're not watching
every post with eager anticipation?

Lee Michaels said:

"The Queen of Cans and Jars" teased

Quoted message said:

JMW said:

"Lee Michaels" <[email hidden]> wrote:
>
>And, in case you are too dense to understand, there is little
>constructive activity taking place when certain folks post here. The
>simple way to handle it is just to killfile. But chucky just keeps
>changing his addy. He has changed it already in this thread. Because
>he can't stand the idea that I would not read him. Apparently he is
>obsessed with me.

I'm working on it, Lee. If he's the only one around here that still
uses the Berlin server, I may have an answer.

Why is this so hard? Surely I can't be the only one here who's managed
to figure out how to keep these asswads killfiled?

Maybe cuz us hamfisted guys just don't have your sweet, sensitve girly
touch??

Nah, it's probably because my silly old Mac-only newsreader actually has
a very functional and efficient killfile system.

In any case, I find the group perfectly readable if somewhat short on
content at the moment. I hope that the people who post good-to-read
things will sort out their killfiles and keep posting.

Charles said:

Donovan Rebbechi said:

Charles said:

While Williams beavers away trying to find the definitive "killfile"
criteria, in another attempt to disbar his enemies from MFW, a task
in which I suspect he is likely to find only limited success, let us
look again at my views on "killfiling":

nah, let's not

My goodness, another one emerges from lurkdom. Just as soon as I start
posting again, the Group becomes alive again.

Hallo Donovan, still smarting because I wouldn't replace your rather
unflattering photo on my web site, with the more glamorous one you
wanted?

Oooh, a troll. Very impressive. Have a nice day (-;
--
Donovan Rebbechi
http://pegasus.rutgers.edu/~elflord/

On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 15:32:38 GMT, [email hidden] (The Queen of

Cans and Jars) said:

Lee Michaels said:

"The Queen of Cans and Jars" teased

Quoted message said:

JMW <[email hidden]> wrote:

> "Lee Michaels" <[email hidden]> wrote:
> >
> >And, in case you are too dense to understand, there is little
> >constructive activity taking place when certain folks post here. The
> >simple way to handle it is just to killfile. But chucky just keeps
> >changing his addy. He has changed it already in this thread. Because
> >he can't stand the idea that I would not read him. Apparently he is
> >obsessed with me.
>
> I'm working on it, Lee. If he's the only one around here that still
> uses the Berlin server, I may have an answer.

Why is this so hard? Surely I can't be the only one here who's managed
to figure out how to keep these asswads killfiled?

Maybe cuz us hamfisted guys just don't have your sweet, sensitve girly
touch??

Nah, it's probably because my silly old Mac-only newsreader actually has
a very functional and efficient killfile system.

In any case, I find the group perfectly readable if somewhat short on
content at the moment. I hope that the people who post good-to-read
things will sort out their killfiles and keep posting.

So do I, this is so much fun again. ;o)

Quoted message said:

Donovan Rebbechi said:

Charles said:

Donovan Rebbechi said:

On 2005-11-29, Charles <[email hidden]> wrote:
> While Williams beavers away trying to find the definitive "killfile"
> criteria, in another attempt to disbar his enemies from MFW, a task
> in which I suspect he is likely to find only limited success, let us
> look again at my views on "killfiling":

nah, let's not

My goodness, another one emerges from lurkdom. Just as soon as I start
posting again, the Group becomes alive again.

Hallo Donovan, still smarting because I wouldn't replace your rather
unflattering photo on my web site, with the more glamorous one you
wanted?

Oooh, a troll. Very impressive. Have a nice day (-;

You troll me, and I troll you back = I'm a troll?

I always have a nice day Donovan, how are you these days mate? ;o)

"Charles" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Donovan Rebbechi said:

Charles said:

On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 12:21:52 +0000 (UTC), Donovan Rebbechi
<[email hidden]> wrote:

>On 2005-11-29, Charles <[email hidden]> wrote:
>> While Williams beavers away trying to find the definitive "killfile"
>> criteria, in another attempt to disbar his enemies from MFW, a task
>> in which I suspect he is likely to find only limited success, let us
>> look again at my views on "killfiling":
>
>nah, let's not

My goodness, another one emerges from lurkdom. Just as soon as I start
posting again, the Group becomes alive again.

Hallo Donovan, still smarting because I wouldn't replace your rather
unflattering photo on my web site, with the more glamorous one you
wanted?

Oooh, a troll. Very impressive. Have a nice day (-;

You troll me, and I troll you back = I'm a troll?

I always have a nice day Donovan, how are you these days mate? ;o)

I think Donovan has simply been out-trolled. He didn't even clear leather.

On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 09:21:20 +0000, Charles <[email hidden]> wrote:

OK, so no one really has you killfiled. We're all secretly hanging on
your every word.

So now will you stop changing your address every five minutes you
nutjob?

Ellis

In article <[email hidden]>,

(The Queen of Cans and Jars) said:

Lee Michaels said:

"The Queen of Cans and Jars" teased

Quoted message said:

JMW <[email hidden]> wrote:

> "Lee Michaels" <[email hidden]> wrote:
> >
> >And, in case you are too dense to understand, there is little
> >constructive activity taking place when certain folks post here. The
> >simple way to handle it is just to killfile. But chucky just keeps
> >changing his addy. He has changed it already in this thread. Because
> >he can't stand the idea that I would not read him. Apparently he is
> >obsessed with me.
>
> I'm working on it, Lee. If he's the only one around here that still
> uses the Berlin server, I may have an answer.

Why is this so hard? Surely I can't be the only one here who's managed
to figure out how to keep these asswads killfiled?

Maybe cuz us hamfisted guys just don't have your sweet, sensitve girly
touch??

Nah, it's probably because my silly old Mac-only newsreader actually has
a very functional and efficient killfile system.

In any case, I find the group perfectly readable if somewhat short on
content at the moment. I hope that the people who post good-to-read
things will sort out their killfiles and keep posting.

NewsWatcher?

--
Keith

Ellis said:

On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 09:21:20 +0000, Charles <[email hidden]> wrote:

OK, so no one really has you killfiled. We're all secretly hanging on
your every word.

I always knew that, but it is tremendously satisfying to have it
confirmed by a not "troll".

Quoted message said:

So now will you stop changing your address every five minutes you
nutjob?

I was thinking for a moment, how nice to hear from Ellis after all
this time, and then you went and spoiled it.

Why does my email address so bother some of you? When I used to post
in my own name and used my real email address, I was inundated with
the most foul filth imaginable, obviously constructed by some very
sick people here.

Even Keith who is everyone''s chum, had the same problem, and you ask
me why I keep changing it? There are other reasons, which are more
than obvious, but none of them are to do with evading "killfiles",
because I don't give a [censored] whether you "killfile" me or not. All the
rest of my input remains exactly the same, so *really* "killfiling" me
should be relatively simple.

Now when Williams comes up with his master plan to exclude me from the
Group, that will be a different matter, and I will be only too pleased
to make him look the pratt he really is, by successfully evading his
attempts at regaining control of the Group.

(The Queen of Cans and Jars) said:

JMW said:

Lee Michaels said:

And, in case you are too dense to understand, there is little constructive
activity taking place when certain folks post here. The simple way to handle
it is just to killfile. But chucky just keeps changing his addy. He has
changed it already in this thread. Because he can't stand the idea that I
would not read him. Apparently he is obsessed with me.

I'm working on it, Lee. If he's the only one around here that still
uses the Berlin server, I may have an answer.

Why is this so hard? Surely I can't be the only one here who's managed
to figure out how to keep these asswads killfiled?

By constantly adding each new nym?

"Charles" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

While Williams beavers away trying to find the definitive "killfile"
criteria, in another attempt to disbar his enemies from MFW, a task
in which I suspect he is likely to find only limited success, let us
look again at my views on "killfiling":

What is the point of killfiles? If you don't want to read someone's
contributions, just ignore them and pass on by. Williams has always
proudly proclaimed that he has never "killfiled" anyone.

Genuine "killfiling" (if there is such a thing) must be like a mole
burrowing underground, oblivious to what is going on other than on its
own chosen course. The "killfiles" may delete the offending posters
from the killfilers in-box, but they remain in all other posts in any
particular thread and are therefore always highly visible, unless you
"killfile" the thread or extend the "killfiling" to all respondents.

The use of "killfiles" is normally the defensive reaction of some
would-be stroppy [censored], who has given another contributor the [censored],
got more than he bargained for and decides to run for cover. That way
he can make out he can't see what his former antagonist is saying, and
therefore (he thinks) he is honourably excused from all further
response.

The truth of the matter is that most killfilers don't actually
"killfile" anyone. They are terrified of missing something so they
read everything but then think they have a good excuse not to respond.
In a nutshell, "killfiles" are nothing more or less than an alleged
hiding place for the faint of heart.

So in a nutshell, whatever Williams comes up with, MFW will remain
pretty much as it always has. The exception may be that those who want
to play Williams' little game, will simply talk only to each other and
proclaim how wonderful Williams is, and how nice it is to be rid of
the "trolls"

Remember where you heard it first. ;o)

This dribble doesn't make you less of a schmuck.