In article <[email hidden]>
Peter Boulton peter@data*no-spam*perceptions.co.uk said:I'm about to buy a bike for my 9 year old daughter over the net. Her inside
leg measurement is 22" (inches). I reckon she needs 24" wheels, yes?
I see that most of the frame sizes are quoted as 13", but there are some
bikes with 24" wheels which are quoted with a variety of frame sizes.
Guess my question is, 22" inside leg / 9 years old = 24" wheels + 13"
frame - right or wrong? If wrong, how do I get from inside leg to frame
size?
As far as rules of thumb go she should be fine on a 13" frame 24" wheel,
but there's more to it than that -
Style of frame: if the top-tube is close to the top of the seatpost then
a 13" frame with a 9" bottom-bracket height means there's very little
standover clearance.
Length of frame: the saddle height is easily adjustable, but the reach
to the handlebars is fixed - too long and it won't be easy to control,
too short and it won't give much room for growing.
Length of cranks: there's no point being able to put the seat low enough
for safety/comfort if she can't pedal properly because her knees come up
too far.
Quoted message said:
Obviously I'm hoping to buy a bike which is safe for her now but which will
also last as she grows.
A 24" wheel mountainbike style machine should be useable until she's
over 5' tall, although you'll probably need to fit a longer seatpost.
The only way you can really tell, though, is to sit her on some bikes
and see how it looks/feels - don't forget to get her to pedal backwards
so you can see how high her knees go, and to steer so you can see if
she's overstretched when turning the bars.