jbuch <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...
Quoted message said:Pete said:Does a pink ketostix result mean that you are losing weight? Although I
can also imagine that if you were eating way way too much non
carbohydrate foods you could potentially be in ketosis but also be
putting on weight. Is my thinking about this correct? And if so, does
that mean therefore that ketosis is indication of having consumed too
few carbs such that if your general food intake was moderate, you would
lose weight?
Try this.
You eat only FAT. No carbs, no protein.
You would be in ketosis. You may, or may not, lose weight.
You eat 3,000 calories of fat per day.
You would be in ketosis and you would gain a lot of weight.
3,000 cals of fat and 100 gms per day of protein. You still stay in
ketosis and then still gain weight.
2,000 cals of fat and 100 grams of protein (400 calories) and no carbs,
and you are still in ketosis and probably gain weight.
500 calories of fat and 100 grams of protein (400 calories) and no
carbs, and you are still in ketosis and almost certainly lose weight.
You can be in ketosis and still get fat if the calorie intake is excessive.
Jim
Did you actually try that, or is there a study that actually tried
that, or are you just saying that because that is the current
"scientific" belief?
I challenge you to eat 3000 cals of fat and 100gms of protein and see
if you can gain weight or not.
I would wager that you would not gain any appreciable amount of weight
on 3000 cals and 100 gms of protein per day. Seriously, I would wager
$50 american if you do this for, lets say, four weeks and post your
weight on fitday or some other weight tracking web service.
Conversely, I would challenge anyone to eat 1200 cals per day, *all*
refined and high-GI carbs, and see if they would lose weight. Same
bet, same length of time and same tracking.
I think the calorie nonsense is just that, nonsense.
TC