General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Keith, squat and dorsiflexion

Started by Steve Freides · · Last activity · 12 posts · 389 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
28 July 2005
Last activity
2 August 2005
Original author
Steve Freides
Posts
12
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
389
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–12 of 12
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. http://www.kbnj.com/SQ_205.wmv

    The angle isn't perfect but I think you can see how much dorsiflexion
    I'm getting or not getting - I frankly thought it was much less than
    this.

    This is a 205 lb. squat (1-1/3 times bw), narrow and turned out stance,
    with about a one-second pause at the bottom, as deep as I can take it
    and still keep my back in good shape. (I think my lower back position
    looks pretty good - y'all can tell me if you disagree.)

    It's been around a year since my first meet, which makes it around a
    year and two months since I started squatting. I'm pleased with how
    it's coming along - I've got a long way to go but I'm making solid, slow
    progress.

    -S-
    http://www.kbnj.com

  2. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Steve Freides said:

    http://www.kbnj.com/SQ_205.wmv

    The angle isn't perfect but I think you can see how much dorsiflexion
    I'm getting or not getting - I frankly thought it was much less than
    this.

    This is a 205 lb. squat (1-1/3 times bw), narrow and turned out stance,
    with about a one-second pause at the bottom, as deep as I can take it
    and still keep my back in good shape. (I think my lower back position
    looks pretty good - y'all can tell me if you disagree.)

    It's been around a year since my first meet, which makes it around a
    year and two months since I started squatting. I'm pleased with how
    it's coming along - I've got a long way to go but I'm making solid, slow
    progress.

    It looks like sufficient dorsiflexion for that type of squat.

    You are also going much deeper than you were last time I saw a clip.

    Is depth being defined by dorsiflexion, lower back rounding or simply
    bady parts hitting? (calves against hamstrings, quads against torso)

    To me it looks like depth is pretty much ATTG - that is as deep as
    possible.

    --
    Keith

  3. "Hobbes" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    Steve Freides said:

    http://www.kbnj.com/SQ_205.wmv

    The angle isn't perfect but I think you can see how much dorsiflexion
    I'm getting or not getting - I frankly thought it was much less than
    this.

    This is a 205 lb. squat (1-1/3 times bw), narrow and turned out
    stance,
    with about a one-second pause at the bottom, as deep as I can take it
    and still keep my back in good shape. (I think my lower back
    position
    looks pretty good - y'all can tell me if you disagree.)

    It's been around a year since my first meet, which makes it around a
    year and two months since I started squatting. I'm pleased with how
    it's coming along - I've got a long way to go but I'm making solid,
    slow
    progress.

    It looks like sufficient dorsiflexion for that type of squat.

    You are also going much deeper than you were last time I saw a clip.

    Music to my ears!

    Quoted message said:

    Is depth being defined by dorsiflexion, lower back rounding or simply
    bady parts hitting? (calves against hamstrings, quads against torso)

    Honestly, I don't know. A few weeks ago I felt like I was hitting ATTG
    depth, thighs on calves, but when I looked at the video, it didn't look
    that deep, so I worked on getting it deeper and definitely got lower. I
    think probably the only way to tell is to put on Oly shoes and see if I
    can go deeper - if I can, then dorsiflexion will be the limiting factor
    (assuming I understand all this right). Given how my back looks, I
    imagine I could get lower without getting into a bad place in that
    regard, and although my thighs and calves are in contact, they could be
    in contact lower down, I think.

    Quoted message said:

    To me it looks like depth is pretty much ATTG - that is as deep as
    possible.

    That's good to hear. This weight was my meet opener last time and I
    think if I do some practice _not_ going that deep as the meet
    approaches, I should be good for a new PR. I did 5 singles with that
    weight plus a bit more today; the tape was of the first rep.

    -S-
    http://www.kbnj.com

    Quoted message said:

    --
    Keith

  4. Quoted message said:

    kbnj.comSQ 205.wmv>

    Whoa! Not bad, but whose the chic you got to do the video? She has
    those kind of legs that just say "I just spent all night wide open".

  5. "I'm for it!" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    kbnj.comSQ 205.wmv>

    Whoa! Not bad, but whose the chic you got to do the video? She has
    those kind of legs that just say "I just spent all night wide open".


    yeah..who was the chic...and next time get her to swing the camera in her
    direction...hehe

  6. On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:42:56 -0400, "Steve Freides"
    <[email hidden]> wrote in misc.fitness.weights:

    Quoted message said:

    "Hobbes" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    Steve Freides said:

    http://www.kbnj.com/SQ_205.wmv

    The angle isn't perfect but I think you can see how much dorsiflexion
    I'm getting or not getting - I frankly thought it was much less than
    this.

    This is a 205 lb. squat (1-1/3 times bw), narrow and turned out
    stance,
    with about a one-second pause at the bottom, as deep as I can take it
    and still keep my back in good shape. (I think my lower back
    position
    looks pretty good - y'all can tell me if you disagree.)

    It's been around a year since my first meet, which makes it around a
    year and two months since I started squatting. I'm pleased with how
    it's coming along - I've got a long way to go but I'm making solid,
    slow
    progress.

    It looks like sufficient dorsiflexion for that type of squat.

    You are also going much deeper than you were last time I saw a clip.

    Music to my ears!

    Why? How deep below parallel doesn't really matter unless you are
    front squatting. It sounds like you are trying to go as low as you
    can possible go but I don't see why you should care. It's not like
    you are catching a clean or a [censored].

    If you want to go ATG in the back squat, just go down until you can't
    go any more and then come back up. I'm baffled by what it is you are
    trying to accomplish.

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    Is depth being defined by dorsiflexion, lower back rounding or simply
    bady parts hitting? (calves against hamstrings, quads against torso)

    Honestly, I don't know. A few weeks ago I felt like I was hitting ATTG
    depth, thighs on calves, but when I looked at the video, it didn't look
    that deep, so I worked on getting it deeper and definitely got lower. I
    think probably the only way to tell is to put on Oly shoes and see if I
    can go deeper - if I can, then dorsiflexion will be the limiting factor
    (assuming I understand all this right). Given how my back looks, I
    imagine I could get lower without getting into a bad place in that
    regard, and although my thighs and calves are in contact, they could be
    in contact lower down, I think.

    Quoted message said:

    To me it looks like depth is pretty much ATTG - that is as deep as
    possible.

    That's good to hear. This weight was my meet opener last time and I
    think if I do some practice _not_ going that deep as the meet
    approaches, I should be good for a new PR. I did 5 singles with that
    weight plus a bit more today; the tape was of the first rep.

    I think you are better off trying to hit a depth about 3/4 of an inch
    or so below parallel if you are getting ready for a meet. ATG squats
    aren't going to give you much in the way of carryover and it's more
    important to get a feel for legal depth.

  7. "John Hanson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:42:56 -0400, "Steve Freides"
    <[email hidden]> wrote in misc.fitness.weights:

    Quoted message said:

    "Hobbes" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,
    "Steve Freides" <[email hidden]> wrote:

    > http://www.kbnj.com/SQ_205.wmv
    >
    > The angle isn't perfect but I think you can see how much
    > dorsiflexion
    > I'm getting or not getting - I frankly thought it was much less
    > than
    > this.
    >
    > This is a 205 lb. squat (1-1/3 times bw), narrow and turned out
    > stance,
    > with about a one-second pause at the bottom, as deep as I can take
    > it
    > and still keep my back in good shape. (I think my lower back
    > position
    > looks pretty good - y'all can tell me if you disagree.)
    >
    > It's been around a year since my first meet, which makes it around
    > a
    > year and two months since I started squatting. I'm pleased with
    > how
    > it's coming along - I've got a long way to go but I'm making solid,
    > slow
    > progress.

    It looks like sufficient dorsiflexion for that type of squat.

    You are also going much deeper than you were last time I saw a clip.

    Music to my ears!

    Why? How deep below parallel doesn't really matter unless you are
    front squatting. It sounds like you are trying to go as low as you
    can possible go but I don't see why you should care. It's not like
    you are catching a clean or a [censored].

    If you want to go ATG in the back squat, just go down until you can't
    go any more and then come back up. I'm baffled by what it is you are
    trying to accomplish.

    How I do in a meet isn't the most important thing to me, John. I want
    to continue to post better and better numbers, but with the light
    weights I move around, I've got plenty of room to make progress for a
    while yet. 🙂 All kidding aside, all of why I got into lifting and much
    of why I stay in it has to do with keeping my bad back healthy, and I've
    come to realize that to do that, I've got to be as strong and as
    flexible as I can be. Maybe it doesn't work that way for everyone but
    that's how I feel it works for me.

    Squatting deep is part of that. I feel like I ought to be able to squat
    very deep, and if I can't, it's because I'm still not master of my body
    in the movement. What I'm trying to accomplish is, well, I think you
    get the idea by now, at least I hope you do. 🙂

    Interestingly, my squats got deeper after the DragonDoor "Unlock!"
    weekend - much to my surprise, we spent more time working on squatting
    deeply than on any other movement. Just bodyweight, but I learned a lot
    of things and got to practice them enough that I could bring some of
    them to my barbell back squat, although I don't think I could explain it
    all to anyone else.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Is depth being defined by dorsiflexion, lower back rounding or
    simply
    bady parts hitting? (calves against hamstrings, quads against torso)

    Honestly, I don't know. A few weeks ago I felt like I was hitting
    ATTG
    depth, thighs on calves, but when I looked at the video, it didn't
    look
    that deep, so I worked on getting it deeper and definitely got lower.
    I
    think probably the only way to tell is to put on Oly shoes and see if
    I
    can go deeper - if I can, then dorsiflexion will be the limiting
    factor
    (assuming I understand all this right). Given how my back looks, I
    imagine I could get lower without getting into a bad place in that
    regard, and although my thighs and calves are in contact, they could
    be
    in contact lower down, I think.

    Quoted message said:

    To me it looks like depth is pretty much ATTG - that is as deep as
    possible.

    That's good to hear. This weight was my meet opener last time and I
    think if I do some practice _not_ going that deep as the meet
    approaches, I should be good for a new PR. I did 5 singles with that
    weight plus a bit more today; the tape was of the first rep.

    I think you are better off trying to hit a depth about 3/4 of an inch
    or so below parallel if you are getting ready for a meet. ATG squats
    aren't going to give you much in the way of carryover and it's more
    important to get a feel for legal depth.

    The next meet I have is either December or January so I'm in no hurry to
    do meet-specific prep and, besides, if I can squat this way and hit a
    new PR at the meet, I might just keep squatting this way. I know this
    might sound trite but it really feels good to squat this way - great on
    the knees because of the large ROM, great on the lower back because it
    has to open up in the lumbar region without rounding, hamstrings are
    getting nicely stretched, hip flexors are getting a lot of work actively
    pulling me down into the hole as well as on the way back up - it just
    plain feels good. The more I squat this way, the more I like it, and
    the deeper I go, the better it feels.

    I know, I'm just too weird for you to figure out, but I'm happy - what
    else can I tell you? 🙂

    -S-
    http://www.kbnj.com

  8. Steve Freides said:

    http://www.kbnj.com/SQ_205.wmv

    The angle isn't perfect but I think you can see how much dorsiflexion
    I'm getting or not getting - I frankly thought it was much less than
    this.

    This is a 205 lb. squat (1-1/3 times bw), narrow and turned out stance,
    with about a one-second pause at the bottom, as deep as I can take it
    and still keep my back in good shape. (I think my lower back position
    looks pretty good - y'all can tell me if you disagree.)

    It's been around a year since my first meet, which makes it around a
    year and two months since I started squatting. I'm pleased with how
    it's coming along - I've got a long way to go but I'm making solid, slow
    progress.

    -S-
    http://www.kbnj.com

    Your knee lockout made me wince.

  9. "Nameless" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Steve Freides said:

    http://www.kbnj.com/SQ_205.wmv

    The angle isn't perfect but I think you can see how much dorsiflexion
    I'm getting or not getting - I frankly thought it was much less than
    this.

    This is a 205 lb. squat (1-1/3 times bw), narrow and turned out
    stance,
    with about a one-second pause at the bottom, as deep as I can take it
    and still keep my back in good shape. (I think my lower back position
    looks pretty good - y'all can tell me if you disagree.)

    It's been around a year since my first meet, which makes it around a
    year and two months since I started squatting. I'm pleased with how
    it's coming along - I've got a long way to go but I'm making solid,
    slow
    progress.

    -S-
    http://www.kbnj.com

    Your knee lockout made me wince.

    I lockout my knees at the top of my deadlifts - why should my squats be
    any different? At that point in the lift, the weight is light and it's
    no big deal.

    -S-
    http://www.kbnj.com

  10. Steve Freides said:

    "Nameless" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Steve Freides said:

    http://www.kbnj.com/SQ_205.wmv

    The angle isn't perfect but I think you can see how much dorsiflexion
    I'm getting or not getting - I frankly thought it was much less than
    this.

    This is a 205 lb. squat (1-1/3 times bw), narrow and turned out
    stance,
    with about a one-second pause at the bottom, as deep as I can take it
    and still keep my back in good shape. (I think my lower back position
    looks pretty good - y'all can tell me if you disagree.)

    It's been around a year since my first meet, which makes it around a
    year and two months since I started squatting. I'm pleased with how
    it's coming along - I've got a long way to go but I'm making solid,
    slow
    progress.

    -S-
    http://www.kbnj.com

    Your knee lockout made me wince.

    I lockout my knees at the top of my deadlifts - why should my squats be
    any different? At that point in the lift, the weight is light and it's
    no big deal.

    Not the lockout itself, but the speed at which you lockout the knees.
    Note the rapid back and forth oscillation of the knees at lockout.
    This is caused by the rapid transition between moving and stopping. A
    lot of the forces involved in this are being dissipated in the
    ligaments etc of your knee. If you control yourself into lockout,
    these forces are mostly taken up by the muscles intead.

    Just something to ponder.

  11. "Nameless" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Steve Freides said:

    "Nameless" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:28:31 -0400, "Steve Freides"
    <[email hidden]> wrote:

    >http://www.kbnj.com/SQ_205.wmv
    >
    >The angle isn't perfect but I think you can see how much
    >dorsiflexion
    >I'm getting or not getting - I frankly thought it was much less than
    >this.
    >
    >This is a 205 lb. squat (1-1/3 times bw), narrow and turned out
    >stance,
    >with about a one-second pause at the bottom, as deep as I can take
    >it
    >and still keep my back in good shape. (I think my lower back
    >position
    >looks pretty good - y'all can tell me if you disagree.)
    >
    >It's been around a year since my first meet, which makes it around a
    >year and two months since I started squatting. I'm pleased with how
    >it's coming along - I've got a long way to go but I'm making solid,
    >slow
    >progress.
    >
    >-S-
    >http://www.kbnj.com
    >

    Your knee lockout made me wince.

    I lockout my knees at the top of my deadlifts - why should my squats
    be
    any different? At that point in the lift, the weight is light and
    it's
    no big deal.

    Not the lockout itself, but the speed at which you lockout the knees.
    Note the rapid back and forth oscillation of the knees at lockout.
    This is caused by the rapid transition between moving and stopping. A
    lot of the forces involved in this are being dissipated in the
    ligaments etc of your knee. If you control yourself into lockout,
    these forces are mostly taken up by the muscles intead.

    Whatever you're looking at, I assure you I'm in complete control of it -
    and my knees are fine.

    Quoted message said:

    Just something to ponder.

    OK.

    -S-
    http://www.kbnj.com

  12. yeah, that "snap" isn't doing you any good.

    Quoted message said:


    Your knee lockout made me wince.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.