Road Cycling · Public discussion

JT v. Danny Callen

Started by MagillaGorilla · · Last activity · 6 posts · 428 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
25 November 2004
Last activity
27 November 2004
Original author
MagillaGorilla
Posts
6
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
428
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–6 of 6
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Dear My Disciples,

    I have been watching the Danny Callen v. JT title fight with great
    interest. It was a beautiful to see a thread with the subject "you
    people are gay" metamorphose into threats, personal attacks, and hatred.

    I have analyzed the thread thoroughly and will now share my opinion with
    all you dumbasses.

    I have concluded that JT won on all rounds except the Second Amendment
    issue, which he side-stepped.

    And I conclude that Danny Callen is stupid because he thinks that
    someone's beliefs should not be used to characterize their intelligence.

    That's the stupidest [censored] thing I've ever heard in my life, Danny
    Callen. It's completely fair game to do that. Obviously JT knows this
    is fair game, and did it.

    Danny Callen, on the other hand, says that for some reason you CANNOT
    use somebody's political opinions to define their intelligence, but
    doesn't state why (oh, actually he does, but calls it respect).

    So, tell me Danny Callen, if someone believes Osama bin Laden is a great
    man and they respect his political ideals, are they stupid? If someone
    believes [censored] was on the right track and wishes he were still ruling
    Germany, is it fair to call them stupid? Is someone who hates
    homosexuals but masks their hatred in politically correct jargon like
    "family values" a good person or a lying, bigot?

    According to JT, you are allowed to judge somebody by their political
    affiliations and beliefs. But according to Danny Callen, they cannot be
    judged, or called stupid, because you have to respect their opinions?

    Guess what Danny Callen, I don't have to respect any political opinion
    that espouses crimes against humanity, murder, corruption, lies, and
    results in the death and suffering of millions of people.

    I have no [censored] idea what rule book you are reading from Danny, but my
    guess is you are also a Bible thumper.

    You are stupid, Danny.

    Do yourself a favor Danny Callen - go look up the first Amendment. It
    says you can say or think whatever the [censored] you want. And that includes
    a right to NOT respect someone.

    God Bless America,

    Magilla
    Patriot

  2. "MagillaGorilla" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Dear My Disciples,

    Guess what Danny Callen, I don't have to respect any political opinion

    Quoted message said:

    that espouses crimes against humanity, murder, corruption, lies, and
    results in the death and suffering of millions of people.

    Well stated MG, while I'll leave the next undercard for you and Danny, you
    got some substance here. However we are up around 100,000 to 300,000 people
    slaughtered, we haven't reached the million mark yet. God help us if we kill
    that many without putting a stop to the madness. Where are the numbers for
    the Taliban we slaughtered in Afghanistan?

  3. MagillaGorilla <[email hidden]> wrote in
    news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    Is someone who hates
    homosexuals but masks their hatred in politically correct jargon like
    "family values" a good person or a lying, bigot?

    Grape ape,

    First off, I just want to say that I agree with you on the content this
    post.

    Secondly, you should know that calling people [censored] and then denouncing
    gay-bashers is hypocritical.

    - Boyd S.

  4. Boyd Speerschneider said:

    MagillaGorilla <[email hidden]> wrote in
    news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    Is someone who hates
    homosexuals but masks their hatred in politically correct jargon like
    "family values" a good person or a lying, bigot?

    Grape ape,

    First off, I just want to say that I agree with you on the content this
    post.

    Secondly, you should know that calling people [censored] and then denouncing
    gay-bashers is hypocritical.

    - Boyd S.

    Yeah, you're right, I should probably clean up my filthy mouth a bit.
    BTW, I'm using the second definition of '[censored],' which isn't an
    anti-homosexual connotation. It means you are queer.

    I don't have a problem with what Elton John does in his satin-sheet bedroom.

    Magilla

  5. MagillaGorilla said:

    I don't have a problem with what Elton John does in his satin-sheet
    bedroom.

    That's more about Elton John's bedroom than I care to know. I don't
    know how you came by this information, but keep the rest to yourself,
    please.

    --

    --------------------

    Remove CLOTHES to reply

  6. MagillaGorilla <[email hidden]> wrote in
    news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    I don't have a problem with what Elton John does in his satin-sheet
    bedroom.

    I do. Satin is so gaudy. With all that money he can't be tasteful?

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.