P
Pikachu
Guest
In article <[email protected]>,
jim beam <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ron Ruff wrote:
> > On Aug 12, 8:26 am, jim beam <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> ugh, enduro suck. and their seals are "low friction", i.e. poor contact
> >> so they don't in fact "seal" very well. basically, they're just cheapo
> >> garbage sold as "bike specific" with excessive mark-up.
> >
> > It was my understanding at least, that they have double lips on each
> > seal (LL designation). They certainly cost more than others! Do you
> > know of a better option?
>
>
> http://www.skf.com/portal/skf/home/products?newlink=1_1_6a&lang=en&maincatalog
> ue=1
>
> will cost you nearly 4 times as much.
Given that the failure mode for bicycle sealed bearings is contaminant
intrusion, how will the indicated improvements of "Improved bearing
steel", "Unique SKF heat treatment procedures", and "Improved surface
finish" of these 4-times-as-expensive SKF "Explorer" bearings help?
Pikachu
jim beam <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ron Ruff wrote:
> > On Aug 12, 8:26 am, jim beam <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> ugh, enduro suck. and their seals are "low friction", i.e. poor contact
> >> so they don't in fact "seal" very well. basically, they're just cheapo
> >> garbage sold as "bike specific" with excessive mark-up.
> >
> > It was my understanding at least, that they have double lips on each
> > seal (LL designation). They certainly cost more than others! Do you
> > know of a better option?
>
>
> http://www.skf.com/portal/skf/home/products?newlink=1_1_6a&lang=en&maincatalog
> ue=1
>
> will cost you nearly 4 times as much.
Given that the failure mode for bicycle sealed bearings is contaminant
intrusion, how will the indicated improvements of "Improved bearing
steel", "Unique SKF heat treatment procedures", and "Improved surface
finish" of these 4-times-as-expensive SKF "Explorer" bearings help?
Pikachu