UK and Europe · Public discussion

Jeremy Clarkson- rat killer???

Started by Howard · · Last activity · 16 posts · 1,709 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
17 May 2003
Last activity
20 May 2003
Original author
Howard
Posts
16
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,709
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–16 of 16
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I am sure that I heard on the news a couple of days ago that Jeremy 'get out of my way' Clarkson has
    been accused of taking part in the 'sport' of 'rat killing'. This involves a load of halfwits with
    clubs going into a locked barn or similar and bashing the brains out of large numbers of rats
    especially collected for the purpose. The story also mentioned that Clarkson has boasted of
    deliberately running down foxes and cats as he regards them as 'vermin'.

    Thing is this story does not seem to have circulated very much. Has anyone seen the story in print
    anywhere? I am beginning to think that I was hallucinating...

    If it is true does the story allow us to understand better the murky depths of his 'thought'
    processes, so enlightening us as to why he spouts so much selfish, irresponsible [censored]?

  2. "Howard" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I am sure that I heard on the news a couple of days ago that Jeremy 'get out of my way' Clarkson
    has been accused of taking part in the 'sport' of 'rat killing'. This involves a load of halfwits
    with clubs going into a locked barn or similar and bashing the brains out of large numbers of rats
    especially collected for the purpose.

    specially collected ? I wouldn't have thought that was needed or possible

    put a barn in a country location, wait a few days and it will be chock full of rats and other highly
    destructive vermin with all sorts of diseases which threaten livestock and people alike. and before
    you think 'threaten people'? think about rat wee and weils disease, which killed a friend of mine.

    Quoted message said:

    The story also mentioned that Clarkson has boasted of deliberately running down foxes and cats as
    he regards them as 'vermin'.

    this is chinese whispers par excellence. He claimed to have run a a fox over rather than swerve into
    the oncoming traffic. a sensible action under any circumstances. people 1 fox 0 and rightly so.

    the animal rights lot, divested of humour anyway, went and took the 'deliberately' bit seriously and
    reported him to plod. an act of self centered timewasting, imo.

    your mention of cats is the first mention I've heard and I've been following the story quite
    closely. next he will be biting the heads off kittens and puppies whilst mowing down old ladies and
    children in his range rover !

    Quoted message said:

    Thing is this story does not seem to have circulated very much. Has anyone seen the story in print
    anywhere? I am beginning to think that I was hallucinating...

    possibly, partially. it was in the times last week, or was it the sun last Sat ? I read all the
    majors on a weekend, online, and I was amused by the story and how it threatened to spiral out of
    hand. everyones, apparently.

    Quoted message said:

    If it is true does the story allow us to understand better the murky depths of his 'thought'
    processes, so enlightening us as to why he spouts so much selfish, irresponsible [censored]?

    he does it:

    because it's funny

    because he gets paid a very large wad to do so.

    because he knows that humourless, gullible people all over the country will take him seriously and
    expose themselves as humourless and gullible. then they'll get themselves into a right old lather
    about off the cuff, flippant, anti PC (but largely harmless) comments meant to be read with a light
    heart and a tounge firmly in cheek.

    think pinch of salt, freedom of expression and good old english eccentricity.

    that's my take on it, anyway.

    Albert

  3. To Albert.

    I thought I wasn't hallucinating, I would still like to see an 'in print' version of the story
    though. I heard about it whilst listening to the radio over in N.Wales.

    Yes, rats are vermin but there does seem to be something rather suspect about people gathering
    together to batter wild animals to death for fun, even rats.

    I have heard this 'freedom of expresssion [censored]' before. How about the freedom to use the public
    highway free of the fear of being mown down by some boy racer whose limited mental powers have been
    overly influenced by watching the antics of wan*kers like Clarkeson on TV?

    How about the freedom to be allowed to continue to live rather then being killed or maimed by some
    guillable halfwit who has been conned into spending every spare penny they earn on some overweight,
    overpowered car because they don't have the intelligence and independence of thought to construct a
    truly meaningful life?

    'Mostly harmless'? OK, so 'Top Gear' now seems to use a race track for its demonstrations of
    handbrake turns and so on, but it still encourages an irresponsible attitude to car use, if only
    because it suggest that cars are primarily a way of 'having fun' and 'excitement, rather then being
    tin boxes to get one from A to B. Certainly the local petrol heads, not having access to a private
    race track, seem to think that the street outside my house is a suitable place to replicate the sort
    of behaviour seen on programs like 'Top Gear'.

    Yes, I am fully aware that Clarkson is a [censored] taker, and of the view that his opinions should be
    seen a a bit of a joke. However, I don't think that the 3500 a year killed by speeding and
    irresponsibly/incompetently driven cars, or rather their grieving relatives, see the joke much, nor
    are they likely to regard Clarksons selfish and dismissive arrogance with a 'light heart' ...

    Of course, if any of the above leaves you feeling a little 'humourless' just remember that it is not
    only Clarkson who enjoys winding people up...

  4. "Howard" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    To Albert.

    I thought I wasn't hallucinating, I would still like to see an 'in print' version of the story
    though. I heard about it whilst listening to the radio over in N.Wales.

    it was in last saturdays edition of clarkson on saturday in the currant bun it's not in the archive
    (I tried to find a link for you) perhaps Mr Clarkson would email the article to you.. but with legal
    action pending, he may not.

    Quoted message said:

    Yes, rats are vermin but there does seem to be something rather suspect about people gathering
    together to batter wild animals to death for fun, even rats.

    indeed there does. I don't know if it was for fun, I wasn't there.

    if it happened at all I bet it was crazy. the thought of a load of grown men with sticks
    walloping rats in a barn for whatever reason is, rats rights aside, a stange image with loads of
    mileage for humour...

    Quoted message said:

    I have heard this 'freedom of expresssion [censored]' before.

    it's hardly [censored], you're doing it now. if that's [censored] so's what you are saying.

    Quoted message said:

    How about the freedom to use the public highway free of the fear of being mown down by some boy
    racer whose limited mental powers have been overly influenced by watching the antics of wan*kers
    like Clarkeson on TV?

    sadly, it doesn't exist, and without the boy racers being made as aware of their responsibilities as
    they are about thier rights it's going to remain a dog eat dog caper each time we venture out on the
    roads with car or bike.

    Quoted message said:

    How about the freedom to be allowed to continue to live rather then being killed or maimed by some
    guillable halfwit who has been conned into spending every spare penny they earn on some
    overweight, overpowered car because they don't have the intelligence and independence of thought
    to construct a truly meaningful life?

    I couldn't agree more old bean. though it is possible to buy and run a car without being conned or
    mowing down assorted peds, bikers and cyclists. best not lump everyone in the same highly
    generalised category

    Quoted message said:

    'Mostly harmless'? OK, so 'Top Gear' now seems to use a race track for its demonstrations of
    handbrake turns and so on, but it still encourages an irresponsible attitude to car use, if only
    because it suggest that cars are primarily a way of 'having fun' and 'excitement, rather then
    being tin boxes to get one from A to B. Certainly the local petrol heads, not having access to a
    private race track, seem to think that the street outside my house is a suitable place to
    replicate the sort of behaviour seen on programs like 'Top Gear'.

    no, his outlandish comments about our neighbours and his irreverence about the hand that feeds him
    is what I was on about. the recent move to micopenis v micropenis on a 'racetrack' is, I think both
    wrong and a pendulum like reaction to the saftey nazis and lifestyle police that forced top gear to
    concentrate on mpg, features and the urban cycle for so long.

    Quoted message said:

    Yes, I am fully aware that Clarkson is a [censored] taker, and of the view that his opinions should be
    seen a a bit of a joke. However, I don't think that the 3500 a year killed by speeding and
    irresponsibly/incompetently driven cars, or rather their grieving relatives, see the joke much,
    nor are they likely to regard Clarksons selfish and dismissive arrogance with a 'light heart' ...

    1500 people die falling down stairs. hundreds of people present to A & E with incedents involving
    cotton wool. you can't legislate stupidity out of the gene pool, sadly. I think the confluence of
    increased awareness and improved vehicles will lower the figures somewhat, but there will always be
    casualties and it has to be said that it's quite remarkable that, given the speeds involved and the
    miles travelled, there are so few deaths.

    every death is an upset for the relatives but some may be doing the gene pool a favour by taking
    themselves out.

    Quoted message said:

    Of course, if any of the above leaves you feeling a little 'humourless' just remember that it is
    not only Clarkson who enjoys winding people up...

    oh, it takes more that a few harmless, freedom of expression type questions for me to lose my sense
    of humour. after all, it's just a frank exchange of views.

    be careful out there, people, it's not safe.

    Albert

  5. Howard said:

    also mentioned that Clarkson has boasted of deliberately running down foxes and cats as he regards
    them as 'vermin'.

    It was on 'Have I got News for You'. It is a satirical show fer goodness sake. If every remark on
    that show was treated with seriousness and repeated on video playback all the participants would be
    in jail, or on the wrong end of libel suits. Live a little, eh? I saw the show - Jeremy was just
    playing up to his public persona of the cheeky chappie. IIRC, the subject of fox hunting came up and
    he joked that he ran down a fox whilst driving, but made the error of using the word 'deliberate'.

  6. Couldn't have said it better myself! "albert fish" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "Howard" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I am sure that I heard on the news a couple of days ago that Jeremy 'get out of my way' Clarkson
    has been accused of taking part in the 'sport' of 'rat killing'. This involves a load of
    halfwits with clubs going into a locked barn or similar and bashing the brains out of large
    numbers of rats especially collected for the purpose.

    specially collected ? I wouldn't have thought that was needed or possible

    put a barn in a country location, wait a few days and it will be chock


    full

    Quoted message said:

    of rats and other highly destructive vermin with all sorts of diseases


    which

    Quoted message said:

    threaten livestock and people alike. and before you think 'threaten


    people'?

    Quoted message said:

    think about rat wee and weils disease, which killed a friend of mine.

    Quoted message said:

    The story also mentioned that Clarkson has boasted of deliberately running down foxes and cats
    as he regards them as 'vermin'.

    this is chinese whispers par excellence. He claimed to have run a a fox over rather than swerve
    into the oncoming traffic. a sensible action under any circumstances. people 1 fox 0 and
    rightly so.

    the animal rights lot, divested of humour anyway, went and took the


    'deliberately'

    Quoted message said:

    bit seriously and reported him to plod. an act of self centered


    timewasting, imo.

    Quoted message said:


    your mention of cats is the first mention I've heard and I've been


    following

    Quoted message said:

    the story quite closely. next he will be biting the heads off kittens and


    puppies

    Quoted message said:

    whilst mowing down old ladies and children in his range rover !

    Quoted message said:

    Thing is this story does not seem to have circulated very much. Has anyone seen the story in
    print anywhere? I am beginning to think that I was hallucinating...

    possibly, partially. it was in the times last week, or was it the sun last


    Sat ?

    Quoted message said:

    I read all the majors on a weekend, online, and I was amused by the story and how it threatened to
    spiral out of hand. everyones, apparently.

    Quoted message said:

    If it is true does the story allow us to understand better the murky depths of his 'thought'
    processes, so enlightening us as to why he spouts so much selfish, irresponsible [censored]?

    he does it:

    because it's funny

    because he gets paid a very large wad to do so.

    because he knows that humourless, gullible people all over the country will take him seriously and
    expose themselves as humourless and gullible. then they'll get themselves into a right old lather
    about off the cuff,


    flippant,

    Quoted message said:

    anti PC (but largely harmless) comments meant to be read with a light


    heart

    Quoted message said:

    and a tounge firmly in cheek.

    think pinch of salt, freedom of expression and good old english


    eccentricity.

    Quoted message said:


    that's my take on it, anyway.

    Albert

  7. A spirited defence of the 'right' to treat the public road as a race track but most of what you say
    is largely irrelevant.

    Of course people find all sorts of ways to hurt themselves, and long may they be allowed to do so.
    The BIG difference with car use is that INNOCENT THIRD PARTIES ARE VERY OFTEN THE ONES THAT GET
    HURT. If someone wants to drive at 150MPH on a race track, great. Indeed I have raced motorcycles
    myself. If someone wants to rock climb or go off piste skiing, or do DIY without wearing ahard hat
    and dust mask, great. However, people have NO RIGHT WHATSOEVER to put other peoples lives at risk.
    Big difference...

    Consider the difference between the way health and safety legislation is (quite rightly) applied and
    our attitudes to car use. People might whinge about the 'nanny state' making ineffectual, token
    gestures to try to control the way cars are used. However, if the same 'minimal risk' standards of
    safety were expected when driving as in areas covered by health and safety legislation the maximum
    speed in town would be resticted to 10 MPH. Whats more, not only would the driver but his boss and
    the company executive might well end up facing manslaughter charges if anyone were killed.

    It is also fatuous to claim that depictions of speed and power have no influence on the attitudes of
    car uses. Most of the advertsing of cars exploits the vulnerability of the public to such messages.
    The primary selling points of cars are speed and power with perceptions of status following on some
    way behind (Even further behind come perception of personal safety. The notion of 3rd party safey
    are conspicuous by their absence). Without this focus on performance we would by now be able to buy
    lightweight, pedestrian friendly vehicles that could cruise at 70 MPh and do 300 MPG...

    Quoted message said:


    be careful out there, people, it's not safe.

    I am very well aware of that. The real question is how do we make thinks safer. Even minimal
    restrictions on the way cars are driven would save huge numbers of lives and serious injuries.
    As the recent PACTS report on speed pointed out, some very reasonable measures such as reducing
    the average speed of all vehicles by 10 MPH would see the annual fatality rate drop to below
    1000 per year.

    In any case, the ways cars are used have an even wider impact then the number of casualties
    themselves. For example, because they fear traffic, people feel compelled to drive, even when they
    would prefer to walk or cycle. So much for freedom of choice...

  8. Quoted message said:

    A spirited defence of the 'right' to treat the public road as a race track but most of what you
    say is largely irrelevant.

    eh ? I was not defending anyone. I was expressing an opinon. and as I am of the opinon that public
    roads should never be used as a racetrack your whole opening sentence is irrelevant to what I said.

    ergo, I cannot go any further with this thread, it's a bit too contrived.

    Albert

  9. Paul Saunders said:

    Couldn't have said it better myself!

    Is that why you needlesly repeated it all?

  10. I didn;t repeat it. It was an attachment. [censored]! "Marc" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Paul Saunders said:

    Couldn't have said it better myself!

    Is that why you needlesly repeated it all?

  11. Paul Saunders said:

    I didn;t repeat it. It was an attachment. [censored]!

    Actually you did repeat it, due to the evils of untrimmed top-posting. ASCII doesn't "do"
    attachments.

    Guy
    ===
    ** WARNING ** This posting may contain traces of irony. chapmancentral.comchapmancentral.com (BT ADSL and
    dynamic DNS permitting)
    NOTE: BT Openworld have now blocked port 25 (without notice), so old mail addresses may no longer
    work. Apologies.

  12. Paul Saunders said:

    I didn;t repeat it. It was an attachment. [censored]! "Marc" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Paul Saunders said:

    Couldn't have said it better myself!

    Is that why you needlesly repeated it all?

    You did, it wasn't and possibly ( especially to those embarrased that they cocked up).

  13. On Mon, 19 May 2003 19:15:53 +0100, Just zis Guy, you know? scrawled: ) Actually you did repeat it,
    due to the evils of untrimmed top-posting.

    Everyone top-posts at work, generally in RTF or, if I'm lucky, HTML. Can I work in a dot-com
    again, please?

    J-P
    --
    Controversial swearing rock millionaire PETER BUCK of REM was bailed on air rage charges. The
    captain mistook him for John Prescott, nobody wanted to hear his demos and his bilberry yoghourt
    turned out to be

  14. j-p.s said:

    Everyone top-posts at work, generally in RTF or, if I'm lucky, HTML. Can I work in a dot-com
    again, please?

    Same here, actually, but I try to remember not to in civilised company
    :-)

    Guy
    ===
    ** WARNING ** This posting may contain traces of irony. chapmancentral.comchapmancentral.com (BT ADSL and
    dynamic DNS permitting)
    NOTE: BT Openworld have now blocked port 25 (without notice), so old mail addresses may no longer
    work. Apologies.

  15. On Mon, 19 May 2003 22:30:39 +0100, Just zis Guy, you know? scrawled: )>Everyone top-posts at work,
    generally in RTF or, if I'm lucky, HTML. Can I )>work in a dot-com again, please? ) ) Same here,
    actually, but I try to remember not to in civilised company

    I am trying to do so at work too. Almost every e-mail that comes through me gets converted into
    plain text, trimmed and replied to in a logical order i.e. sequentially through the e-mail and not
    all at the top. I intend to quietly shift the focus of the people I work with from design, colour
    and unpredictable indentation to readability.

    (I don't mean they come through me in any dirty sense, in case anyone was wondering.)

    J-P
    --
    May all your days be gold my child

  16. "Paul Saunders" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    "Marc" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Paul Saunders said:

    Couldn't have said it better myself!


    Is that why you needlesly repeated it all?


    I didn;t repeat it. It was an attachment. [censored]!

    This link into Google will show you how your message appeared to the world.
    makeashorterlink.commakeashorterlink.com . Your "me too" was posted above the original message
    (top-posted) which was quoted in full. The piece of junk you use as a news reader is at least
    partly to blame.

    --
    Dave...

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.