General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Jan: A retraction is appropriate

Mark Probertjan · 2004-01-22T06:28:14+00:00

"Jan" wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]... Mark Probert. Who spends his times on the net releasing his many frustrations, while his wife *works* to support the family. As I said in an email, I have never brought your husband into a discussion in any negative manner. You may retract what you just said. As for your posting of the URL, you take advantage of my stated Resolution wherein I refuse to deal with that person in any manner.

Started by Mark Probertjan · 22 January 2004 · Last activity 5 March 2004 · 10 posts · 358 views

← Back to General fitness, health and nutrition

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

01 / Original postJan: A retraction is appropriateMark Probertjan · 22 Jan 2004 02 / This pagePosts 1–10Page 1 of 1 · chronological order 03 / Latest replyPost #10Mark Probert-Ma · 5 Mar 2004

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section: General fitness, health and nutrition
Published: 22 January 2004
Last activity: 5 March 2004
Original author: Mark Probertjan
Posts: 10
Discussion status: Public discussion
Total views: 358
Views / 30 days: 0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Original post
Mark Probertjan
Archived post

22 January 2004, 06:28 UTC #1

"Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...
Mark Probert. Who spends his
Quoted message said:
times on the net releasing his many frustrations, while his wife *works*

to
Quoted message said:
support the family.
As I said in an email, I have never brought your husband into a discussion in any negative manner.
You may retract what you just said.
As for your posting of the URL, you take advantage of my stated Resolution wherein I refuse to deal
with that person in any manner.

Report
Jan
Archived post

22 January 2004, 06:28 UTC #2

Quoted message said:
Subject: Jan: A retraction is appropriate
From: "Mark ProbertJanuary 21, 2004" [email hidden]
Date: 1/21/2004 3:45 PM Pacific Standard Time
Take a spoonful of sugar to wash the medicine down Mark.
Jan

Report
Mark Probertjan
Archived post

22 January 2004, 12:19 UTC #3

"Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Subject: Jan: A retraction is appropriate From: "Mark ProbertJanuary 21, 2004" MarkProbert1-21-
[email hidden] Date: 1/21/2004 3:45 PM Pacific Standard Time
Take a spoonful of sugar to wash the medicine down Mark.
Jan, I have never mentioned your family in a negative manner. You have repeatedly done so
regarding mine.
A retraction is in order.

Report
Michele
Archived post

22 January 2004, 20:06 UTC #4

"Mark ProbertJanuary 22, 2004" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...
Quoted message said:
"Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Subject: Jan: A retraction is appropriate From: "Mark ProbertJanuary 21, 2004" MarkProbert1-21-
[email hidden] Date: 1/21/2004 3:45 PM Pacific Standard Time
Take a spoonful of sugar to wash the medicine down Mark.
Jan, I have never mentioned your family in a negative manner. You have repeatedly done so
regarding mine.
A retraction is in order.
Jan feels that mentioning the family members of posters she disagrees with is perfectly appropriate
-- all the while [censored] & whining when the tables are turned on her. It's part of her
hypocritical, nauseating, pseudo-religious "charm"........
Michele I ENJOY being a cranky [censored].

Report
Mark Probertjan
Archived post

23 January 2004, 12:01 UTC #5

"Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Subject: Re: Jan: A retraction is appropriate From: "Mark ProbertJanuary 22, 2004" MarkProbert1-22-
[email hidden] Date: 1/22/2004 3:00 AM Pacific Standard Time Message-id:
<[email hidden]>
"Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
>Subject: Jan: A retraction is appropriate From: "Mark ProbertJanuary 21, 2004"

[email hidden]
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
>Date: 1/21/2004 3:45 PM Pacific Standard Time
Take a spoonful of sugar to wash the medicine down Mark.
Jan, I have never mentioned your family in a negative manner. You have repeatedly done so
regarding mine.
A retraction is in order.
Take a spoonful of sugar to wash the medicine down Mark.
Jan, I have never mentioned your family in a negative manner. You have repeatedly done so
regarding mine.
A retraction is in order.

Report
Rb
Archived post

16 February 2004, 15:48 UTC #6

So where's Fred?
"Michele" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
"Mark ProbertJanuary 22, 2004" <[email hidden]> wrote

in message news:<[email hidden]>...
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
"Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
>Subject: Jan: A retraction is appropriate From: "Mark ProbertJanuary 21, 2004"

[email hidden]
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
>Date: 1/21/2004 3:45 PM Pacific Standard Time
Take a spoonful of sugar to wash the medicine down Mark.
Jan, I have never mentioned your family in a negative manner. You have repeatedly done so
regarding mine.
A retraction is in order.
Jan feels that mentioning the family members of posters she disagrees with is perfectly
appropriate -- all the while [censored] & whining when the tables are turned on her. It's part of
her hypocritical, nauseating, pseudo-religious "charm"........
Michele I ENJOY being a cranky [censored].

Report
Michele
Archived post

17 February 2004, 01:25 UTC #7

"rb" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...
Quoted message said:
So where's Fred?
Too much "traffic" posting directly to Usenet -- easier to do it this way.
Another person interested in my man? Odd......
Michele I ENJOY being a cranky [censored].

Report
Mark Probert-Fe
Archived post

17 February 2004, 01:25 UTC #8

"Michele" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
"rb" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

news:<[email hidden]>...
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
So where's Fred?
Too much "traffic" posting directly to Usenet -- easier to do it this way.
Another person interested in my man? Odd......
You are responding to our old friend, rubber brain.

Report
Rb
Archived post

5 March 2004, 07:03 UTC #9

<snippage of person whining and snivelling>
Does your measly little god still permit you to lie or can he do nothing
about it? I'd like to chew him up and spit him out. He's not worth having.

Report
Mark Probert-Ma
Archived post

5 March 2004, 14:59 UTC #10

"rb" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
<snippage of person whining and snivelling>
Does your measly little god still permit you to lie or can he do nothing
about it? I'd like to chew him up and spit him out. He's not worth having.
Who are you talking to, some imaginary poster?

Report

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.

Jump through the discussion

What we know about this thread

Continue through CyclingForums

Active in this thread