Jan: A retraction is appropriate

Quoted message said:

Subject: Jan: A retraction is appropriate
From: "Mark ProbertJanuary 21, 2004" [email hidden]
Date: 1/21/2004 3:45 PM Pacific Standard Time

Take a spoonful of sugar to wash the medicine down Mark.

Jan

"Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Subject: Jan: A retraction is appropriate
From: "Mark ProbertJanuary 21, 2004" [email hidden]
Date: 1/21/2004 3:45 PM Pacific Standard Time

Take a spoonful of sugar to wash the medicine down Mark.

Jan, I have never mentioned your family in a negative manner. You have
repeatedly done so regarding mine.

A retraction is in order.

<< A retraction is in order. >>

I should think NOT, Probert.

Perhaps you should seek assistance for your abuse problems, Probert......after
all the *cow* died, and your *bull* around here has never been retracted.....

Why are you demanding from Jan, something you would never take part in
yourself?

"If you're gonna walk on thin ice, you may as well dance." (Jessie Winchester).

"Mark ProbertJanuary 22, 2004" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

"Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Subject: Jan: A retraction is appropriate
From: "Mark ProbertJanuary 21, 2004" [email hidden]
Date: 1/21/2004 3:45 PM Pacific Standard Time

Take a spoonful of sugar to wash the medicine down Mark.

Jan, I have never mentioned your family in a negative manner. You have
repeatedly done so regarding mine.

A retraction is in order.

Jan feels that mentioning the family members of posters she disagrees
with is perfectly appropriate -- all the while [censored] & whining when
the tables are turned on her. It's part of her hypocritical,
nauseating, pseudo-religious "charm"........

Michele
I ENJOY being a cranky [censored].

<< Jan feels that mentioning the family members of posters she disagrees
with is perfectly appropriate -- all the while [censored] & whining when
the tables are turned on her. It's part of her hypocritical,
nauseating, pseudo-religious "charm"........ >>

Hey, Michele....what exactly is *your charm*?
Other than being the self proclaimed " cranky [censored]"?

"If you're gonna walk on thin ice, you may as well dance." (Jessie Winchester).

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Jan: A retraction is appropriate
From: "Mark ProbertJanuary 22, 2004" [email hidden]
Date: 1/22/2004 3:00 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

"Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Subject: Jan: A retraction is appropriate
From: "Mark ProbertJanuary 21, 2004" [email hidden]
Date: 1/21/2004 3:45 PM Pacific Standard Time

Take a spoonful of sugar to wash the medicine down Mark.

Jan, I have never mentioned your family in a negative manner. You have
repeatedly done so regarding mine.

A retraction is in order.

Take a spoonful of sugar to wash the medicine down Mark.

Jan

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Jan: A retraction is appropriate
From: [email hidden] (Michele)
Date: 1/22/2004 11:35 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

"Mark ProbertJanuary 22, 2004" <[email hidden]> wrote in
message news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

"Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

>Subject: Jan: A retraction is appropriate
>From: "Mark ProbertJanuary 21, 2004" [email hidden]
>Date: 1/21/2004 3:45 PM Pacific Standard Time

Take a spoonful of sugar to wash the medicine down Mark.

Jan, I have never mentioned your family in a negative manner. You have
repeatedly done so regarding mine.

A retraction is in order.

Jan feels

There's another reason for the purpose of this ng.

For [censored] to tell how others feel, while being a part of the *gang* who
transfer their EXACT behavior to others.

Michele, the cranky [censored], can prepare the spoon of sugar to wash Mark's
medicine down.

What a group.

Jan

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Jan: A retraction is appropriate
From: "Mark ProbertJanuary 22, 2004" [email hidden]
Date: 1/22/2004 3:00 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

"Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

>Subject: Jan: A retraction is appropriate
>From: "Mark ProbertJanuary 21, 2004" [email hidden]
>Date: 1/21/2004 3:45 PM Pacific Standard Time

Take a spoonful of sugar to wash the medicine down Mark.

Jan, I have never mentioned your family in a negative manner. You have
repeatedly done so regarding mine.

A retraction is in order.

Take a spoonful of sugar to wash the medicine down Mark.

Jan, here's a spoonful of Aspartame to wash down your amalgams.

[email hidden] (DEBBEE1023) wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

<< Jan feels that mentioning the family members of posters she disagrees
with is perfectly appropriate -- all the while [censored] & whining when
the tables are turned on her. It's part of her hypocritical,
nauseating, pseudo-religious "charm"........ >>

Hey, Michele....what exactly is *your charm*?
Other than being the self proclaimed " cranky [censored]"?

Gee DEBBEE -- in contrast to yourself & Jan -- I don't expect special
treatment from others & I don't make up one set of standards for
myself & another for other people. And unlike you I certainly don't
live in a world of "let's pretend" -- where you get sued for making up
stories about a celebrity, claim to be interesting enough to be the
target of computer "spying", & insist you are a "journalist" about to
break some "big story" which never happens (no surprise there).

BTW -- no need to put my words *cranky [censored]* in quotations marks,
which might mislead folks to think I don't mean it. I have NO problem
being a cranky [censored]. It's not as if I'm a deluded incompetent
anti-Semite like yourself. Now THAT would be something else.......

Michele
I ENJOY being a cranky [censored].

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Jan: A retraction is appropriate
From: [email hidden] (Michele)
Date: 1/22/2004 4:45 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

[email hidden] (DEBBEE1023) wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

<< Jan feels that mentioning the family members of posters she disagrees
with is perfectly appropriate -- all the while [censored] & whining when
the tables are turned on her. It's part of her hypocritical,
nauseating, pseudo-religious "charm"........ >>

Hey, Michele....what exactly is *your charm*?
Other than being the self proclaimed " cranky [censored]"?

Gee DEBBEE -- in contrast to yourself & Jan

Here we go, [censored], [censored], [censored].

Quoted message said:

I don't expect special
treatment from others

Neither do I.

Quoted message said:

I don't make up one set of standards for myself & another for other people.

Indeed, you are a perfect [censored].

Jan

PS. People don't really like [censored].

"Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Jan: A retraction is appropriate
From: "Mark ProbertJanuary 22, 2004" [email hidden]
Date: 1/22/2004 3:00 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

"Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

>Subject: Jan: A retraction is appropriate
>From: "Mark ProbertJanuary 21, 2004"

[email hidden]

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

>Date: 1/21/2004 3:45 PM Pacific Standard Time

Take a spoonful of sugar to wash the medicine down Mark.

Jan, I have never mentioned your family in a negative manner. You have
repeatedly done so regarding mine.

A retraction is in order.

Take a spoonful of sugar to wash the medicine down Mark.

Jan, I have never mentioned your family in a negative manner. You have
repeatedly done so regarding mine.

A retraction is in order.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Jan: A retraction is appropriate
From: [email hidden] (Michele)
Date: 1/22/2004 4:45 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

[email hidden] (DEBBEE1023) wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

<< Jan feels that mentioning the family members of posters she disagrees
with is perfectly appropriate -- all the while [censored] & whining when
the tables are turned on her. It's part of her hypocritical,
nauseating, pseudo-religious "charm"........ >>

Hey, Michele....what exactly is *your charm*?
Other than being the self proclaimed " cranky [censored]"?

Gee DEBBEE -- in contrast to yourself & Jan

Here we go, [censored], [censored], [censored].

Quoted message said:

I don't expect special
treatment from others

Neither do I.

Quoted message said:

I don't make up one set of standards for myself & another for other people.

Indeed, you are a perfect [censored].

Jan

PS. People don't really like [censored].

But Jan, YOU seem to like JBain, Gymmie Bob, Atlas, and Tim Bolen.
Are you suggesting that YOU aren't a person or that some people do like
[censored]?

[email hidden] (Jan) wrote
<snip>

Quoted message said:

Here we go, [censored], [censored], [censored].

Quoted message said:

I don't expect special
treatment from others

Neither do I.

Quoted message said:

I don't make up one set of standards for myself & another for other people.

Indeed, you are a perfect [censored].

Jan

PS. People don't really like [censored].

Goodness...I wonder what Jan's pastor would think if he knew she spoke
this way? Being all Christian-y and holy, this is certainly not an
acceptable way to talk to others, is it?

Mark

[email hidden] (Jan) wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Jan: A retraction is appropriate
From: [email hidden] (Michele)
Date: 1/22/2004 11:35 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

"Mark ProbertJanuary 22, 2004" <[email hidden]> wrote in
message news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

"Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
> >Subject: Jan: A retraction is appropriate
> >From: "Mark ProbertJanuary 21, 2004" [email hidden]
> >Date: 1/21/2004 3:45 PM Pacific Standard Time
>
> Take a spoonful of sugar to wash the medicine down Mark.

Jan, I have never mentioned your family in a negative manner. You have
repeatedly done so regarding mine.

A retraction is in order.

Jan feels

There's another reason for the purpose of this ng.

For [censored] to tell how others feel, while being a part of the *gang* who
transfer their EXACT behavior to others.

Michele, the cranky [censored], can prepare the spoon of sugar to wash Mark's
medicine down.

What a group.

Jan

Gee Jan, 2 posts that repeat the same old paranoic nonsense you always
spew here. "Us against Them", conspiracies abounding, blah, blah,
blah.

You've whined & acted outraged that some posters mentioned things
about your neglect of your parents, yet you feel perfectly comfortable
using other people's family members in your attempts to belittle them.
You've demonstrated the very essence of the word "hypocritical" by
doing so. *You've* proven that you feel justified in doing so.
Nobody has to guess or wonder or figure out that you feel what you do
is okay, but that others doing the same thing are some sort of evil
"gang". For the love of the faith you falsely claim to follow -- YOU
have told us this! Are you that much of a simpleton that you think
your own words don't spell it out???

Sometimes I actually almost feel pity for you -- your stupidity &
denial of reality must be a tremendous burden for you & your family to
deal with. But then I remember your disgusting religious intolerance,
your clear-to-the-bone hypocrisy, & your inability to do much but
complain without doing a damn thing to change what you complain about
-- & I'm grateful that you are as dumb as a stump. At least it limits
the damage your nastiness can inflict on others.

Continue to post articles you don't understand, Jan. Mis-use &
butcher words like "ego" & "voila". Pretend to be a pious person of
good character while most of your posts prove otherwise. Such habits
make it easy to spot you for the ineffective loon you are.

Michele
I ENJOY being a cranky [censored].

Quoted message said:

[email hidden] (Jan) wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Jan: A retraction is appropriate
From: [email hidden] (Michele)
Date: 1/22/2004 11:35 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

"Mark ProbertJanuary 22, 2004" <[email hidden]> wrote

in

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

message news:<[email hidden]>...
> "Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
> news:[email hidden]...
> > >Subject: Jan: A retraction is appropriate
> > >From: "Mark ProbertJanuary 21, 2004"

[email hidden]

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> > >Date: 1/21/2004 3:45 PM Pacific Standard Time
> >
> > Take a spoonful of sugar to wash the medicine down Mark.
>
> Jan, I have never mentioned your family in a negative manner. You have
> repeatedly done so regarding mine.
>
> A retraction is in order.

Jan feels

There's another reason for the purpose of this ng.

For [censored] to tell how others feel, while being a part of the *gang* who
transfer their EXACT behavior to others.

Michele, the cranky [censored], can prepare the spoon of sugar to wash Mark's
medicine down.

What a group.

Jan

Gee Jan, 2 posts that repeat the same old paranoic nonsense you always
spew here. "Us against Them", conspiracies abounding, blah, blah,
blah.

You've whined & acted outraged that some posters mentioned things
about your neglect of your parents, yet you feel perfectly comfortable
using other people's family members in your attempts to belittle them.
You've demonstrated the very essence of the word "hypocritical" by
doing so. *You've* proven that you feel justified in doing so.
Nobody has to guess or wonder or figure out that you feel what you do
is okay, but that others doing the same thing are some sort of evil
"gang". For the love of the faith you falsely claim to follow -- YOU
have told us this! Are you that much of a simpleton that you think
your own words don't spell it out???

Sometimes I actually almost feel pity for you -- your stupidity &
denial of reality must be a tremendous burden for you & your family to
deal with. But then I remember your disgusting religious intolerance,
your clear-to-the-bone hypocrisy, & your inability to do much but
complain without doing a damn thing to change what you complain about
-- & I'm grateful that you are as dumb as a stump. At least it limits
the damage your nastiness can inflict on others.

Continue to post articles you don't understand, Jan. Mis-use &
butcher words like "ego" & "voila". Pretend to be a pious person of
good character while most of your posts prove otherwise. Such habits
make it easy to spot you for the ineffective loon you are.

Bravo! <Much Applause> Encore!!! Encore!!! Encore!!!!

Quoted message said:

Michele
I ENJOY being a cranky [censored].

(Jan) said:

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Jan: A retraction is appropriate
From: [email hidden] (Michele)
Date: 1/22/2004 4:45 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

[email hidden] (DEBBEE1023) wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

<< Jan feels that mentioning the family members of posters she disagrees
with is perfectly appropriate -- all the while [censored] & whining when
the tables are turned on her. It's part of her hypocritical,
nauseating, pseudo-religious "charm"........ >>

Hey, Michele....what exactly is *your charm*?
Other than being the self proclaimed " cranky [censored]"?

Gee DEBBEE -- in contrast to yourself & Jan

Here we go, [censored], [censored], [censored].

Quoted message said:

I don't expect special
treatment from others

Neither do I.

Quoted message said:

I don't make up one set of standards for myself & another for other people.

Indeed, you are a perfect [censored].

Jan

PS. People don't really like [censored].

Personal Experience, no doubt.
--

"I can dance on the head of a pin as well"
-Yoshimo

Quoted message said:

From: WB [email hidden]
Date: 1/24/2004 8:44 PM Pacific

Quoted message said:

Personal Experience, no doubt.
--

One line troll.

Jan

<<
Sometimes I actually almost feel pity for you -- your stupidity &
denial of reality must be a tremendous burden for you & your family to
deal with. >>

Don't pity Jan...pity yourself.....

<< I'm grateful that you are as dumb as a stump. >>

I bet Jan's grateful she is not related to you!!

"If you're gonna walk on thin ice, you may as well dance." (Jessie Winchester).

[email hidden] (DEBBEE1023) wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

<<
Sometimes I actually almost feel pity for you -- your stupidity &
denial of reality must be a tremendous burden for you & your family to
deal with. >>

Don't pity Jan...pity yourself.....

That's the *best* you can do??? [censored], your writing skills are the
lamest I've ever come across -- & to think they reflect your wit &
intelligence makes me pity you even more than Jan.

Quoted message said:

<< I'm grateful that you are as dumb as a stump. >>

I bet Jan's grateful she is not related to you!!

No doubt. My family would have beat a hypocritical idiot like Jan to
death YEARS ago.

They would've sold you to a circus.

Michel
I ENJOY being a cranky [censored].