Road Cycling · Public discussion

isnt it funny...

Started by Michael Pitt · · Last activity · 10 posts · 783 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
23 May 2003
Last activity
26 May 2003
Original author
Michael Pitt
Posts
10
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
783
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–10 of 10
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. isn´t it funny that both leaders in giro were punished for doping are leading again....

  2. Michael Pitt said:

    isn´t it funny that both leaders in giro were punished for doping are leading again....

    Goes to show that doping has very little net result on races.

  3. In article <[email hidden]>, Ewoud Dronkert

    Quoted message said:
    Michael Pitt said:

    isn´t it funny that both leaders in giro were punished for doping are leading again....

    Goes to show that doping has very little net result on races.

    Goes to show the doping Simoni did was meaningless for his performance and Garzelli's was from
    tainted chicken of a drug that really is meaningless.

    -WG

  4. I think it is fricken hilarious.......

    "Ewoud Dronkert" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Michael Pitt said:

    isn´t it funny that both leaders in giro were punished for doping are leading again....

    Goes to show that doping has very little net result on races.

  5. warren <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>, Ewoud Dronkert

    Quoted message said:
    Michael Pitt said:

    isn´t it funny that both leaders in giro were punished for doping are leading again....

    Goes to show that doping has very little net result on races.

    Goes to show the doping Simoni did was meaningless for his performance and Garzelli's was from
    tainted chicken of a drug that really is meaningless.

    -WG

    Actually, it doesn't 'go to show' anything. You don't know if they were doping then. You don't know
    if they are doping now. Nor do you know the doping habits of their competition.

    Why does everyone in cycling think they can ferret out who is doping, when they are doping, and
    whether it works or not, when nobody knows what anyone is actually doing?

    -RJ

  6. Michael Pitt said:

    isn´t it funny that both leaders in giro were punished for doping are leading again....

    In fact Simoni was never punished. His team convinced him to withdraw. Later, he was acquitted from
    any doping charge.

  7. "Davide Tosi" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Michael Pitt said:

    isn´t it funny that both leaders in giro were punished for doping are leading again....

    In fact Simoni was never punished. His team convinced him to withdraw. Later, he was acquitted
    from any doping charge.

    I think that you may be correct, he actually overdosed on Padan food!

    Hawke

  8. Quoted message said:

    isn´t it funny that both leaders in giro were punished for doping are leading again....

    Even better: look at the top10: Simoni, Garzelli, Rumsas, Casagrande, Pantani (i'm not sure about
    totschnig)

  9. "Kenny" <[email hidden]> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    isn´t it funny that both leaders in giro were punished for doping are leading again....

    Even better: look at the top10: Simoni, Garzelli, Rumsas, Casagrande, Pantani (i'm not sure about
    totschnig)

    you´re so right.... i´m afraid trouble started really when Indurain retired...

  10. "Ronaldo Jeremiah" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Actually, it doesn't 'go to show' anything. You don't know if they were doping then. You don't
    know if they are doping now. Nor do you know the doping habits of their competition.

    Renaldo Jeremiah is correct.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.