psychological disorder--or a behavioral choice, or a mixture
of both. To
this, I'd like to offer some observations.
ranges anywhere from 2 to 20% of the human population.
Whatever number
hair must be recessive.
3) Most mainstream biologists now believe that the
primary driver of
genetic traits for the furtherance and development of a
species. In a
Diversity" Bruce Bagemihl bucks this reasoning with a
plethora of
non-functional (non-reproductive) nature as a biological
fact that must be accepted. After much effort, however, even
Bagemihl punts, knowing he stands on shaky ground: "Nothing,
in the end, has really been explained--and rightly so, for
it was sensible explanations that ran aground in the first
place." No sensible, explanation. Oh, well. So much for
science and being able to make any claims as to whether
Bagemihl's observations notwithstanding, when we add 1+2+3,
we have a significant scientific hurdle with regards to the
passing on of the
gene be passed on--in increasing numbers, it seems, as the
political winds change--through a biological mixture of
individuals expressing
like cistic fibrosis, an abherration that negatively impacts
the gene pool? That wouldn't work, would it? Yet again, how
can a gene that leads to non-reproduction prove functional
in the natural selection process?
hard case proving itself as "natural". Either that, or well-
established evolutionary science must become non-sensical.
Let us, for the sake of argument, however, assume the
natural
incest, which, by the way, also has a negative impact on the
passing on of traits for the sake of furthering and
developing the species. Add rape to the list, while we are
at it. Must we, as humans, accept and
mammalian cousins?
With regards to passed on traits, we find that society does
not by default endorse every behavior that arises [arguably]
from inherited genetics. Studies suggest some individuals
are more genetically predisposed to violent or addictive
behavior, yet society does not condone either, whether
learned, willed or inherited. Rather, society judges whether
a behavior is detrimental or helpful to its survival. In the
case of marriage, society has for centuries upheld the
obvious, and that which our greatest scientific discoveries
now seems to uphold:
species. Conversely, society has made the opposite
determination with
common sense.
--
ø¤º°`°º¤ø,,,,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,,,,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,,,,ø¤º°`°º¤ø¤º°`°º¤ø,,,-
,ø¤º eNo "If you can't go fast, go long." ø¤º°`°º¤ø,,,,ø¤º°-
`°º¤ø,,,,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,,,,ø¤º°`°º¤ø¤º°`°º¤ø,,,,ø¤º