.....or maybe it's cleverly disguised comedy? Remember awhile back when Nashbar was clearing out MA-40s? The caption read: "these won't last long". Hmmm...... ;-)
... or maybe it's cleverly disguised comedy? Remember awhile back when Nashbar was clearing out MA-40s? The caption read: "these won't last long". Hmmm... ;-)
The MA-3 was a dud anyway, having no sockets to distribute load to the inner wall of the rim. That's why they broke out around spoke holes. I don't see why the MA-2 is not returned to the market. Now that IS a bomb proof rim.
... or maybe it's cleverly disguised comedy? Remember awhile back when Nashbar was clearing out MA-40s? The caption read: "these won't last long". Hmmm... ;-)
The MA-3 was a dud anyway, having no sockets to distribute load to the inner wall of the rim. That's why they broke out around spoke holes. I don't see why the MA-2 is not returned to the market. Now that IS a bomb proof rim.
I know MA3s have been (mercifully) discontinued; I was commenting on the "renowned for it's bomber sturdiness and lightweight" part. I wonder if there is some in house irony at work in the Nashbar copy department (e.g., MA-40s "won't last long'😉. Sorry if I wasn't clear.
....or maybe it's cleverly disguised comedy? Remember awhile back when Nashbar was clearing out MA-40s? The caption read: "these won't last long". Hmmm...... ;-)
They didn't really discontinue the MA-3...they made it stronger after many had eyelets pull out and have renamed it the OpenSport.....
The MA-3 was a dud anyway, having no sockets to distribute load to the inner wall of the rim. That's why they broke out around spoke holes.
Quoted message said:
They replaced it by the "OpenSport" featuring at least eyelet, not sure if those are sockets...
Those are eyelets, not sockets. Sockets are cups that rest on the inner floor of the rim and an the outer and are held in place by an eyelet. Somehow the rim business decided that all the good rims of the past that had this feature and never cracked around spoke hole were wrong. So now we have rims that crack and have spokes break out of rims.
Deep aero rims are structurally able to handle these loads without sockets, but then they weigh proportionately more for all the extra cross section that doesn't do any good anyway other than make the bicycle handle poorly in crosswinds.
....or maybe it's cleverly disguised comedy? Remember awhile back when Nashbar was clearing out MA-40s? The caption read: "these won't last long". Hmmm...... ;-)
They didn't really discontinue the MA-3...they made it stronger after many had eyelets pull out and have renamed it the OpenSport.....
I was really commenting on the description: "the legendary MA3, renowned for it's bomber sturdiness and lightweight". I wonder if that was a bit "tongue in cheek", or was it serious?
I guess I didn't make that clear in the original post.
"Mavic discontinued the legendary MA3, renowned for it's bomber sturdiness and lightweight":
Perhaps they are commenting honestly, but aren't saying *which* bomber is being used for the comparison. There have been a few designs of that type of aircraft whose airworthiness was questionable at best.
-- Typoes are a feature, not a bug. Some gardening required to reply via email. Words processed in a facility that contains nuts.
> "Mavic discontinued the legendary MA3, renowned for it's bomber > sturdiness and lightweight":
Perhaps they are commenting honestly, but aren't saying *which* bomber is being used for the comparison. There have been a few designs of that type of aircraft whose airworthiness was questionable at best.
Hmmm......good point. The WWII era B-26 comes to mind.....
And, the comment regarding those clearance MA-40s ("these won't last long"😉 makes me think a prankster may be at work. ;-)
....or maybe it's cleverly disguised comedy? Remember awhile back when Nashbar was clearing out MA-40s? The caption read: "these won't last long". Hmmm...... ;-)
They didn't really discontinue the MA-3...they made it stronger after many had eyelets pull out and have renamed it the OpenSport.....
I was really commenting on the description: "the legendary MA3, renowned for it's bomber sturdiness and lightweight". I wonder if that was a bit "tongue in cheek", or was it serious?
I guess I didn't make that clear in the original post.
Oh, it was quite clear to me. When the jokes get subtler, they become easier to miss; particularly if someone is speed reading. "Won't last long."
... or maybe it's cleverly disguised comedy? Remember awhile back when Nashbar was clearing out MA-40s? The caption read: "these won't last long". Hmmm... ;-)
If you look around, you can often get Ultegra/OpenPro/DT-DB at that price.
Quoted message said:
The MA-3 was a dud anyway, having no sockets to distribute load to the inner wall of the rim. That's why they broke out around spoke holes. I don't see why the MA-2 is not returned to the market. Now that IS a bomb proof rim.
However it's made, the CXP33 seems really sturdy too.
Deep aero rims are structurally able to handle these loads without sockets, but then they weigh proportionately more for all the extra cross section that doesn't do any good anyway other than make the bicycle handle poorly in crosswinds.
Semi-aero, ~25mm depth rims such as the CXP33 or the Sun Venus I'm riding now (Rolf Sestriere) are only an ounce heavier, and have no significant handling problems.
Now, if we could only get them in plain, polished silver!
I know MA3s have been (mercifully) discontinued; I was commenting on the "renowned for it's bomber sturdiness and lightweight" part. I wonder if there is some in house irony at work in the Nashbar copy department (e.g., MA-40s "won't last long'😉. Sorry if I wasn't clear.
> "Mavic discontinued the legendary MA3, renowned for it's bomber > sturdiness and lightweight":
Perhaps they are commenting honestly, but aren't saying *which* bomber is being used for the comparison. There have been a few designs of that type of aircraft whose airworthiness was questionable at best.
Gotta get with the lingo -- bomber == bombproof, old rockclimbers' slang, now universal kidspeak via "extreme sports" marketing.
....or maybe it's cleverly disguised comedy? Remember awhile back when Nashbar was clearing out MA-40s? The caption read: "these won't last long". Hmmm...... ;-)
They didn't really discontinue the MA-3...they made it stronger after many had eyelets pull out and have renamed it the OpenSport.....
I was really commenting on the description: "the legendary MA3, renowned for it's bomber sturdiness and lightweight". I wonder if that was a bit "tongue in cheek", or was it serious?
I guess I didn't make that clear in the original post.
Mavic is the king of marketing BS, so I wasn't surprised about their silly comment. Seems like a bunch of ski techs and shoe makers are still running the show at Mavic.
> ...or maybe it's cleverly disguised comedy? Remember awhile > back when Nashbar was clearing out MA-40s? The caption read: > "these won't last long". Hmmm... ;-)
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
They didn't really discontinue the MA-3... they made it stronger after many had eyelets pull out and have renamed it the OpenSport...
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
I was really commenting on the description: "the legendary MA3, renowned for it's bomber sturdiness and lightweight". I wonder if that was a bit "tongue in cheek", or was it serious?
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
I guess I didn't make that clear in the original post.
Quoted message said:
Mavic is the king of marketing BS, so I wasn't surprised about their silly comment. Seems like a bunch of ski techs and shoe makers are still running the show at Mavic.
That is the impression I got when the first dark anodized Mavic rims appeared. They started by messing with the ubiquitous MA-2, the rim that practically every standard touring and racing bicycle had and for which replacements could be found in every bicycle shop here and in Europe. Unfortunately the anodizing gimmick spread to all rims and some was hard and thick causing rim failures left and right, so to speak. They backed off on that but we are still stuck with all their enhancements that increase cost of manufacture and price greatly without any benefit to the user. Unfortunately, just as in politics, there are enough users who believe in all the hype about these rim features and assure that Mavic stays on this course.
Mavic is the king of marketing BS, so I wasn't surprised about their silly comment. Seems like a bunch of ski techs and shoe makers are still running the show at Mavic.
That is the impression I got when the first dark anodized Mavic rims appeared. They started by messing with the ubiquitous MA-2, the rim that practically every standard touring and racing bicycle had and for which replacements could be found in every bicycle shop here and in Europe. Unfortunately the anodizing gimmick spread to all rims and some was hard and thick causing rim failures left and right, so to speak. They backed off on that but we are still stuck with all their enhancements that increase cost of manufacture and price greatly without any benefit to the user. Unfortunately, just as in politics, there are enough users who believe in all the hype about these rim features and assure that Mavic stays on this course.
Ironically, it may have been competition that caused Mavic to drop their reliable, boring, everyday rims in favor of designs their marketing department could better deal with. Sun Metal, in particular, was beginning to close in on what Mavic had been doing in the past.
>> ...or maybe it's cleverly disguised comedy? Remember awhile >> back when Nashbar was clearing out MA-40s? The caption read: >> "these won't last long". Hmmm... ;-)
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
> They didn't really discontinue the MA-3... they made it stronger > after many had eyelets pull out and have renamed it the > OpenSport...
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
I was really commenting on the description: "the legendary MA3, renowned for it's bomber sturdiness and lightweight". I wonder if that was a bit "tongue in cheek", or was it serious?
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
I guess I didn't make that clear in the original post.
Quoted message said:
Mavic is the king of marketing BS, so I wasn't surprised about their silly comment. Seems like a bunch of ski techs and shoe makers are still running the show at Mavic.
That is the impression I got when the first dark anodized Mavic rims appeared. They started by messing with the ubiquitous MA-2, the rim that practically every standard touring and racing bicycle had and for which replacements could be found in every bicycle shop here and in Europe. Unfortunately the anodizing gimmick spread to all rims and some was hard and thick causing rim failures left and right, so to speak. They backed off on that but we are still stuck with all their enhancements that increase cost of manufacture and price greatly without any benefit to the user. Unfortunately, just as in politics, there are enough users who believe in all the hype about these rim features and assure that Mavic stays on this course.