T
Tim McNamara
Guest
In article <[email protected]>,
"Jack May" <[email protected]> wrote:
> "ComandanteBanana" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:1a0d9723-a1aa-4394-98d4-acba90333b56@t54g2000hsg.googlegroups.com
> ...
> > I think the bike is an improvement on God's design. Before, man
> > depended on the beasts to get around. Even Jesus rode a donkey.
> > Imagine what Jesus would have done if he had a bike!
>
> Kangaroos hopping are very efficient. I don't know how they compare
> to a bike, but a kangaroo will beat a bike every time over naturally
> rough ground.
> >
> > Which proves that mankind can better itself without help from
> > above.
>
> Kangaroos are produced by evolution. That is why they are so
> efficient over natural ground. Bikes are mainly designed for smooth
> man made surfaces like roads and pedways.
That's where bikes are very efficient, but as you say less so on natural
terrains or, for that matter, even on the typical deteriorating roadways
that 28 years of devotion to tax cutting above all else has left us
with.
But are they more or less efficient than kangaroos? These things are
usually considered in calories per mile or kilometer, and I've never
seen estimated for kangaroos. Pedestrians, horses, dog, cars, etc. I
have seen estimates for but not kangaroos. Come to think of it, all the
estimates I have seen for bikes have been on pavement, I've never seen
one for bike off-road.
"Jack May" <[email protected]> wrote:
> "ComandanteBanana" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:1a0d9723-a1aa-4394-98d4-acba90333b56@t54g2000hsg.googlegroups.com
> ...
> > I think the bike is an improvement on God's design. Before, man
> > depended on the beasts to get around. Even Jesus rode a donkey.
> > Imagine what Jesus would have done if he had a bike!
>
> Kangaroos hopping are very efficient. I don't know how they compare
> to a bike, but a kangaroo will beat a bike every time over naturally
> rough ground.
> >
> > Which proves that mankind can better itself without help from
> > above.
>
> Kangaroos are produced by evolution. That is why they are so
> efficient over natural ground. Bikes are mainly designed for smooth
> man made surfaces like roads and pedways.
That's where bikes are very efficient, but as you say less so on natural
terrains or, for that matter, even on the typical deteriorating roadways
that 28 years of devotion to tax cutting above all else has left us
with.
But are they more or less efficient than kangaroos? These things are
usually considered in calories per mile or kilometer, and I've never
seen estimated for kangaroos. Pedestrians, horses, dog, cars, etc. I
have seen estimates for but not kangaroos. Come to think of it, all the
estimates I have seen for bikes have been on pavement, I've never seen
one for bike off-road.