Recumbent bicycles · Public discussion

Is seat suspension enough?

Started by Optimistx · · Last activity · 7 posts · 1,439 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Recumbent bicycles
Published
9 August 2003
Last activity
19 August 2003
Original author
Optimistx
Posts
7
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,439
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–7 of 7
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Is seat suspension enough?

    It is relatively complicated to have suspension in a bike so that front and back are suspended with
    independent systems.

    Is it really useful and necessary to do so in recumbents? Is it enough for all practical purposes to
    suspend the seat only?

    If in an upright bike you suspend the seat to move softly up and down, you assumably get movement in
    accordance of pedaling, 'pogo'. The direction of forces in legs is down. If the total force to the
    pedals in vertical direction diminishes, the seat goes down. When it increases, it goes up. The
    weight distribution of the driver varies between the pedals and the seat, causing irritating
    movement up and down.

    But in a recumbent there should be no 'pogo' in the vertical direction! ?

    If the seat is prevented to move in a horizontal direction (forward and backward, and side to side)
    but is free to move up and down within limits, suspended, there seems to be a possibility to have
    one suspension system instead of two and get almost as good results as with two.

    Almost?

    The suspended mass in this system is the driver plus seat, e.g. 70 kg, and the unsuspended mass e.g.
    15 kg. In two suspension system the corresponding numbers might be 80 kg and 5 kg (at best). The
    difference in unsuspended mass might be 3-fold, but the difference in suspended mass only 15 %.

    Where and how does this make an observable difference? (feelings and beliefs excluded for a
    moment 🙂 )

    If I in an unsuspended upright bike need to provide the bike with a temporary 'suspension' when
    meeting an obstacle, I stand on the pedals instead of sitting on the saddle. Then everything goes as
    smoothly as I can imagine. If I have seat suspension in an recumbent, is that a practcally
    equivalent system?

    I intend to build my 3. recumbent for casual riding. For that project I need to decide: 2 suspension
    systems or only one?

    When asking this now I notice that it might be possible to observe some of the essential differences
    by taking a 2-suspension bike and add different weights around the front wheel and back wheel for
    the test rides... Sorry, I might have bothered this newsgroup in vain 🙂.

    But seriously, has anyone of the readers tested these differences? Observations?

  2. I have found that my unsuspended Gold Rush gives a smoother ride than my 3-wheel independent
    suspended Leitra. I believe that the difference is mainly due to the Gold Rush's longer wheelbase,
    but the Gold Rush has a much plusher seat, so that may be part of it, too. So your question should
    take into account the bike design you are considering. Oh, one other data point, my E2 has a lot of
    travel in the suspension of its rear wheel, and the rear rider gets a silky smooth ride. The front
    wheel is unsuspended, and the front rider gets jolted over bumps. I would use a Pantour suspension
    hub on the front wheel, but I don't think there is enough clearance between the fork and tire.

    Alan Weiss NJ Gold Rush, E2 tandem, and Leitra rider

  3. "Mother's Cut-Rate Recumbent" has front of seat on pivots and rear attached to spring-loaded plunger
    from top of seat to frame. You-build-It article at:

    motherearthnews.comgoto.asp

  4. Quoted message said:

    If in an upright bike you suspend the seat to move softly up and


    down, you assumably get movement in accordance of pedaling, 'pogo'. The direction of forces in legs
    is down. If the total force to the pedals in vertical direction diminishes, the seat goes down. When
    it increases, it goes up. The weight distribution of the driver varies between the pedals and the
    seat, causing irritating movement up and down.

    Quoted message said:

    But in a recumbent there should be no 'pogo' in the vertical


    direction! ?

    Exactly. The front suspension on mnhpva.orgmarkdawg.jpg had no damping at
    all and a spring rate so soft you could bottom it by just pushing down on the bars. Yet I never
    noticed any pogoing. I assume this was because the pedalling vector was at right angles to gravity.

    To me it seems to defy logic, but several people I know have suspension seatposts, or SoftRide
    beams, on the back of their tandems and say they never notice any pogoing. If that's true, I can't
    imagine it being a problem on a bent.

    Years ago BikeE showed a prototype with such a system, which never made it into production. Never
    saw any explaination why it wasn't produced

    mnhpva.orgJonS.html shows a bike with telescoping seat support struts, with
    automotive fuel line as a suspension medium. As you do up and down, the bars stay in one place.
    Haven't ridden it far enough to decide if this is a problem or not. I'm thinking probably not, but
    might be if you hit a bump while riding with one hand.

    I can't find any pix, but Calvin Hulbert made one with linkage USS with the steering pivot attached
    to the beam. Thus, seat to bars relationship remained constant.

    Another solution might be to have a very long swingarm, which pivoted above the BB. The BB which
    would be attached to the swing arm. This would use almost exactly the same amount of material as a
    seat on a beam, but the bar/seat relationship would be constant.

    I'll be putting a tubular beam on the back of our next tandem with a 2" travel Cane Creek air shock
    directly under Jane. I'll put the pivot about 5" above her BB.

  5. I can offer this bit of personal observation. On some of the rough stuff I ride over, the rear
    suspension on my Vivo is working hard. Even on rougher pavement or sidewalks it is pretty active. I
    have a fender now, so I can reach back and rest my hand on top of that while riding, and it goes up
    and down constantly. Or, I can reach down and feel the suspension pivot point, and feel the rear
    triangle (I don't know what this is actually called - the rear fork) change angle with respect to
    the bike frame. It moves rapidly and constantly. This action helps soak up bumps for my comfort, but
    it also helps keep the wheel in contact with the road, for traction.

    If I had suspension on my seat instead, I may actually soak up jarring better and give me more
    comfort; I don't know. But there is no way the entire bike frame could pivot with respect to my
    body to keep the wheel in contact with the road nearly as rapidly or effectively as the rear
    suspension does.

    I think for just street use, a seat suspension may very well make more sense, since it allows for
    more elegant frame geometries, lighter weight, and greater simplicity. For use on more varied
    terrain, suspesion near the wheels is the way to go.

    --
    David Luecke Ridin' a RANS Vivo (wahoo!) Merritt Island, Florida USA

  6. On the Rotator seat we use elastic cord to tie the fabric to the seat frame, on the bottom section
    only. This works like a simple suspension and gives about 3" movement. Not enough for curb jumping.
    Super on the cobblestones. As a side benefit the fabric contours to the human shape, spreading the
    load over a wider area which helps fight the dreaded "recumbent butt" My 2 cents Speedy
    www.rotatorrecumbent.com

    optimistx said:

    Is seat suspension enough?

    It is relatively complicated to have suspension in a bike so that front and back are suspended
    with independent systems.

    Is it really useful and necessary to do so in recumbents? Is it enough for all practical purposes
    to suspend the seat only?

    If in an upright bike you suspend the seat to move softly up and down, you assumably get movement
    in accordance of pedaling, 'pogo'. The direction of forces in legs is down. If the total force to
    the pedals in vertical direction diminishes, the seat goes down. When it increases, it goes up.
    The weight distribution of the driver varies between the pedals and the seat, causing irritating
    movement up and down.

    But in a recumbent there should be no 'pogo' in the vertical direction! ?

    If the seat is prevented to move in a horizontal direction (forward and backward, and side to
    side) but is free to move up and down within limits, suspended, there seems to be a possibility to
    have one suspension system instead of two and get almost as good results as with two.

    Almost?

    The suspended mass in this system is the driver plus seat, e.g. 70 kg, and the unsuspended mass
    e.g. 15 kg. In two suspension system the corresponding numbers might be 80 kg and 5 kg (at
    best). The difference in unsuspended mass might be 3-fold, but the difference in suspended mass
    only 15 %.

    Where and how does this make an observable difference? (feelings and beliefs excluded for a
    moment 🙂 )

    If I in an unsuspended upright bike need to provide the bike with a temporary 'suspension' when
    meeting an obstacle, I stand on the pedals instead of sitting on the saddle. Then everything goes
    as smoothly as I can imagine. If I have seat suspension in an recumbent, is that a practcally
    equivalent system?

    I intend to build my 3. recumbent for casual riding. For that project I need to decide: 2
    suspension systems or only one?

    When asking this now I notice that it might be possible to observe some of the essential
    differences by taking a 2-suspension bike and add different weights around the front wheel and
    back wheel for the test rides... Sorry, I might have bothered this newsgroup in vain 🙂.

    But seriously, has anyone of the readers tested these differences? Observations?

    -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- newsfeeds.comnewsfeeds.com - The #1
    Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

  7. "S. Delaire \"Rotatorrecumbent\"" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    On the Rotator seat we use elastic cord to tie the fabric to the seat frame, on the bottom section
    only. This works like a simple suspension and gives about 3" movement. Not enough for curb
    jumping. Super on the cobblestones. As a side benefit the fabric contours to the human shape,
    spreading the load over a wider area which helps fight the dreaded "recumbent butt" My 2 cents
    Speedy www.rotatorrecumbent.com

    Speaking from 3 happy years with a Rotator Tiger, I can make a few points based on "seat of the
    pants" type knowledge of the Rotator suspended mesh-seat-fabric form of recumbent seat. I am quite
    happy with both the seat and the bike.

    -The elastic-suspended-bottom Rotator seat is a genuinely cushy ride. This is due to seat seaign,
    long monotube frame design, and and the Rotator's rider position centre of gravity. and Steve
    Delaire seems to have found a pretty good recipe for providing great comfort but without a speed
    penalty or complexity issues.

    -It is a very effective simple, uncomplex, low technology solution to the support of the human body,
    and the protection of that body from small and large irregularities one travels along, through, and
    over. This is a good thing. Burt Rutan is similar in some small way to this in not over-engineering
    the solutions to the assorted design challenges inherent in a lightweight structure like a bicycle
    or airplane.

    -The seat can be very low

    -The seat can be very light

    -The elastic cord will fray or cut in a fall (more like a baseball-style slide actually), and
    replacement elastic cord, if you bought cheap elastic, will fray and break from the stretching in
    the normal course of suspending the body.

    -The seat can be adjusted in a very wide range of positions. The ride can be quite low and stretched
    out. I am always amazed at how flat and low the rider looks on this bike when ever I see someone
    else riding
    it. I possibly have my seat more reclined than typical, but it works for me, perhaps cuz I am quite
    tall, on the other hand maybe shorter test riders have to stretch out more to reach the pedals
    and this is what I see.

    -Assorted pockets for things can be sewn to the seat mesh. You can sew sleeves and pockets for
    things such as camelbak sleeves, thermarest pads, tool pouch, personal massagers, etc. Next winter I
    am doing a pocket for the camel bak.

    -I have not often had a sore butt riding this bike. It was very comfortable the very first time
    I rode it.

    -It is quite conformal to the shape of the rider. It fits you, it is not one of those "you must fit
    it" rigid seats.

    -The mesh is quite comfortable and keeps you fresh in warm conditions. However when you go through a
    puddle, you get a back shower through the seat. SO far this is the only negative thing I have found
    about this seat or the entire bike for that matter -- and it is the only time I swear "kaw-liss" at
    this bike, and I like to swear a lot.

    -I think the seat may contribute to the slightly (and highly debatable) homebuilt look the bike has.
    I only mention this cuz so many people ask me if I built it myself. In fact that is a pretty common
    ice-breaker people use to initiate a chat with me. (I think one woman asked me "patantez vous ca toi
    meme?" -- as you can see my french is awful-spelling, grammar, and pronounciation!) Often, this is a
    cue to accellerate, especially when the ask how many gears the bike has, so I just show them!

    -The metal tubing that the seat is laced to, can be used to hook a large seat bag on to. I took a
    normal "on top of the rear bike rack" bag and had a little loop sewn on each end and hooked it on
    the seat. it looks like it was made for the bike.

    The seat can be fixed or repaired at any place that does sewing repairs, like a shoemaker, a place
    that does luggage or backpack repairs, or even a seamstress. I keep a metre ort so of spare cord in
    the tool kit, and I know I will always get home if bad stuff happens to the existing cord or
    elastic. (especially useful when far from home -- the cord can even be used for towing the less
    fortunate <-extremely not recommended!)

    With the seat's simple, open construction, it is easy to attach a home built tailbox. First, build a
    coroplast tailbox using some free coroplast and a few ziplocks. With "democratic" elections, there's
    an irregular but free supply of fresh coroplast once the vote is over and the campaign signs become
    instant and pure landfill. Re-use! Experiment! Go nutz and create a corpolast art-bike if speed
    isn't your thing. Of course, this might add a bit too much attention for you quieter types since the
    bike already attracts a considerable amount of bystander attention. I might correct myself and state
    that it will take a big bunch of ziplocks, not just a few. I prototype/temporarily rig with the
    plastic covered wire that is available in a roll at the hardware store (what am I talking about> it
    is the stuff like what is used to close plastic bread bags, electronic component bags, etc.

    And now, a digression involving one man's long-time fantasy accessory for his rotator seat. I would
    like to get little speakers (small, cheap, black golf ball sized) that attach on the bottom end of
    the seat rail (on the outside of my thighs) so I can plug in my walkman and hear the radio or
    motivational music. It doesn't have to be loud (and no I don't ride with earplugs, or music at all
    now). I want the sound to be very directional so when they are pointed upwards towards my head and
    ears, no one off the side will hear it, all the sound will go upwards only, not outwards around me
    (so it won't disturb other riders). I'd like this designed for christmas please.

    Digressing further, much, much further, I would also consider, miracle-fabric-enclosed flat panel
    speakers that slide inside my bike shorts on the top of my thighs would be also fine and dandy.
    (Hello mit media lab, anyone looking for a thesis project?)

    All in all, the seat is one of the best of the many good things about the Rotator bikes. (besides
    the seat, this includes mid-drive, low position, monotube design, oss, and for the tiger, a somewhat
    manageable size and length of the bike).

    People ask me, "is it (the bike or the seat) comfortable?" and I reply, it is not only comfortable,
    it is fast. Not one or the other. Both. And that's all I really want from a bicycle, even all I want
    out of life!

    tiger

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.