Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Is a Kara Kum Big Enough ..?

Started by totolacoste · · Last activity · 6 posts · 1,832 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
1 June 2008
Last activity
19 December 2008
Original author
totolacoste
Posts
6
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,832
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–6 of 6
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. ... 'cos I'm starting to get worried.

    A friend and I have ordered two Dawes Kara Kums. Well, one each. They're getting delivered to a local stockist near us, and we're going to pick them up.

    We chose them because we're planning loaded touring to Amsterdam, and whilst I'd originally had my eye on a Surly LHT and had even put a deposit down on a Kona Sutra, the bank manager (I sometimes call her 'the wife'😉 put the brakes on that one.

    So Dawes are supposed to be good, we looked on the Internet, read all the reviews etc., and then went with the Kara Kum. I don't particularly like the bars, but will fit new ones, and a Brookes Saddle is on order, too. I really wanted a steel bike .. something like a Rivendell (or are they alu?), or yeah why not a LHT? But I can't afford it for the moment, and so a Dawes it is.

    Just one thing worries me, though. I'm 6'4", and the frame size we've ordered is 21".

    Is that too small? My inside leg is 33", if I recall correctly, but I'm sure that we can raise the saddle a bit, so that shouldn't be a problem.

    Should it?

    Your advice would be welcome.

  2. totolacoste said:


    Just one thing worries me, though. I'm 6'4", and the frame size we've ordered is 21".

    Is that too small? My inside leg is 33", if I recall correctly, but I'm sure that we can raise the saddle a bit, so that shouldn't be a problem.

    Should it?

    Your advice would be welcome.


    At 6'4" with a 33" leg you should be on at least a 23" (58 cm) with a long (58 cm or longer) top tube, or a 24" (61-62 cm). The 21" is more appropriate for a rider in the 5'5" - 5'7" range.

  3. oldbobcat said:

    At 6'4" with a 33" leg you should be on at least a 23" (58 cm) with a long (58 cm or longer) top tube, or a 24" (61-62 cm). The 21" is more appropriate for a rider in the 5'5" - 5'7" range.

    What would you advise? Cancel the order and use the money for something else?

  4. totolacoste said:

    What would you advise? Cancel the order and use the money for something else?


    Just found a photo of it--it's got a sloping top tube. Since it's their largest size, it might work. BikesNBits.com says it's 58 cm.

    My mistake. Give it a try.

  5. liquor license for sale liquor license for sale www making friends com jeb corliss video jeb corliss video http://xlac4tr.ifrance.com/movieeyecom-2008-12-08.htmstick fighter movies http://hedewayn.strefa.pl/sitemap.htmmardi jacquet mardi jacquet eckerd drug flu shots buffy in the buff buffy in the buff http://vastack.interfree.it/20081128-school-activities.htmlcollege girls naked http://fokrdarc.ifrance.com/20081125-evening-standard.htm

  6. totolacoste said:

    What would you advise? Cancel the order and use the money for something else?

    I would try to get a bike fit on a fit cycle somewhere to see which of the Dawes models would fit you plus which stem, etc. Touring on a wrong sized bike makes for some long days.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.