Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

IRD Cadence Rims

Started by D'ohBoy · · Last activity · 20 posts · 1,758 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
1 March 2007
Last activity
19 March 2007
Original author
D'ohBoy
Posts
20
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,758
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 20
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. So I broke down and bought a pair of these to go with my new Record
    hubs. Got the VSR rear (OCR). I was thinking Aerohead, but these
    have eyelets and are ~25 - 30 gms lighter per rim (per weight
    weenies).

    Coupla people including myself have asked about these before and I
    will provide a series of reports on the build, first coupla rides, and
    long-term durability.

    They have a claimed weight of 390 gms which is closely corroborated by
    weight weenies. I am building these up 32 hole F/R, prolly CX-Rays in
    the front and Laser/Race (ND/D) in the rear as there still is a
    significant differential between the tension ND/D despite the VSR rear
    rim (~25%, according to spocalc). Might as well take advantage of the
    lower ND side tension to use a lighter spoke. Not using CX-Ray on the
    rear as there is so much turbulence already that a bladed spoke will
    result in no benefit there (and I'll save about $1.25 per spoke).

    D'ohBoy

  2. D'ohBoy said:

    So I broke down and bought a pair of these to go with my new Record
    hubs. Got the VSR rear (OCR). I was thinking Aerohead, but these
    have eyelets and are ~25 - 30 gms lighter per rim (per weight
    weenies).

    Coupla people including myself have asked about these before and I
    will provide a series of reports on the build, first coupla rides, and
    long-term durability.

    They have a claimed weight of 390 gms which is closely corroborated by
    weight weenies. I am building these up 32 hole F/R, prolly CX-Rays in
    the front and Laser/Race (ND/D) in the rear as there still is a
    significant differential between the tension ND/D despite the VSR rear
    rim (~25%, according to spocalc). Might as well take advantage of the
    lower ND side tension to use a lighter spoke. Not using CX-Ray on the
    rear as there is so much turbulence already that a bladed spoke will
    result in no benefit there (and I'll save about $1.25 per spoke).

    D'ohBoy


    I will be interested in your follow on reports.
    Lighter rims with the added weight of eyelets does make me wonder how this combination will work out. I have experience with Velocity, but it will be interesting to hear what you think and what you are able to measure (do they really weigh what they claim); how do the spoke nipples align; how well can you balance spoke tension and get lateral and radial true.. especially at the joint.
    Your spoke choice sounds reasonable to me, so it will be interesting to hear how it all turns out.

  3. "D'ohBoy" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Coupla people including myself have asked about these before and I
    will provide a series of reports on the build, first coupla rides, and
    long-term durability.

    I ran one as a 28h front training/'cross racing wheel for the last 12
    months. Eventually cracked the rim around 3 of the eyelets. Not catastrophic
    failure, just started cracking. Probably fewer than 6000 miles, and I only
    rode it in a few 'cross races (I have a lot of 'cross wheels).

    I built it myself, and tensioned them enough to prevent spokes loosening on
    a regular basis, but no more than that.

    Quoted message said:

    They have a claimed weight of 390 gms which is closely corroborated by
    weight weenies.

    Me as well. I have an accurate digital scale (one of my pets has a, uh,
    weight issue), and mine came out right at 390.

    I'm switching back to Aeroheads, which despite (or because of?) no eyelets,
    do not seem to have the history of cracking around the spoke holes.

    Interestingly, I've been running the deeper Cadence Aeros as front and rear
    road race wheels, training on the front quite a bit as well, no cracking
    yet. 28h rear, 24h front.

    N=1, YMMV.

    John Verheul

  4. John Verheul said:

    I'm switching back to Aeroheads, which despite (or because of?) no eyelets,
    do not seem to have the history of cracking around the spoke holes.

    The Aerohead seems to have a pretty smart design, because the cross
    section is such that the rim is actually a lot thicker at the spoke
    holes, and the V shape seems to support the load well even without
    eyelets.

    I'm also building a pair of wheels with the IRD Cadence rims, 28/24
    spoke count, CX-Ray spokes. This makes for a very light wheelset, and
    I'm guessing they should be strong enough for my light weight (60 to 65
    kg, depending on the season).

    Antti

  5. John Verheul said:

    I built it myself, and tensioned them enough to prevent spokes loosening on
    a regular basis, but no more than that.

    Quoted message said:

    Interestingly, I've been running the deeper Cadence Aeros as front and rear
    road race wheels, training on the front quite a bit as well, no cracking
    yet. 28h rear, 24h front.

    Any idea what the tension was/is on these wheelsets? Also, what spokes
    did you use?

  6. On Mar 1, 9:40 am, daveornee <daveornee.2mr...@no-

    mx.forums.cyclingforums.com said:

    how do the spoke nipples align

    I built a Powertap hub last night (very large flanges) and it was the
    first time I felt compelled to bend the spokes at the nipples to get
    the nipples to sit properly in the rim. Do you do this often (or ever)
    with low flange hubs? The rim was a Ni30 (same as Cadence Aero) which
    doesn't have offset drilling so the effect is more pronounced.

  7. Ron Ruff said:

    On Mar 1, 9:40 am, daveornee <daveornee.2mr...@no-

    mx.forums.cyclingforums.com said:

    how do the spoke nipples align

    I built a Powertap hub last night (very large flanges) and it was the
    first time I felt compelled to bend the spokes at the nipples to get
    the nipples to sit properly in the rim. Do you do this often (or ever)
    with low flange hubs? The rim was a Ni30 (same as Cadence Aero) which
    doesn't have offset drilling so the effect is more pronounced.


    Yes, it is pretty standard for me with 3X 32H & 36H builds on Velocity Deep V rims. The rim spoke/nipple holes are snug and there is only so much even a spherically headed nipple can do to rotate.
    You will note in Jobst's book he addresses the potential situation.

  8. Ron Ruff said:

    On Mar 1, 9:40 am, daveornee <daveornee.2mr...@no-

    mx.forums.cyclingforums.com said:

    how do the spoke nipples align

    I built a Powertap hub last night (very large flanges) and it was the
    first time I felt compelled to bend the spokes at the nipples to get
    the nipples to sit properly in the rim. Do you do this often (or ever)
    with low flange hubs? The rim was a Ni30 (same as Cadence Aero) which
    doesn't have offset drilling so the effect is more pronounced.

    Make sure you have the spokes in the proper holes in the rim.

  9. On Mar 3, 7:40 am, "Qui si parla Campagnolo" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    Make sure you have the spokes in the proper holes in the rim.

    The holes are not offset... they are all drilled right down the
    center. I think the Deep Vs Dave talked about are the same.

  10. Ron Ruff said:

    On Mar 3, 7:40 am, "Qui si parla Campagnolo" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    Make sure you have the spokes in the proper holes in the rim.

    The holes are not offset... they are all drilled right down the
    center. I think the Deep Vs Dave talked about are the same.


    Deep V has offset and the holes are angled side-to-side. If you look from the "inside", where the nipples holes are (on Deep V rims), it is more obvious. The spoke alignment I need is in the radial orientation as illustrated in Jobst's book. It is a few degress, in the oposite direction than you would get by "squeezing spoke pairs" for "stress relief".

  11. On Mar 3, 10:17 am, daveornee <daveornee.2mv...@no-

    mx.forums.cyclingforums.com said:

    The spoke alignment I need is in the radial orientation
    as illustrated in Jobst's book. It is a few degress, in the oposite
    direction than you would get by "squeezing spoke pairs" for "stress
    relief".

    "Improving the spoke line at the rim". He mentions that this is
    sometimes helpful for large flange hubs, but it is interesting that
    you do it for small flange hubs as well... or maybe just with the Deep
    V? I suppose it will be more pronounced with rims that have a thick
    nipple seat and a small hole... and certainly the Ni30 having no
    offset doesn't help either.

    Do you use a tool, or just squeeze the spokes?

  12. "Ron Ruff" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    John Verheul said:

    I built it myself, and tensioned them enough to prevent spokes loosening
    on
    a regular basis, but no more than that.

    Quoted message said:

    Interestingly, I've been running the deeper Cadence Aeros as front and
    rear
    road race wheels, training on the front quite a bit as well, no cracking
    yet. 28h rear, 24h front.

    Any idea what the tension was/is on these wheelsets?

    Nope, don't own a guage. Not worth it for the few sets of wheel I build.
    The "enough to prevent spokes loosening" tension was through trial & error,
    if you know what I mean.

    Quoted message said:

    Also, what spokes
    did you use?

    DT 14g on the front, 2x. Can't remember the model, they're the ones with 14g
    threads & head, flat aero section in the middle that still goes through an
    unslotted hole.

    DT 14-15-14 on the right rear, 15-16-15 w/aluminum nips on the left. Both
    sides 2x (it's on a powertap SL hub, the combination of the higher flanges
    and the 30mm deep rim means you get the same angle off the flange as with a
    low flange hub, box section rim, 3x).

  13. Ron Ruff said:

    On Mar 3, 10:17 am, daveornee <daveornee.2mv...@no-

    mx.forums.cyclingforums.com said:

    The spoke alignment I need is in the radial orientation
    as illustrated in Jobst's book. It is a few degress, in the oposite
    direction than you would get by "squeezing spoke pairs" for "stress
    relief".

    "Improving the spoke line at the rim". He mentions that this is
    sometimes helpful for large flange hubs, but it is interesting that
    you do it for small flange hubs as well... or maybe just with the Deep
    V? I suppose it will be more pronounced with rims that have a thick
    nipple seat and a small hole... and certainly the Ni30 having no
    offset doesn't help either.

    Do you use a tool, or just squeeze the spokes?


    Nylon Jawed pliers with 14 g groove.
    Squeezing as Jobst illustrates works well too.

  14. Ron Ruff said:

    On Mar 3, 7:40 am, "Qui si parla Campagnolo" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    Make sure you have the spokes in the proper holes in the rim.

    The holes are not offset... they are all drilled right down the
    center. I think the Deep Vs Dave talked about are the same.

    No, if you look at the outiside of the rim you will see they are
    drilled at a small angle. BUT the ouside rim holes are offset to the
    opposite of the direction that the spoke travels to the hub. Hole to
    the right, spoke to the left of the hub.

  15. On Mar 4, 7:51 am, "Qui si parla Campagnolo" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    No, if you look at the outiside of the rim you will see they are
    drilled at a small angle.

    As Dave mentioned, the Deep V is, but the Ni30 is drilled right down
    the center... no offset. I don't know if any others are. Do you have
    one of these rims handy?

  16. :<snip original post >:

    Got the rims the other day. Haven't had a chance to take them in to
    work to weigh them on our shipping scale, but they definitely are
    comparable to the spare silver OP rim I have in my bike bits pile.

    As for the rims themselves: they have a minimalist look with a low
    profile narrow section. The brake track is nicely machined. The rim
    joint appears to have been joined after machining as there is a slight
    edge I can see and feel as I run my thumb across it. The OP has no
    such irregularity.

    The Offset on the VSR rear appears to be about 3-4 mm, which,
    according to spocalc, still creates a significant tension differential
    between D/ND with the Record hubs.

    A few of the stickers were mis-oriented on the rims. Being borderline
    clinical OCD, I fired a quick email request for some replacement
    stickers to IRD and they were so kind as to send me a new set.
    Thanks, guys.

    Will be building these up this week. Report to follow.

    D'ohBoy

  17. D'ohBoy said:

    :<snip original post >:

    Got the rims the other day. Haven't had a chance to take them in to
    work to weigh them on our shipping scale, but they definitely are
    comparable to the spare silver OP rim I have in my bike bits pile.

    As for the rims themselves: they have a minimalist look with a low
    profile narrow section. The brake track is nicely machined. The rim
    joint appears to have been joined after machining as there is a slight
    edge I can see and feel as I run my thumb across it. The OP has no
    such irregularity.

    The Offset on the VSR rear appears to be about 3-4 mm, which,
    according to spocalc, still creates a significant tension differential
    between D/ND with the Record hubs.

    A few of the stickers were mis-oriented on the rims. Being borderline
    clinical OCD, I fired a quick email request for some replacement
    stickers to IRD and they were so kind as to send me a new set.
    Thanks, guys.

    Will be building these up this week. Report to follow.

    I peel off rim stickers. Try it. Rims work just as well.

    --
    Andrew Muzi
    www.yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

  18. A Muzi said:
    D'ohBoy said:

    :<snip original post >:

    Quoted message said:

    Got the rims the other day. Haven't had a chance to take them in to
    work to weigh them on our shipping scale, but they definitely are
    comparable to the spare silver OP rim I have in my bike bits pile.

    Quoted message said:

    As for the rims themselves: they have a minimalist look with a low
    profile narrow section. The brake track is nicely machined. The rim
    joint appears to have been joined after machining as there is a slight
    edge I can see and feel as I run my thumb across it. The OP has no
    such irregularity.

    Quoted message said:

    The Offset on the VSR rear appears to be about 3-4 mm, which,
    according to spocalc, still creates a significant tension differential
    between D/ND with the Record hubs.

    Quoted message said:

    A few of the stickers were mis-oriented on the rims. Being borderline
    clinical OCD, I fired a quick email request for some replacement
    stickers to IRD and they were so kind as to send me a new set.
    Thanks, guys.

    Quoted message said:

    Will be building these up this week. Report to follow.

    I peel off rim stickers. Try it. Rims work just as well.

    IMO, they work even better, since the stickers tend to be u-g-l-y.
    Less ugly = better, IMHO.

  19. A Muzi said:

    I peel off rim stickers. Try it. Rims work just as well.

    Less weight and wind resistance, too! Hmmmm.........

  20. A Muzi said:
    D'ohBoy said:

    :<snip original post >:

    Quoted message said:

    Got the rims the other day. Haven't had a chance to take them in to
    work to weigh them on our shipping scale, but they definitely are
    comparable to the spare silver OP rim I have in my bike bits pile.

    Quoted message said:

    As for the rims themselves: they have a minimalist look with a low
    profile narrow section. The brake track is nicely machined. The rim
    joint appears to have been joined after machining as there is a slight
    edge I can see and feel as I run my thumb across it. The OP has no
    such irregularity.

    Quoted message said:

    The Offset on the VSR rear appears to be about 3-4 mm, which,
    according to spocalc, still creates a significant tension differential
    between D/ND with the Record hubs.

    Quoted message said:

    A few of the stickers were mis-oriented on the rims. Being borderline
    clinical OCD, I fired a quick email request for some replacement
    stickers to IRD and they were so kind as to send me a new set.
    Thanks, guys.

    Quoted message said:

    Will be building these up this week. Report to follow.

    I peel off rim stickers. Try it. Rims work just as well.

    --
    Andrew Muziwww.yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

    So true! And then I wouldn't go into a OC tizzy when the clear top
    layer on the stickers starts to peel up from lube and road grime.

    FYI, and in case you missed it in the heat of your wry wit, that bit
    was more of a comment on the responsiveness of the mfr to customer
    issues than a reflection on the poor placement of a few stickers.

    D'ohBoy

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.