DancenMacabre said:Good to get your comments Fergie :-)
Heh, kilo's and 1-minute all-out efforts unpleasant? Now you are being generous in calling them merely unpleasant as these are right painful... :eek:
Yep, most of my guys hurl after a Kilo. I get my guys to pace them which I think tends to increase the lactate levels at the end😄
Quoted post said:Slight diversion but you speak of track sprinters focusing on 20-32 second power. Such a range would clearly involve more than just the ATP/PCr system and bring into play anaerobic glycolysis also.
Definitely, especially now riders tend to go from longer out, tend to build up to top speed rather than jump hard and now have a Keirin, Team Sprint and Match Sprint at Worlds and Olympics.
Quoted post said:Yet my impression, both from study as well as much anecdotal evidence from track files of sprinters has been that to do well in real track sprinting (200m & match sprinting), requires a relatively high, not necessarily the highest, 5 second power (or neuromuscular ability or jump if you prefer). Do you think otherwise?
The Aussies chased peak power, strength and speed and became the fastest, strongest and most powerful riders. They just weren't good sprinters. Sure they could hit high peaks but the drop off was huge. They would be down the track for 3-4 hours doing a 6 sec effort then rest 30mins. Close to the key events they would add in speed endurance but it didn't work. Beaten by guys who had less peak but could hold the speed for 250-500metres.
Specificity is just as important here as it is in road cycling. The starter for the NZ Team Sprint just focuses on his standing 250m. Nothing else and as such is the fastest man out of the gate and has just enough speed going through 250m to deliver the next rider. As a consequence in a match sprint or Keirin if taken long or the pace his high (negating his jump) he gets outclassed quite regularly.
Quoted post said:I'm recalling Dr. Coggan's discussion of how several women whose abilities he was familiar with, all had significantly different final times in a 500m TT despite having virtually identical average power for the duration. The rationale for the different final times being largely attributed to neuromuscular power. I realize the 500m is a unique event and not necessarily the same as a 200m, but anyhoo, for discussions sake...
Average power or power to weight or frontal surface area. We had two Junior Pursuiters ride 3:22 for 3000m and one had an average power 80 watts higher than the other. One kid was like a brick on the bike and the others was super flexible and had a very low profile. I train the U17 record holder for 500m tt in NZ and he went through the first lap in 5th place but held his speed while everyone else dropped off and he ended up .5sec ahead of the Silver Medal.
I would say you get what you train for. Train long miles you get good at riding long miles at slow speeds, train for max speed and your max speed will increase. You just have to determine what you are actually training for. Will that max speed or long slow miles actually benefit your racing?