Convenience is a seductive mistress, but can we really afford to let it dictate our training? If external sensors are the secret weapon for precision, are we just settling for a “good enough” approach with smart trainers?
What about the psychological aspect? Does relying on estimated cadence affect our mental game during those high-stakes moments, like sprint finishes or steep climbs? If we’re riding on a cloud of convenience, are we inadvertently dulling our competitive edge?
And let’s not forget about the tech-savvy crowd—do those who embrace the complexity of external sensors actually see a tangible difference in their performance, or is it just a fancy way to justify another gadget?
Are we really prepared to risk our performance metrics for the sake of simplicity, or is it time to dig deeper and invest in the tools that could elevate our game? What’s the real cost of convenience in the world of cycling?
