Road Cycling · Public discussion

Innocent until proven guilty...

gabriel faure · 2006-08-05T16:04:02+00:00

Yes, the French National Anti-Doping Lab at Chatenay-Malabry is totally innocent from having leaked information to the media! Can anybody bring evidence against the French lab? No? On the contrary, evidence has been given that Landis' body contains exogenous testosterone. Can you challenged this?

Started by gabriel faure · 5 August 2006 · Last activity 6 August 2006 · 9 posts · 273 views

← Back to Road Cycling

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

01 / Original postInnocent until proven guilty...gabriel faure · 5 Aug 2006 02 / This pagePosts 1–9Page 1 of 1 · chronological order 03 / Latest replyPost #9Phil Holman · 6 Aug 2006

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section: Road Cycling
Published: 5 August 2006
Last activity: 6 August 2006
Original author: gabriel faure
Posts: 9
Discussion status: Public discussion
Total views: 273
Views / 30 days: 0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Original post
gabriel faure
Archived post

5 August 2006, 16:04 UTC #1

Yes, the French National Anti-Doping Lab at Chatenay-Malabry is totally
innocent from having leaked information to the media!
Can anybody bring evidence against the French lab? No?
On the contrary, evidence has been given that Landis' body contains
exogenous testosterone. Can you challenged this?

Report
Archived post

5 August 2006, 16:30 UTC #2

"gabriel faure" <[email hidden]> a écrit dans
le message de news: [email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Yes, the French National Anti-Doping Lab at Chatenay-Malabry is totally
innocent from having leaked information to the media!
Can anybody bring evidence against the French lab? No?
On the contrary, evidence has been given that Landis' body contains
exogenous testosterone. Can you challenged this?
Yes, correct
It is just one side, it seems.

Report
Keith
Archived post

5 August 2006, 17:12 UTC #3

Montesquiou said:

"gabriel faure" <[email hidden]> a Ã©crit dans
le message de news: [email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Yes, the French National Anti-Doping Lab at Chatenay-Malabry is totally
innocent from having leaked information to the media!
Can anybody bring evidence against the French lab? No?
On the contrary, evidence has been given that Landis' body contains
exogenous testosterone. Can you challenged this?
Yes, correct
It is just one side, it seems.
The side of the cheaters

Report
matabala
Archived post

5 August 2006, 17:26 UTC #4

<Montesquiou> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:

"gabriel faure" <[email hidden]> a écrit
dans le message de news:
[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Yes, the French National Anti-Doping Lab at Chatenay-Malabry is totally
innocent from having leaked information to the media!
Can anybody bring evidence against the French lab? No?
On the contrary, evidence has been given that Landis' body contains
exogenous testosterone. Can you challenged this?
Yes, correct
It is just one side, it seems.

Happy to have you but keep your chauvinism to yourselves svp.

Report
Archived post

5 August 2006, 17:37 UTC #5

"matabala" <[email hidden]> a écrit dans le message de news:
[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:

<Montesquiou> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:

"gabriel faure" <[email hidden]> a écrit
dans le message de news:
[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Yes, the French National Anti-Doping Lab at Chatenay-Malabry is totally
innocent from having leaked information to the media!
Can anybody bring evidence against the French lab? No?
On the contrary, evidence has been given that Landis' body contains
exogenous testosterone. Can you challenged this?
Yes, correct
It is just one side, it seems.

Happy to have you but keep your chauvinism to yourselves svp.
What are you talking about ?
To say that a Lab is innocent until proven guilty is not Chauvinism
As I know.
To you

Report
Phil Holman
Archived post

5 August 2006, 20:43 UTC #6

<Montesquiou> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:

"matabala" <[email hidden]> a écrit dans le message de news:
[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:

<Montesquiou> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:

"gabriel faure" <[email hidden]> a
écrit dans le message de news:
[email hidden]...
> Yes, the French National Anti-Doping Lab at Chatenay-Malabry is
> totally
> innocent from having leaked information to the media!
>
> Can anybody bring evidence against the French lab? No?
>
> On the contrary, evidence has been given that Landis' body contains
> exogenous testosterone. Can you challenged this?
Yes, correct
It is just one side, it seems.

Happy to have you but keep your chauvinism to yourselves svp.
What are you talking about ?
To say that a Lab is innocent until proven guilty is not Chauvinism
As I know.
To you

But you have inferred that LA is guilty of cheating without it being
proven so what do you call that?
Phil H

Report
Archived post

5 August 2006, 21:04 UTC #7

"Phil Holman" <piholmanc@yourservice> a écrit dans le message de news:
[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:

<Montesquiou> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:

"matabala" <[email hidden]> a écrit dans le message de news:
[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:

<Montesquiou> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
>
> "gabriel faure" <[email hidden]> a écrit
> dans le message de news:
> [email hidden]...
>> Yes, the French National Anti-Doping Lab at Chatenay-Malabry is
>> totally
>> innocent from having leaked information to the media!
>>
>> Can anybody bring evidence against the French lab? No?
>>
>> On the contrary, evidence has been given that Landis' body contains
>> exogenous testosterone. Can you challenged this?
>
> Yes, correct
> It is just one side, it seems.
>
>
Happy to have you but keep your chauvinism to yourselves svp.
What are you talking about ?
To say that a Lab is innocent until proven guilty is not Chauvinism
As I know.
To you

But you have inferred that LA is guilty of cheating without it being
proven so what do you call that?
I call it the result of the 1999 test.
Quoted message said:
Phil H

Report
RonSonic
Archived post

6 August 2006, 02:19 UTC #8

Montesquiou said:

"Phil Holman" <piholmanc@yourservice> a écrit dans le message de news:
[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:

<Montesquiou> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:

"matabala" <[email hidden]> a écrit dans le message de news:
[email hidden]...
>
> <Montesquiou> wrote in message
> news:[email hidden]...
>>
>> "gabriel faure" <[email hidden]> a écrit
>> dans le message de news:
>> [email hidden]...
>>> Yes, the French National Anti-Doping Lab at Chatenay-Malabry is
>>> totally
>>> innocent from having leaked information to the media!
>>>
>>> Can anybody bring evidence against the French lab? No?
>>>
>>> On the contrary, evidence has been given that Landis' body contains
>>> exogenous testosterone. Can you challenged this?
>>
>> Yes, correct
>> It is just one side, it seems.
>>
>>
> Happy to have you but keep your chauvinism to yourselves svp.
>
What are you talking about ?
To say that a Lab is innocent until proven guilty is not Chauvinism
As I know.
To you

But you have inferred that LA is guilty of cheating without it being
proven so what do you call that?
I call it the result of the 1999 test.
There was no 1999 test.
Ron

Report
Phil Holman
Archived post

6 August 2006, 03:38 UTC #9

"RonSonic" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Montesquiou said:

"Phil Holman" <piholmanc@yourservice> a écrit dans le message de news:
[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:

<Montesquiou> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
>
> "matabala" <[email hidden]> a écrit dans le message de news:
> [email hidden]...
>>
>> <Montesquiou> wrote in message
>> news:[email hidden]...
>>>
>>> "gabriel faure" <[email hidden]> a
>>> écrit
>>> dans le message de news:
>>> [email hidden]...
>>>> Yes, the French National Anti-Doping Lab at Chatenay-Malabry is
>>>> totally
>>>> innocent from having leaked information to the media!
>>>>
>>>> Can anybody bring evidence against the French lab? No?
>>>>
>>>> On the contrary, evidence has been given that Landis' body
>>>> contains
>>>> exogenous testosterone. Can you challenged this?
>>>
>>> Yes, correct
>>> It is just one side, it seems.
>>>
>>>
>> Happy to have you but keep your chauvinism to yourselves svp.
>>
>
> What are you talking about ?
>
> To say that a Lab is innocent until proven guilty is not Chauvinism
> As I know.
> To you
But you have inferred that LA is guilty of cheating without it being
proven so what do you call that?
I call it the result of the 1999 test.
There was no 1999 test.
He's referring to the "boil on the bum" topical application of
corticosteroid triamcinolone.
Phil H

Report

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.

Jump through the discussion

What we know about this thread

Continue through CyclingForums

Active in this thread