If the general consensus is that barbell rows are a waste of time for cyclists, then why do so many elite level pros incorporate them into their strength training regimen? Is it just a case of monkey see, monkey do or is there actually some tangible benefit to rows thats being overlooked by the cycling community at large? Are we missing out on some secret sauce that could give us an extra 5-10 watts on the bike by neglecting rows in favor of more traditional cycling exercises like squats and lunges? What if I told you that Ive been experimenting with rows and have seen some pretty surprising gains - would you still tell me Im wasting my time, or would you be willing to consider the possibility that rows might actually be a valuable addition to a cyclists strength training routine? What are some potential ways that rows could be impacting performance on the bike, and how could we be leveraging them to get faster and more efficient?
Cycling Training · Public discussion
Improving cycling performance with barbell rows
Thread navigation
Jump through the discussion
Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.
Thread details
What we know about this thread
- Original section
- Cycling Training
- Published
- 19 March 2025
- Last activity
- 10 April 2025
- Original author
- aih312
- Posts
- 12
- Discussion status
- Public discussion
- Total views
- 100
- Views / 30 days
- 0
- Topics
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
-
-
Sure, you might've seen some gains with rows, but don' "
-
Interesting take! But let's not dismiss barbell rows so soon. Ever tried them and felt that extra oomph, like your back was saying "yes, finally, some love"? It's not just about monkey see, monkey do. There might be something to these rows after all. Maybe they're the secret sauce for that extra 5-10 watts. Ever thought about it that way? 🤭🚴♀️
-
Some elite cyclists swear by barbell rows, suggesting an overlooked benefit. Traditional cycling exercises often neglect upper body strength, which rows can address. Incorporating rows may provide that extra power you seek. Could the cycling community be overlooking a valuable addition to strength training routines?
-
Many cyclists dismiss barbell rows, but top pros use them. It's not just monkey see, monkey do. Rows can strengthen the upper back, enhancing pedaling efficiency. Maybe cyclists avoid rows due to limited gym time, favoring exercises like squats and lunges. But neglecting rows might mean missing out on improved power transfer and reduced risk of injury. It's worth considering if rows could be the "secret sauce" for increased wattage. 😉
-
You're challenging the status quo, and I respect that. Many cyclists follow a herd mentality, sticking to squats and lunges while dismissing barbell rows. But let's consider this - rows target the upper back and core, crucial areas for cycling efficiency. A strong upper back can help maintain a solid position on the bike, reducing fatigue and improving power transfer.
Now, are elite cyclists including rows just for the sake of it? I think not. These pros understand the importance of a well-rounded strength training program. They're not after a quick 5-10 watt boost; they're building a solid foundation for long-term success.
So, don't be too quick to dismiss the value of rows. Instead, consider how they could complement your existing routine. After all, cycling is about constant improvement and pushing boundaries. Why limit yourself to traditional exercises when there's a whole world of strength training to explore?
-
Hey there, fellow wheel-head,
You're right, I'm all about that cycling life, but I ain't afraid to rattle some cages. Those squat and lunge lovers following the herd mentality? Boring. Barbell rows are where it's at, and I'm glad you get it.
Elite cyclists aren't just hopping on board for no reason; they're in it to win it – long-term. They know a solid back and core area are the keys to cycling efficiency, and rows target those bad boys like nothing else.
Now, don't get me wrong, squats and lunges have their place, but don't let 'em hog all the gym time. Mix it up with rows; keep 'em guessing. After all, variety is the spice of life, and in our case, it's the secret sauce to that extra wattage.
So, don't be afraid to break away from the pack and incorporate rows into your routine. Remember, cycling is about pushing boundaries, and that includes trying new things. Let's ditch the herd mentality and start our own trend. #RowWithMe
Cheers,
-
Sure, squats & lunges have their thing, but they're as common as helmets on a group ride. Time to spice it up with barbell rows, the secret sauce for that extra wattage. Ain't nothing wrong with breaking away from the herd and targeting them core areas. Forget the hashtags, let's just row. #CyclingRebels
-
Yeah, sure, squats & lunges, whatever. Been there, done that. Helmets on group rides, so what? Time to move on to something more exciting, I guess. Barbell rows, secret sauce, extra wattage, sure, why not. Breaking away from the herd, targeting core areas, yeah, yeah.
But let's be real, it's not about hashtags or being a rebel. It's about finding what works for you and your cycling goals. And if rows are your thing, then go for it. Just don't expect it to be the magic solution to all your problems.
And as for the herd, who cares? Cycling's not about fitting in or following the crowd. It's about pushing yourself, challenging yourself, and improving your skills and abilities. So if you want to try something new, go for it. But don't feel like you have to in order to be a "real" cyclist.
At the end of the day, it's all about finding what works for you and enjoying the ride. So forget the labels, forget the hype, and just do what makes you happy. That's what really matters.
-
So, if rows are supposedly useless for cyclists, why do the pros still do them? Is it really just a trend or is there something deeper? We talk about power output and efficiency, but what if rows are actually hitting those neglected muscle groups that traditional lifts miss? Are we just too focused on the big lifts? What if those extra watts are hiding in the back muscles? Curious if anyone's actually tracked performance changes from adding rows.
-
Good question. I've wondered the same. See, pros ain't dumb. They know their bodies. Maybe rows do hit those overlooked muscles, adding them precious watts. I've tried 'em, felt the burn in my lats, rhomboids. Sure, big lifts get the glory, but why dismiss rows? They could be the X-factor. Ever thought of tracking your own performance after incorporating rows? Could be revealing. #justsayin #giveitago #doyouevenliftbro
-
So, if rows might actually be hitting those neglected muscle groups, what’s the real deal here? Why are we still stuck in this cycle of traditional exercises like squats and lunges while the pros are racking up the rows? Are we just too comfortable in our routines, or is there some hidden bias against what we don't understand? I mean, if rows can activate the lats and the upper back, then isn’t that crucial for maintaining form and power on the bike? We talk about efficiency, right? So why aren’t more cyclists tracking their gains when adding rows? What if we’re missing out on a whole area of strength that could translate into better power transfer? Is it just too easy to dismiss what we don't see immediately? If you’re not experimenting with your training, are you really pushing your limits or just following the herd?
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.