Road Cycling · Public discussion

If....

Started by Karstens Rage · · Last activity · 6 posts · 424 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
1 July 2006
Last activity
3 July 2006
Original author
Karstens Rage
Posts
6
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
424
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–6 of 6
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. The investigation seems based on very sketchy evidence. AFAIK finding
    blood in a doctor's office is not damning. Assume the worst and Jan and
    Ivan are found guilty, what does that mean for our boy Lance?
    Because Discovery/Postal has enough money and power and US doctors
    doesn't that at least bring Lance's amazing performance into question?

    How do we, as fans, get over the notion that anyone that wins by some
    abstract margin must be cheating?

    This is, of course, assuming that, the most likely totally inept Guardia
    Civil, is totally right.

    k
    --
    http://karstensrage.blogspot.com/
    Rants and raves about pretty much anything I happen to be thinking about

  2. Karstens Rage said:

    The investigation seems based on very sketchy evidence. AFAIK finding
    blood in a doctor's office is not damning.

    Why would you think that a number of different riders from a variety of
    locations would all be storing their blood in the same apartment in
    Madrid? Come up with a reasonable hypothesis that doesn't sound damning.

    Assume the worst and Jan and

    Quoted message said:

    Ivan are found guilty, what does that mean for our boy Lance?

    Nothing, because Jan and Ivan are not Lance, and vice versa. Unless
    Lance's mother's name is in Fuentes' book, he is not implicated in this.

    Quoted message said:

    Because Discovery/Postal has enough money and power and US doctors
    doesn't that at least bring Lance's amazing performance into question?

    Did you only recently raise this question within yourself? Better late
    than never, I guess.

    Quoted message said:

    How do we, as fans, get over the notion that anyone that wins by some
    abstract margin must be cheating?

    Many of us here have gotten over it.

    Quoted message said:

    This is, of course, assuming that, the most likely totally inept Guardia
    Civil, is totally right.

    They totally probably are.

  3. in message <[email hidden]>, Kyle Legate

    (') said:
    Quoted message said:

    Assume the worst and Jan and
    Ivan are found guilty, what does that mean for our boy Lance?

    Nothing, because Jan and Ivan are not Lance, and vice versa. Unless
    Lance's mother's name is in Fuentes' book, he is not implicated in
    this.

    Hey! Hey! Manners! Even /I/ haven't suggested Headstrong's mother is a
    dog.

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/

    Morning had broken. I found a rather battered tube of Araldite
    resin in the bottom of the toolbag.

  4. Kyle Legate said:
    Quoted message said:

    Nothing, because Jan and Ivan are not Lance, and vice versa. Unless
    Lance's mother's name is in Fuentes' book, he is not implicated in
    this.

    Simon Brooke said:

    Hey! Hey! Manners! Even /I/ haven't suggested Headstrong's mother is a
    dog.

    Surely you mean [censored] ?

  5. "Kyle Legate" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Karstens Rage said:

    The investigation seems based on very sketchy evidence. AFAIK finding
    blood in a doctor's office is not damning.

    Why would you think that a number of different riders from a variety of
    locations would all be storing their blood in the same apartment in
    Madrid? Come up with a reasonable hypothesis that doesn't sound damning.

    Man, talk about stupid - maybe you missed the boat on thinking? WHAT IF a
    gambling syndicate wanted to screw the odds? What if they planted a lot of
    blood bags of the favorites in a doctors office and put names on the bags.

    Can you think of a reason that any rider would lie about this now? A DNA
    test will prove conclusively if that's their own blood. Do you really think
    that they spoke without legal advice?

  6. Tom Kunich said:

    Man, talk about stupid - maybe you missed the boat on thinking? WHAT IF a
    gambling syndicate wanted to screw the odds? What if they planted a lot of
    blood bags of the favorites in a doctors office and put names on the bags.

    Can you think of a reason that any rider would lie about this now? A DNA
    test will prove conclusively if that's their own blood. Do you really think
    that they spoke without legal advice?

    Tom, you so desperately want to believe that your beloved sport is
    clean. Ullrich has already been publicly asked about his willingness
    to submit to a DNA test to prove his innocence in advance. The reply?
    Nothing. His team had put this question to him. Nothing.

    The gambling syndicates don't bother with cycling.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.