Quoted message said:Quoted message said:The aim, apparently, is to starve the govt. of revenue from fines through the tactic of (I love
this) *driving legally*.
I don't think central government would notice the loss of revenue - the national 'profit' on speed
cameras last year was £7M.
Ah, but having a £66m hole after £73m in revenue disappears might make 'em take note:
"Help, Chancellor, Chancellor, we need more money - revenues from speed cameras are down!"
"No problem Tony, raise the level of fines and deploy more cameras MWA HA HA HA...!"
Seriously though, outside of February do these guys deliberately speed past speed cameras? 'Cos if
it's not deliberate how can they claim they were driving perfectly safely when they miss a bright
yellow 10 foot high camera and a load of bright white road markings? Sheesh.
I also love the way they say the roads are safe to go faster on. That's not the point - it's other
road users and pedestrians that we're worried about - not some idiot losing it on the next corner.
Mark.
(ps - Is it all a big, BIG joke? The website seems serious - only clue to jokiness was "Safe
Speed - A web site that presents an excellent argument for safe driving" but the rest seemed
serious. I think the joke must be intended to be bigger than just the website - they really are
trying to get a whole pro-speed movement jumping on the bandwagon and making complete fools of
them - hope it works!).