Steve26 seems a little miss-informed when he states that "this forum is full of Lance haters."
I think you need a poll to identify those with a hardon for Armstrong. There are a lot of them here. The blood seems to have left their heads for other regions, leaving them incapable of unbiased thought.
I think you need a poll to identify those with a hardon for Armstrong. There are a lot of them here. The blood seems to have left their heads for other regions, leaving them incapable of unbiased thought.
Yeah, but they'd just deny it, or they'd forget and go back to whatever type of sexual Lance fantasy they were entertaining when the question was asked...
Poll is rigged. Everyone here hates Lance Armstrong. If Armstrong didn't exist, the moderators would have had to create him to generate interest. Without him, what do you have to talk about? Landis? Doping scandals? Discovery? Ullrich? Basso? Please. Spare me. Without Armstrong as a backdrop, nothing about professional cycling is of interest any more. If you say you don't hate him, you're lying to yourself. Give in to the dark side. Admit a deep dark hatred of all things Lance. It's productive; it's healthy; it's fun, and most of all, it gives you a reason to care about a "sport" that no longer generates headlines involving anyone actually riding a bike.