I guess this solves it all.

WOW !!

Is that amazing, or what?

I'll be interested to see if Jobst comments on it.

Lewis.

*************************************

[email hidden] (PotatoSmack) wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

achrn.demon.co.ukwheelOpen ↗

John Docherty;

PotatoSmack said:

achrn.demon.co.ukwheelOpen ↗

John Docherty;

I fall upwards onto my hanging sword, ouch!

I would like to see the model with a steel rim. Athough I doubt much would change other than its
chances of survival when missing spokes.

A good presentation.

Marcus

Lewis Campbell said:

Is that amazing, or what?

I see you haven't seen "the Bicycle Wheel" where all this was computed and graphically displayed
about 20 years ago.

Quoted message said:

I'll be interested to see if Jobst comments on it.

The circumferential spoke displacement in the fourth graphic is unintelligible to me. What causes
it, and what is it supposed to show? Since the rim circumference remains unchanged under load, its
spoke locations also remain unchanged, how does this offset occur and why does only one spoke seem
to remain nearly unchanged? This spoke(s) is on no line of load symmetry.

Jobst Brandt [email hidden]

<[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Lewis Campbell said:

Is that amazing, or what?

I see you haven't seen "the Bicycle Wheel" where all this was computed and graphically displayed
about 20 years ago.

I haven't seen "the Bicycle Wheel", which I ordered from Amazon about 6 months ago: The delivery
date kept slipping and slipping until I got the message and cancelled the order.

Seeing as the original FE analysis in the book is unavailable to me in the short term, I was
grateful to see these results. They aren't amazing, but they are interesting.

Tim.

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (grisoft.comgrisoft.comOpen ↗).
Version: 6.0.520 / Virus Database: 318 - Release Date: 18/09/03

Tim Cain said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Is that amazing, or what?

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

I see you haven't seen "the Bicycle Wheel" where all this was computed and graphically displayed
about 20 years ago.

Quoted message said:

I haven't seen "the Bicycle Wheel", which I ordered from Amazon about 6 months ago: The delivery
date kept slipping and slipping until I got the message and cancelled the order.

Try: avocet.comwheelbook.htmlOpen ↗

Quoted message said:

Seeing as the original FE analysis in the book is unavailable to me in the short term, I was
grateful to see these results. They aren't amazing, but they are interesting.

The point ewas that this web site was new discovery. It is not.

Jobst Brandt [email hidden]

Actually, Jobst, I have owned a copy of your fine book for what seems like about 20 years.

Now just because I have it AND use it, doesn't mean that I fully comprehend all the theory
that is in it.

Lewis.

**************************************
[email hidden] wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

Lewis Campbell said:

Is that amazing, or what?

I see you haven't seen "the Bicycle Wheel" where all this was computed and graphically displayed
about 20 years ago.

Quoted message said:

I'll be interested to see if Jobst comments on it.

The circumferential spoke displacement in the fourth graphic is unintelligible to me. What causes
it, and what is it supposed to show? Since the rim circumference remains unchanged under load, its
spoke locations also remain unchanged, how does this offset occur and why does only one spoke seem
to remain nearly unchanged? This spoke(s) is on no line of load symmetry.

Jobst Brandt [email hidden]

Quoted message said:

The point ewas that this web site was new discovery. It is not.

A point made by the original poster; not asserted by Ian, the quasi-anonymous author of the web
page cited.

jeverett3<AT>earthlink<DOT>net home.earthlink.net~jeverett3Open ↗