The EXPERTS, yeah all of you in RBR, don't understand the science they are seeing and cannot speak in intelligent terms about what the tests reveal. They all have an answer but really don't know the question. Is flandis telling the truth??
That is hardly the test of who can be in the jury of peers and it is up to each side to make their case. It will never appear in a court of peers anyway. It may make its way eventually to some arbitrators that may have more technical knowledge than the rest of us.
Curtis L. Russell Odenton, MD (USA) Just someone on two wheels...
On Sat, 05 Aug 2006 09:42:41 -0700, Tim Lines <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:
bob sullivan said:
It's hypocritical for any of us to condemn Landis, because the simple fact of the matter is that none of us know the truth.
Stop. Right. There.
Your condemnation, or the lack thereof, amounts to nothing. It is more productive to examine your own failings than the failings of Landis or his accusers.
OK, I've got that off my chest. Go about your drama, citizens.
Besides, its not hypocrisy. We've been doing the same thing to people we know and people we don't; in cases that we have knowledge and cases where we are collectively clueless. Anyone that posts is a potential target and we've all sullied our reputations (except the true bottom feeders) by participating on rbr to begin with.
We may have no class, taste or judgment, but we aren't necessarily hypocrites.
Curtis L. Russell Odenton, MD (USA) Just someone on two wheels...
