hygienic doctors

Say not the Struggle nought Availeth said:

What is a hygienic doctor?

I have never heard of this term.

Say not the Struggle nought Availeth said:

What is a hygienic doctor?

I have never heard of this term.
concatenated

Robert Bronsing said:

Quoted message said:

You better be careful or people will start to ask 'who let you out?'

Well, I'm not afraid when such an assertion comes from the likes of you.

In general, people tend to respect intelligently written debate,
rather than a one-line post attacking the individual.

For this reason, the previous poster was correct in her assertion that
you would be wise to learn to debate instead of attack.

Hope this helps,
Russ

"Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: hygienic doctors
From: B-Ob1 [email hidden]
Date: 11/14/2003 8:58 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

see below

Marko Proberto said:

"Rich" <,@.> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
> On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 23:04:27 GMT, "Marko Proberto"
> <[email hidden]> wrote:
>
> >
> >"Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
> >news:[email hidden]...
> >> >Subject: Re: hygienic doctors
> >> >From: [email hidden] (David Wright)
> >> >Date: 11/14/2003 1:42 PM Pacific Standard Time
> >> >Message-id: <[email hidden]>
> >> >
> >> >In article <[email hidden]>,
> >> >DRCEEPHD <[email hidden]> wrote:
> >> >>>Subject: Re: hygienic doctors
> >> >>>From: [email hidden] (David Wright)
> >> >>>Date: 11/13/03 5:23 PM Eastern Standard Time
> >> >>>Message-id: <[email hidden]>
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >>>Gee, I hadn't realized homeopathy and (especially) chiropractic

had

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> >> >>>disappeared. I must be imagining all those ads from

chiropractors

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

in
> >> >>>my phone book.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >>You know as well as I that you cannot have a proper monopoly if

you

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> >> >>are not the only choice that people have, especially a sick one.

Go

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> >> >>back to 1910 and you will find out that the Carnegie/Rockefeller
> >> >>medical monopoly ran all the other competition out of business

( 464

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> >> >>medical schools of various types) and then gave the final 60 or

so

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> >> >>allopathic medical schools $10,000,000 each in 1910 dollars to

get

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

up

Quoted message said:

> >> >>and going. Every medical school offering an MD degree today is

an

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> >> >>allopathic medical school. The last medical school offering a

non

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> >> >>allopathic medical education in this country closed in 1909.
> >> >
> >> >Gosh, it just wouldn't be a complete discussion if we didn't drag

the

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> >> >Rockefellers into it somehow, though Carnegie is a less common

touch.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> >>
> >> Translation😄avid knows it is true, but he has to say somthing.
> >
> >Translation:
> >
> >Jan has no idea what they are talking about, bu, when she sees David
Wright
> >post something, she is compelled to trash him.
>
> Indeed. Making gratuitous insults is one of the more endearing
> characteristics of Jan "It is NEVER right to belittle" Drew.
>
> There is one positive aspect of having Jan Drew post here though; if
> someone supports her then you can be sure that this person cannot be
> trusted either. Anyone who reads Jan Drew's bigoted, hateful and
> dishonest posts and supports her tells you much about their own
> integrity.
>
> And you can be reasonably certain that Jan Drew is reading all the
> posts of the people she claims that she has kill filed. The only
> reason that she kill files people is to give her plausible

deniability

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> in her failure to reconcile her contradictory statements that are
> frequently brought up to her.

Agreed. She does not want to deal with some people, thus she dismisses

them

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

as liars, or Jews, or atheists, or EOMs, and, if she thinks she cannot

get

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

away from it, she mentally killfiles them.

WAY TUH GO JAN..LOL! B-ob1

They just hate it becuase they can't run me off, or get by with all their

many

Quoted message said:

lies.

JanLies as opposed to real lies. JanLies are those statments which she
disagrees with or does not understand. IOW, most of the discourse on this
group.

[email hidden] (DRCEEPHD) wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: hygienic doctors
From: [email hidden] (David Wright)
Date: 11/13/03 5:23 PM Eastern Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

Gee, I hadn't realized homeopathy and (especially) chiropractic had
disappeared. I must be imagining all those ads from chiropractors in
my phone book.

-- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net

You know as well as I that you cannot have a proper monopoly if you are not the
only choice that people have, especially a sick one. Go back to 1910 and you
will find out that the Carnegie/Rockefeller medical monopoly ran all the other
competition out of business ( 464 medical schools of various types) and then
gave the final 60 or so allopathic medical schools $10,000,000 each in 1910
dollars to get up and going. Every medical school offering an MD degree today
is an allopathic medical school. The last medical school offering a non
allopathic medical education in this country closed in 1909.

Ummm...are you forgetting about osteopathic schools? Osteopaths have
the same rights, opportunities and obligations as allopaths. They
have somewhat different training and can offer somewhat different
therapies, and they'll be quick to point out that they aren't
allopaths.

They are able to be board certified in any medical speciality, and are
subject to peer review and censure for acting flaky -- something
naturopaths and chiros needn't worry about, BTW.

Mark, MD

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: hygienic doctors
From: [email hidden] (Mark)
Date: 11/16/2003 1:14 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

[email hidden] (DRCEEPHD) wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: hygienic doctors
From: [email hidden] (David Wright)
Date: 11/13/03 5:23 PM Eastern Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

Gee, I hadn't realized homeopathy and (especially) chiropractic had
disappeared. I must be imagining all those ads from chiropractors in
my phone book.

-- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net

You know as well as I that you cannot have a proper monopoly if you are not

the

Quoted message said:

only choice that people have, especially a sick one. Go back to 1910 and

you

Quoted message said:

will find out that the Carnegie/Rockefeller medical monopoly ran all the

other

Quoted message said:

competition out of business ( 464 medical schools of various types) and

then

Quoted message said:

gave the final 60 or so allopathic medical schools $10,000,000 each in 1910
dollars to get up and going. Every medical school offering an MD degree

today

Quoted message said:

is an allopathic medical school. The last medical school offering a non
allopathic medical education in this country closed in 1909.

Ummm...are you forgetting about osteopathic schools? Osteopaths have
the same rights, opportunities and obligations as allopaths. They
have somewhat different training and can offer somewhat different
therapies, and they'll be quick to point out that they aren't
allopaths.

They are able to be board certified in any medical speciality, and are
subject to peer review and censure for acting flaky -- something
naturopaths and chiros needn't worry about, BTW.

Mark, MD

Add Stephen Barrett to this list.

Thank Ya.

Jan

Rich is a cyberstalker and he has been stalking Jan for a long time. John Bain

"Robert Bronsing" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Who let this pixie out?

Robert, your responses are getting more and more inane - not to
mention the quips beneath your signature, which are almost
meaningless.

That they have no meaning to you says more about your worldview than it does
about mine.

Yeah ok. But who says drcphd is a pixie, and what do you mean by
pixie?
You make it sound like he lives in fairyland, which is a good
description for people who believe conventional medicine is any good.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

You better be careful or people will start to ask 'who let you out?'

Well, I'm not afraid when such an assertion comes from the likes of you.

I thought you'd be afraid that I might jump through the computer and
bite you.
"The likes of me" - what is that supposed to mean? What about the
likes of you with your "it all makes sense in dollars and cents".

If you are so cynical why can't you see through the how codex is being
manipulated to squeeze out herbs, vitamins and alternative remedies?
You sound like you can see what's going on, but all the time you stick
close to conventional medicine.

Carole
http://www.austarmetro.com.au/~hubbca/illuminati.htm

Say not the Struggle nought Availeth <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

Why do all conspiracies involve Rockefeller?

As to the dominance of science based medicine, it's not due to an evil
conspiracy, but simply due to it's efficacy .

Yes, it really efficious and effective. Pharmaceutical drugs aren't
the 4th leading cause of death in US, there aren't millions of people
with incurable diabetes, asthma, dementia and cancer really is a
terrible disease - modern medicine has done a MARVELLOUS job even if
it costs $50,000 per patient (anybody got the actual figures here?)
and only cures a small percentage.

And they've spent billions on propaganda and rewriting textbooks to
fool the public. Why do you think media ownership in US is
concentrated in the hands of the few? We do hear in the news just
exactly what they want us to hear, never the correct information -
just propaganda. Big business is only interested in making money,
doesn't matter if the product is any good, as long as it makes money.

Why do you think "cures and breakthroughs are always just around the
corner".

If real cures hadn't been shut down and driven out of town, all cancer
would be cured cheaply by now -- but then the pharmaceutical companies
wouldn't make any money, could they?

Carole
http://www.austarmetro.com.au/~hubbca/pharm.htm

Carole <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"Robert Bronsing" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> Who let this pixie out?

Robert, your responses are getting more and more inane - not to
mention the quips beneath your signature, which are almost
meaningless.

That they have no meaning to you says more about your worldview than it

does

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

about mine.

Yeah ok. But who says drcphd is a pixie, and what do you mean by
pixie?

I said that "not a dr C" is a pixie. A pixie is a fantasy creature. He has a
lot of that.

Quoted message said:

You make it sound like he lives in fairyland,

He does, he seems to live next door to you.

Quoted message said:

which is a good
description for people who believe conventional medicine is any good.

Coming from you, that's advertisement for medicine. The real kind.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

You better be careful or people will start to ask 'who let you out?'

Well, I'm not afraid when such an assertion comes from the likes of you.

I thought you'd be afraid that I might jump through the computer and
bite you.

Sure.

Quoted message said:

"The likes of me" - what is that supposed to mean? What about the
likes of you with your "it all makes sense in dollars and cents".

Think real hard about that one.

Quoted message said:

If you are so cynical why can't you see through the how codex is being
manipulated to squeeze out herbs, vitamins and alternative remedies?

I'm not cynical at all. Just realistic about pseudoscience and conspiracy
theories.

Quoted message said:

You sound like you can see what's going on, but all the time you stick
close to conventional medicine.

That's because I actually know what I'm talking about.

--

Robert Bronsing

Can't you see?
It all makes perfect sense,
expressed in dollars and cents, pounds, shillings and pence

(R. Waters)

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: hygienic doctors
From: [email hidden] (Carole)
Date: 11/26/03 2:43 PM Eastern Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

and cancer really is a
terrible disease - modern medicine has done a MARVELLOUS job even if
it costs $50,000 per patient (anybody got the actual figures here?)
and only cures a small percentage.

Considering the office visits, the tests, the surgery, the chemo, the radiation
and then more "follow up tests" to make sure they "got it all", I thought a
"good" cancer patient was worth $150,000 years ago.

Dr. C. Ph.D.

In article <[email hidden]>,

DRCEEPHD said:

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: hygienic doctors
From: [email hidden] (Carole)
Date: 11/26/03 2:43 PM Eastern Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

and cancer really is a
terrible disease - modern medicine has done a MARVELLOUS job even if
it costs $50,000 per patient (anybody got the actual figures here?)
and only cures a small percentage.

Quoted message said:

Considering the office visits, the tests, the surgery, the chemo, the
radiation and then more "follow up tests" to make sure they "got it
all", I thought a "good" cancer patient was worth $150,000 years ago.

^^^^^^^^^

There you go, flattering yourself again, not-a-Dr C.

-- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
"If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants
were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)

In article <[email hidden]>,

Carole said:

Say not the Struggle nought Availeth <[email hidden]> wrote in
message news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

Why do all conspiracies involve Rockefeller?

As to the dominance of science based medicine, it's not due to an evil
conspiracy, but simply due to it's efficacy .

Yes, it really efficious and effective. Pharmaceutical drugs aren't
the 4th leading cause of death in US,

True. I knew you'd figure this out eventually if you were told enough
times.

Quoted message said:

there aren't millions of people with incurable diabetes, asthma,
dementia and cancer really is a terrible disease

I assume you mean "isn't" there, sorry to spoil your nonsensical
diatribe. Meanwhile, your beloved cell salts do not cure diabetes,
Carole. They don't cause the islets of Langerhans to regrow. (I know
you don't know what that means, but ask a grownup to explain it to
you).

Quoted message said:

- modern medicine has done a MARVELLOUS job even if
it costs $50,000 per patient (anybody got the actual figures here?)

What do you care, since you're making 'em up as you go along.

Quoted message said:

and only cures a small percentage.

A large percentage of some types of cancers, a small percentage of
other types.

<dimwitted typical propagranda screed removed>

Quoted message said:

Why do you think "cures and breakthroughs are always just around the
corner".

Many of them are already with us. You're just not paying attention.

Quoted message said:

If real cures hadn't been shut down and driven out of town, all cancer
would be cured cheaply by now -- but then the pharmaceutical companies
wouldn't make any money, could they?

Right, Carole -- they're all inhuman monsters, totally driven by
profit, and they're so greedy and well-organized that they let
themselves and their families die of cancer rather than interfere with
the bottom line.

What people like you never recognize is that if such a conspiracy
really existed, they'd kill anyone like you straightaway, just to
minimze the chance of being discovered. Well, you're so obviously
stupid, egotistical, and bonkers that they might not bother in your
case, but those web pages you love to cite would be long gone.

-- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
"If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants
were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)