Quoted message said:Peter Cole writes:
(actually just the last sentence, the first was Jobst, the second
Werehatrack)
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:> Here's a perspective that took a while to surface:
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/04/14/opinion/14thu2.html?
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:I believe there is an old saying, "Moderation in all things, and
all things in moderation."
Quoted message said:Ultra-cycling is not moderate. Moderation is boring, anyway.
Yes, and we are all ultra cyclists and emulate Lance Armstrong when
riding. This recurring thread permeates these discussions that are
full of posturing that no one can prove or disprove other than by its
syndrome, especially by a raft of overweight riders.
Now don't all rise your hands at once! I'm not asking for
volunteers.
Who are these "overweight riders", anyway? And what does that have to
do with under/over hydration?
The context of the article, which you should know, since you initiated
the thread, described a problem that surfaced in marathon runners. The
obvious question was whether it was a risk for cyclists. Or did you
have some other reason for posting it? You're not shedding much light
with these cryptic remarks.
Moderate drinking is fine when the activity is moderate, immoderate
activity (which I happen to enjoy from time to time) has other
requirements. The trick is knowing the difference.
Regulating sodium can be difficult under stressful conditions. It can
be hard to recognize the various combinations of too much/too little,
fluid/sodium.
<http://www.ultracycling.com/nutrition/hyponatremia2.html>
You needn't mock an activity you don't participate in, it's unseemly.