Quoted message said:http://www.neoeugenics.com/
1. Human intelligence is largely hereditary.
2. Civilization depends totally upon innate intelligence. Without
innate intelligence, civilization would never have been created. When
intelligence declines, so does civilization.
3. The higher the level of civilization, the better off the population.
Civilization is not an either-or proposition. Rather, it's a matter of
degree, and each degree, up or down, affects the well-being of every
citizen.
4. At the present time, we are evolving to become less intelligent with
each new generation. Why is this happening? Simple: the
least-intelligent people are having the most children.
5. Unless we halt or reverse this trend, our civilization will
invariably decline. Any decline in civilization produces a commensurate
increase in the collective "misery quotient."
Logic and scientific evidence stand behind each statement listed above.
So, what are your thoughts?
COMMENT:
It won't happen very fast. It took us thousands of years to shrink
housecats' brains this way, and they breed at 6 months. So we've
thousands of years for it's a problem, and LONG before that, it will be
irrelevent.
Long before we have to worry about consequences of not using eugenics,
we'll be able to control these things (whatever intellegence genes you
can find, and want) petty directly. That's 10 years off, maybe. The
major delay will be FDA/social politicing, as you see with
"reproductive cloning." But as with cloning, people who want it will go
to South Korea or someplace, until the artificial market barriers no
longer hold.
Not long after THAT, you can forget about natural unaugmented human
intelligence anyway. Coming along is machine intelligence and the
"Borg" which WE make ourselves. The stuff you worry about will be about
as relevent as some guy in 1875 worrying about horse-manure street load
if the population should reach anything so high as 300 million.
SBH