Cycling Training · Public discussion

HR Zones - Guidelines

Started by Nick-NH · · Last activity · 6 posts · 2,093 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Training
Published
27 October 2003
Last activity
28 October 2003
Original author
Nick-NH
Posts
6
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
2,093
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–6 of 6
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. There seem to be many schools of thought concerning HR training zones. There are calculations based on % of max HR, or % of lactate threshold, and some based on a combination of max HR, and HR reserve. There are so many, I don't have a clue which to follow / rely on. I'd be very interested in the models people are using.

  2. I use the BC 6 Zones of training.

    You'll find some info on the coaching section of www.britishcycling.org.uk

    But this will help you calculate them...
    http://www.abcc.freeserve.co.uk/hrcalc.html

  3. Quoted post said:

    Originally posted by 2LAP
    I use the BC 6 Zones of training.

    You'll find some info on the coaching section of www.britishcycling.org.uk

    But this will help you calculate them...
    http://www.abcc.freeserve.co.uk/hrcalc.html

    hello 2LAP, is zone 1&2 that important once your an
    established rider, suppose you can do 4 hours in
    zones 3&4 with no problem. when i ride to many
    easy days it makes my hard days harder, it could
    be mental because i dont feel the low intensity
    has much benifit. (no cycling is called for in the
    80-84% range.this is considered"no mans land"-
    to high for steady tempo of zone 3 and not hard
    enough to stimulate the improvement of zone 4)
    this is from a training book i read

    zone 1 recovery
    zone 2 66-72% basic endurance
    zone 3 73-79%higher-level aerobic capacity
    zone 4 85-90% anaerobic thres for tt & improved threshold
    zone 5 91-100%sprints and anaerobic power

    just like the 1st post there are so many differant do this
    & that as lances book says differant also.

  4. This web site has your basic 'plug & play' calculations with explanations for the various levels of intensity (zones)...

    http://www.xsystems.co.uk/machinehead/heart_rate_zone_calculator_abcc_bcf.html

  5. Nick-NH:

    The best model to use is training percentages off your true maximum heart rate. You can screw around with HRR and other methods, but these values are more problematic/less accurate in my experience.

    You can use many different zones as well, but I find most of them to be more "work" than actual benefit. 5-6 zones to me is too much micro-managing of heart rate.

    I like easy, medium, and hard. Easy means recovery rides, easy rides, etc. Basically, low power efforts, with pr's not exceeding 70-75% of MHR or so.

    Medium means tempo rides, LT rides, TT efforts. Pr's should be around 82-92% of MHR.

    Hard means short, hard efforts like 3-5 minute intervals or shorter, with pr's around 92-100%.

    Sprints are sprints. Heart rate monitoring is not necessary.

    Life's full of complications. Keep your training simple. There's so much overlap of intensities, I find 3 zones to be plenty. The correct mix in relation to your training program is what's important.

    Happy monitoring!!!

  6. Thanks to everyone for the feedback! I think keeping it simple is the rule!

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.