Road Cycling · Public discussion

Howard Stern and the TDF

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 13 posts · 581 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
26 July 2005
Last activity
29 July 2005
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
13
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
581
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–13 of 13
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Very funny this morning. Someone asked Howard if he liked to watch the
    Tour de France. he said he didn't like "Anything-de-France"...Mostly
    they all spent a few minutes showing how they have absolutely no
    understanding of how a stage race works. Robin was the biggest idiot,
    talking about how she watched Lance ride across the line, not win the
    race, but yet "win the race".

  2. <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Very funny this morning. Someone asked Howard if he liked to watch the
    Tour de France. he said he didn't like "Anything-de-France"...Mostly
    they all spent a few minutes showing how they have absolutely no
    understanding of how a stage race works. Robin was the biggest idiot,
    talking about how she watched Lance ride across the line, not win the
    race, but yet "win the race".


    what do you expect from talk show hosts ? intelligent dialogue and insight ?
    they are fools who prosper by taking cheap shots at the rest of mankind that
    struggles towards achievement.

    Laz

  3. listening to NPR the other day:

    Mara Liason, who orates at a high level regarding world economic issues was
    baffled by the TdF and how complex the 'winning' is. Frankie Andreu
    explained it to her but she still did NOT understand.
    I guess I'll get my world news somewhere else if she can't understand
    accumulative time.

    <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Very funny this morning. Someone asked Howard if he liked to watch the
    Tour de France. he said he didn't like "Anything-de-France"...Mostly
    they all spent a few minutes showing how they have absolutely no
    understanding of how a stage race works. Robin was the biggest idiot,
    talking about how she watched Lance ride across the line, not win the
    race, but yet "win the race".

  4. I doubt Mara Liasson, as smart and genus as she is, really knows that
    much about baseball or american football rules either.
    She's an excellent political junkie and would be silly to expect her to
    know anything about pro road racing.

    _KEN_

  5. Quoted message said:

    Very funny this morning. Someone asked Howard if he liked to watch the
    Tour de France. he said he didn't like "Anything-de-France"...Mostly
    they all spent a few minutes showing how they have absolutely no
    understanding of how a stage race works. Robin was the biggest idiot,
    talking about how she watched Lance ride across the line, not win the
    race, but yet "win the race".

    Dear [email hidden]

    Stern is a moron. For God's sake, save yourself and stop listening to
    his pompous drivel.

    Thanks,

    Ed

  6. He's funny. And the hosts of NPR are "not funny".

    I just thought it amusing that Stern gave air time to a discussion of
    the TDF, but I expected nothing different than what he delivered, and
    even that was funny.

    To give him some credit, he also made some good observations about the
    riders being crazy for still being willing to compete even though they
    do not adequately keep the fans away from the peloton.

  7. [email hidden] a écrit :

    Quoted message said:

    Very funny this morning. Someone asked Howard if he liked to watch the
    Tour de France. he said he didn't like "Anything-de-France"...Mostly
    they all spent a few minutes showing how they have absolutely no
    understanding of how a stage race works. Robin was the biggest idiot,
    talking about how she watched Lance ride across the line, not win the
    race, but yet "win the race".

    Quoted message said:

    From your report, it seems to me that Stern didn't see any of the race.


    Otherwise, he would have noted the podium ceremonies: In which US sport
    do winners get to kiss models as part of the official ceremony? If I
    know my TdF numbers, there are more hostesses than racers. So, if he
    had known anything about this, he would have been sure to ramble on
    about "improving" the race by having some girl on girl action on the
    podium, in which they switch each others jerseys, etc.

    -ilan

  8. Ed Sullivan said:


    Stern is a moron. For God's sake, save yourself and stop listening to
    his pompous drivel.

    Dumbass -

    Stern's spew is worthless, but he's actually gotta be pretty smart to
    do what he's done. He understands the adolescent part of the male mind
    and is oh-so-quick to link into the Beavis and Butthead of it.

    I've only heard him a few times and was impressed with how fast he was.

    thanks,

    K. Gringioni.

  9. I thank the lord or whoever is responsible that Sicko Howard is not
    interested or involved in the Tour de France or any other cycling thing.

    He is scum

    <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Very funny this morning. Someone asked Howard if he liked to watch the
    Tour de France. he said he didn't like "Anything-de-France"...Mostly
    they all spent a few minutes showing how they have absolutely no
    understanding of how a stage race works. Robin was the biggest idiot,
    talking about how she watched Lance ride across the line, not win the
    race, but yet "win the race".

  10. On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 20:25:25 -0700, Ryan Cousineau <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    On the other hand, it doesn't mean it _is_ explicable....

    No ... really it's quite simple:

    The Rules of Cricket

    You have two sides, one out in the field and one in.

    Each man that's in the side that's in goes out, and when he's out he
    comes in and the next man goes in until he's out.

    When they are all out, the side that's out comes in and the side thats
    been in goes out and tries to get those coming in, out.

    Sometimes you get men still in and not out.

    When a man goes out to go in, the men who are out try to get him out,
    and when he is out he goes in and the next man in goes out and goes
    in.

    There are two men called umpires who stay out all the time and they
    decide when the men who are in are out.

    When both sides have been in and all the men have out, and both sides
    have been out twice after all the men have been in, including those
    who are not out, that is the end of the game!

    --

    Joe Chip

    h o v x . v a p @ t z n v y . p b z

    rot that

  11. Ed Sullivan said:
    Quoted message said:


    Stern is a moron. For God's sake, save yourself and stop listening to
    his pompous drivel.

    Kurgan Gringioni said:

    Stern's spew is worthless, but he's actually gotta be pretty smart to
    do what he's done. He understands the adolescent part of the male mind
    and is oh-so-quick to link into the Beavis and Butthead of it.

    He'd be good on rbr then.

  12. Quoted message said:

    From your report, it seems to me that Stern didn't see any of the race.
    Otherwise, he would have noted the podium ceremonies: In which US sport
    do winners get to kiss models as part of the official ceremony?

    Santa swimming?
    http://us.news3.yimg.com/us.i2.yimg.com/p/afp/20050727/capt.sge.pnc01.270705193027.photo00.photo.default-384x267.jpg

    --
    Firefox Browser - Rediscover the web - http://getffox.com/
    Thunderbird E-mail and Newsgroups - http://gettbird.com/

  13. "Joe Chip" <h o v x . v a p @ t z n v y . p b z> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 20:25:25 -0700, Ryan Cousineau <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    On the other hand, it doesn't mean it _is_ explicable....

    No ... really it's quite simple:

    The Rules of Cricket

    You have two sides, one out in the field and one in.

    Each man that's in the side that's in goes out, and when he's out he
    comes in and the next man goes in until he's out.

    When they are all out, the side that's out comes in and the side thats
    been in goes out and tries to get those coming in, out.

    Sometimes you get men still in and not out.

    When a man goes out to go in, the men who are out try to get him out,
    and when he is out he goes in and the next man in goes out and goes
    in.

    There are two men called umpires who stay out all the time and they
    decide when the men who are in are out.

    When both sides have been in and all the men have out, and both sides
    have been out twice after all the men have been in, including those
    who are not out, that is the end of the game!

    Quoted message said:


    Joe Chip

    h o v x . v a p @ t z n v y . p b z

    rot that

    I had a couple of glasses or wine before I read this and then I tried to
    read it to my wife and I'm still laughing. What's scary is it might make
    sense. I'll re-read it tomorrow.
    Thanks,
    bill

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.