Road Cycling · Public discussion

How widespread should doping tests be?

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 6 posts · 206 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
2 August 2007
Last activity
3 August 2007
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
6
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
206
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–6 of 6
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. We now know that there were times when Rehnquist was doped, and it
    appears that Roberts may need performance-enhancing pharmaceuticals,
    too. Should there be doping tests for the Court, or only for really
    important things like cycling?

  2. What kind dope are we wanting to try?

  3. Quoted message said:

    We now know that there were times when Rehnquist was doped, and it
    appears that Roberts may need performance-enhancing pharmaceuticals,
    too. Should there be doping tests for the Court, or only for really
    important things like cycling?

    We already know the Bush administration is full of dopes who could
    surely benefit from some PerformanceEnhancement.

  4. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    We now know that there were times when Rehnquist was doped, and it
    appears that Roberts may need performance-enhancing pharmaceuticals,
    too. Should there be doping tests for the Court, or only for really
    important things like cycling?

    We already know the Bush administration is full of dopes who could
    surely benefit from some PerformanceEnhancement.

    What and be better liars, cheaters, war profiteers, and criminals?
    No thanks.
    Bill C

  5. Quoted message said:

    We now know that there were times when Rehnquist was doped, and it
    appears that Roberts may need performance-enhancing pharmaceuticals,
    too. Should there be doping tests for the Court, or only for really
    important things like cycling?

    What about for the lawyers presenting cases before the court. Is it wrong that
    one side may have a lawyer using performance enhancers and the other doesn't.

    Ron

  6. RonSonic said:

    What about for the lawyers presenting cases before the court. Is it wrong that
    one side may have a lawyer using performance enhancers and the other doesn't.

    I do think that some members of congress should take sobriety tests
    before voting. However, the President demonstrates that while sobriety
    may be necessary, it is insufficient.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.