We now know that there were times when Rehnquist was doped, and it
appears that Roberts may need performance-enhancing pharmaceuticals,
too. Should there be doping tests for the Court, or only for really
important things like cycling?
Road Cycling · Public discussion
How widespread should doping tests be?
Thread navigation
Jump through the discussion
Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.
Thread details
What we know about this thread
- Original section
- Road Cycling
- Published
- 2 August 2007
- Last activity
- 3 August 2007
- Original author
- Email address hidden
- Posts
- 6
- Discussion status
- Public discussion
- Total views
- 206
- Views / 30 days
- 0
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
-
-
What kind dope are we wanting to try?
-
Quoted message said:
We now know that there were times when Rehnquist was doped, and it
appears that Roberts may need performance-enhancing pharmaceuticals,
too. Should there be doping tests for the Court, or only for really
important things like cycling?We already know the Bush administration is full of dopes who could
surely benefit from some PerformanceEnhancement. -
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
We now know that there were times when Rehnquist was doped, and it
appears that Roberts may need performance-enhancing pharmaceuticals,
too. Should there be doping tests for the Court, or only for really
important things like cycling?We already know the Bush administration is full of dopes who could
surely benefit from some PerformanceEnhancement.What and be better liars, cheaters, war profiteers, and criminals?
No thanks.
Bill C -
Quoted message said:
We now know that there were times when Rehnquist was doped, and it
appears that Roberts may need performance-enhancing pharmaceuticals,
too. Should there be doping tests for the Court, or only for really
important things like cycling?What about for the lawyers presenting cases before the court. Is it wrong that
one side may have a lawyer using performance enhancers and the other doesn't.Ron
-
RonSonic said:
What about for the lawyers presenting cases before the court. Is it wrong that
one side may have a lawyer using performance enhancers and the other doesn't.I do think that some members of congress should take sobriety tests
before voting. However, the President demonstrates that while sobriety
may be necessary, it is insufficient.
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.