How to progress from beginner to intermediate cycling distances

[sirius631]

Embracing both structure and spontaneity in cycling can indeed lead to a thrilling experience. While a training plan provides direction, unplanned rides can spark discovery and growth. Don't shy away from data, but allow room for the joy of the unknown, as it enhances skills and enjoyment. Variety, after all, is the spice of cycling life .

 

[hugo_side]

Cycling is like any sport. You want to get better you need a plan to do so. Just goofing around on the bike, hoping that it works out, is wasting time. Want to learn guitar? You need a structured plan. Want to learn a 2nd/3rd language? You need a structured plan. Want to dribble a basketball better? You need a structured plan.

If you just want to get into fitness and have a little fun on the weekend, then aimlessly goofing around will make you better at that. But if you want to make real cycling progress you're going to need to take it more seriously.

Now, if you're just an athletic specimen, who excels at everything, maybe none of this applies to you. But for the average person, having a plan is a better way to achieve your goals. Maybe you don't need a bike computer and a power meter. Maybe a nice interval watch is enough to challenge you to make small, incremental improvements.

What exactly is the aversion to a training regimen? I'm a has been athlete so I approach cycling like an athlete. For me it's more enjoyable than just meandering on the bike everyday.

 

[fblum]

The age-old debate: structure vs. spontaneity. While periodized training and interval workouts can undoubtedly yield significant gains, I believe there's merit to the argument that a more relaxed approach can also be effective. After all, cycling is meant to be an enjoyable experience, not a chore. By listening to our bodies and taking rest days as needed, we can avoid burnout and maintain a sense of enthusiasm for the sport. That being said, some degree of structure can be beneficial in terms of improving efficiency and comfort. Perhaps a hybrid approach is the key: incorporating elements of periodized training while still allowing for flexibility and spontaneity. What are your thoughts on striking a balance between the two? ️

 

[ad5at]

So, structured training plans are the holy grail now? That's rich. What about the thrill of just riding? You know, those days when you hit the road with no destination, just the wind in your face and the sun on your back? Can we really say those rides don’t count? I mean, chasing numbers and intervals is fine, but what if you find a killer climb or a hidden trail? Those spontaneous moments can be just as valuable for building endurance.

Isn’t it a bit narrow-minded to think we can only progress through rigid plans? What if the joy of cycling itself fuels your growth? Sure, some structure might help, but can’t we just ride, listen to our bodies, and still see gains? Is it really a choice between being a data-driven robot or a carefree cyclist? Where’s the room for both?