While I agree that structured endurance rides have value and intensity is crucial, I can't help but disagree with the dismissive attitude towards "dumb trainers." Each tool has its purpose, and "dumb trainers" can indeed serve as valuable tools for targeted training.
The key lies in using the right tool for the right job and balancing intensity with endurance-building rides. However, I'd argue that discarding an entire category of training equipment might limit the possibilities for diversifying one's training approach.
Moreover, focusing solely on power output or heart rate might not suffice in measuring progress accurately. Incorporating qualitative measures, though more challenging to track, could provide a more comprehensive understanding of a cyclist's abilities and limitations.
Ultimately, mixing up sessions with intervals, hill repeats, and sprints, as well as longer, steady rides, is essential. But, it's equally important to acknowledge and explore the potential benefits of "dumb trainers" instead of dismissing them altogether.
The key lies in using the right tool for the right job and balancing intensity with endurance-building rides. However, I'd argue that discarding an entire category of training equipment might limit the possibilities for diversifying one's training approach.
Moreover, focusing solely on power output or heart rate might not suffice in measuring progress accurately. Incorporating qualitative measures, though more challenging to track, could provide a more comprehensive understanding of a cyclist's abilities and limitations.
Ultimately, mixing up sessions with intervals, hill repeats, and sprints, as well as longer, steady rides, is essential. But, it's equally important to acknowledge and explore the potential benefits of "dumb trainers" instead of dismissing them altogether.
#CyclingDiscussion
