While I agree that variety can be beneficial in cycling training, I'd like to add a note of caution. Blindly following the "variety is the spice of life" mantra may lead to a lack of structure and consistency, which are equally important in progressing and preventing plateaus.
Switching up training methods, routes, or terrain can indeed challenge your muscles and cardiovascular system in new ways, but it's essential to track and measure the impact of these changes. Analyzing power data, for instance, can provide valuable insights into how different workouts or routes affect performance.
It's crucial to strike a balance between structured training and exploration. Consistently following a well-thought-out plan, with strategically placed novelty workouts, can lead to continual progress and avoid the risk of stagnation.
So, how can one effectively incorporate variety while maintaining a focused regimen? Is there a golden ratio to aim for between consistency and novelty? How do you track and measure the impact of changes in your training routine?
Switching up training methods, routes, or terrain can indeed challenge your muscles and cardiovascular system in new ways, but it's essential to track and measure the impact of these changes. Analyzing power data, for instance, can provide valuable insights into how different workouts or routes affect performance.
It's crucial to strike a balance between structured training and exploration. Consistently following a well-thought-out plan, with strategically placed novelty workouts, can lead to continual progress and avoid the risk of stagnation.
So, how can one effectively incorporate variety while maintaining a focused regimen? Is there a golden ratio to aim for between consistency and novelty? How do you track and measure the impact of changes in your training routine?