On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 20:06:03 +0200, Steve Y <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:The recent debate on cinnamon in Cincinatti chili leads me to ask the
question, how many basic forms of authentic Cili are there ?
I'd assumed the Mexican version was the only one and all others are
derivatives thereof but I am interested to know if others think there is
an Authentic Subset.
Steve
(I won't post my current preferred recipe for fear of scorn and I
certainly won't admit to eating it with chips (aka French Fries) )
Chili (with an "i" in USian spelling) is historically associated with
the marketing of a spice blend for making a long-simmered beef stew by
a couple of entrepreneurs in Texas in the 1880s-1890s. Gebhardt's is
one brand, Pendery's another. Both are Texan, not Mexican. Frank X.
Tolbert's _A Bowl of Red_ speaks of San Antonio's "Chili Queens" who
plied their wares from rolling carts in the latter part of the 19th
century, but the spread of the dish surely dates from its
commercialization.
The pre-columbian uses of chiles (with an "e" in USian spelling) in
cooking are certainly predecessors and indeed necessary preconditions
to the invention of chili, a much more recent idea, to be sure. But
there exists a set of Texas recipes which involve beef, red chiles,
oregano, garlic, stock, and masa harina. The word "chili" was coined
to refer to this class of recipe.
In these dark times, however, concatenations of fennel and celery and
the dear Lord knows what else have been labeled chili by heathens,
communists, and grave robbers. Their sins are unbounded. Their souls
are surely damned. Verily it is evil that they do.
modom