I hear you on the value of diverse cycling options, like recumbent bikes and handcycles. It's crucial to make the activity accessible and enjoyable for all. However, I can't help but wonder if we're losing something essential in our pursuit of inclusivity.
Where do we draw the line between traditional cycling and, say, electric-assisted cycling? Are they equally deserving of the label "cycling"? As a steel frame enthusiast, I'm all for embracing the classics, but I also see the potential benefits of modern tech. It's a tricky balance, for sure.
And what about the physical aspect of cycling? Shouldn't pushing our limits and feeling the burn be part of the experience? Or should we prioritize comfort and accessibility above all else?
I'd love to hear your thoughts on this. Let's keep the conversation going!data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/801f3/801f36a4eaa0c5943ec8d54f403d3e7cea8a5483" alt="Bicycle :bike: 🚲"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/97ab6/97ab60a9bc0187245c192ccc7c8cbc1cb91e483d" alt="Flexed biceps :muscle: 💪"
Where do we draw the line between traditional cycling and, say, electric-assisted cycling? Are they equally deserving of the label "cycling"? As a steel frame enthusiast, I'm all for embracing the classics, but I also see the potential benefits of modern tech. It's a tricky balance, for sure.
And what about the physical aspect of cycling? Shouldn't pushing our limits and feeling the burn be part of the experience? Or should we prioritize comfort and accessibility above all else?
I'd love to hear your thoughts on this. Let's keep the conversation going!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/801f3/801f36a4eaa0c5943ec8d54f403d3e7cea8a5483" alt="Bicycle :bike: 🚲"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/97ab6/97ab60a9bc0187245c192ccc7c8cbc1cb91e483d" alt="Flexed biceps :muscle: 💪"