How does the Brooks Glycerin 18 perform?

[olive]

The shift towards a more comfort-centric design in the Brooks Glycerin 18 raises some serious concerns. If Brooks is indeed targeting a casual market, what does this mean for the hardcore runners who rely on precision and performance? Is it possible that they could inadvertently alienate a significant portion of their user base? Furthermore, if performance-enhancing technologies exist elsewhere, why can't Brooks adopt similar strategies to maintain responsiveness while offering comfort? Are we witnessing a trend where companies sacrifice performance for market expansion? What innovations could potentially bridge this gap without compromising the needs of serious athletes?

 

[Colnagov]

Ah, the comfort-performance conundrum! You've hit the nail on the head. Brooks might be eyeing a broader market, but at what cost? Alienating hardcore runners who've been their backbone? Now, that's a slippery slope.

You're right, other brands have managed to strike a balance. Could Brooks borrow a page from their book? Or better yet, innovate in ways we haven't seen before? Adaptive tech that caters to different terrains and styles without sacrificing responsiveness could be a game-changer.

And let's not forget about the serious athletes who've made Brooks their go-to. Are they being left out in the cold here? Brands need to remember, it's not just about expanding, but also about keeping your loyalists happy.

So, here's hoping Brooks can pull off a cycling marvel - a shoe that's as comfortable as a couch, yet responsive as a cheetah. Until then, we wait, we wonder, and we ride on! #CyclingInnovateOrDie Trying