How do I decide between a bike computer with a single or multiple bike profiles?

[ambal]

What is the point of even considering a bike computer with single bike profiles anymore, given the advancements in technology and the fact that most of us have more than one bike in our arsenal. I mean, seriously, who still rides just one bike these days.

Are single profile bike computers just a relic of the past, catering to casual riders who dont know any better. Is the industry just phoning it in with these single profile computers. I highly doubt anyone on this forum actually uses one of these.

Whats the argument for choosing a bike computer with a single profile over one with multiple profiles. Is it just about simplicity and a lower price point. Are these computers really that much cheaper to justify the limitations.

Ive seen some of the newer computers from brands like Garmin and Wahoo. They all seem to offer multiple profiles, so its not like its a feature thats limited to high-end devices. So, what gives. Are single profile computers just a way for manufacturers to make a quick buck off of newbie riders.

Im genuinely curious to know if anyone out there actually prefers single profile computers. Do you people really not have multiple bikes or do you just not care about being able to switch profiles on the fly.

Whats the point of having a bike computer if it cant even handle multiple bikes. Is this really something thats just not that important to most riders. I feel like Im missing something here.

 

[bells]

"Single bike profiles are not relics of the past, they cater to enthusiasts who prioritize simplicity and focus on one high-performance bike, like the pros in the Tour de France."

 

[David J. Mason]

The point of single bike profile computers is not to be left in the past, but to cater to a specific group of riders. Sure, many of us have multiple bikes, but not all of us require a computer for each one.

Casual riders, or those who only have one bike, may find a single profile computer sufficient. And let's not forget about unicyclists, who only need one "bike" for their adventures.

As for the argument for choosing a bike computer with a single profile, I would say it comes down to simplicity and affordability. Not everyone needs the latest and greatest technology with multiple profiles. Sometimes, less is more.

But of course, if you're a road cyclist with a severe case of tech FOMO, then a multi-profile computer may be just what you need to keep up with the Joneses.

 

[Xeys]

Sure, let's tackle this single-speed steam train of thought head-on. First off, not everyone has an entourage of bikes in their garage. Some of us are purists, or maybe just poor, and have one trusty steed that carries us through all our cycling adventures.

 

[DustBowlRefugee]

Single profile bike computers still have value for those who prioritize simplicity and cost-effectiveness. While multiple profiles can be convenient, they often come at a higher price point. Additionally, some riders may only have one bike or prefer to manually switch data between bikes. It's not about being "left behind" technology, but rather choosing a product that fits one's specific needs. The industry caters to various preferences, and single profile computers still have a place in the market.

 

[Mycophiles]

Do you really believe that single profile bike computers are obsolete and only suitable for unsophisticated riders? It's a hasty generalization to assume that most cyclists have an arsenal of bikes and require multiple profiles. For some, a single bike and multiple computers might be a more cost-effective solution. Additionally, not all cyclists require advanced features, and a simpler interface might be preferable for their needs. So, before we dismiss single profile computers, let's consider the different needs and preferences of the cycling community.

 

[David J. Mason]

Ha, I'm no stranger to the idea of having just one bike and one computer. I mean, I've heard of folks who can't even handle one of each, let alone multiples! But hey, if it works for them and their wallets, who are we to judge?

You bring up a good point about cost-effectiveness. Sometimes, having a single bike computer with all the essential features can be more budget-friendly than splurging on multiple gadgets with bells and whistles. Plus, it's one less thing to charge and keep track of, which is a win in my book!

And let's not forget, not everyone needs an advanced cycling computer that can track their every move. For some, a simple device that shows speed, distance, and time might be more than enough. After all, at the end of the day, it's about enjoying the ride, right?

So, before we dismiss single profile computers as outdated, let's remember that they still have a place in the cycling world. They might not be the flashiest or most advanced option out there, but they get the job done for many riders, and that's what truly matters.

 

[bells]

Couldn't agree more! Single bike computers are like that trusty old friend who's always there for you, no fuss, no frills. They might not have all the bells and whistles of their flashier counterparts, but they get the job done. Plus, they're a great option for those of us who don't want to break the bank on a cycling computer.

And let's be real, sometimes having too many features can be overwhelming. I mean, do we really need to know our altitude, heart rate, and cadence all at once? Or would we rather just focus on enjoying the ride?

Of course, there's nothing wrong with wanting a high-tech gadget to play with. But it's important to remember that not everyone needs or wants that level of complexity. At the end of the day, it's all about finding what works best for you and your riding style.

So, here's to the unsung heroes of the cycling world - the single bike computers! May they continue to provide reliable and uncomplicated service to riders everywhere.

 

[ambal]

Single bike computers are like that one friend who insists on ordering plain cheese pizza—safe, reliable, but oh so boring. Are we really saying simplicity is worth missing out on all the fun features?

What’s the deal with the folks who swear by them? Are they just avoiding the techy headache, or is there a secret society of single-profile enthusiasts we don’t know about?

 

[David J. Mason]

Not everyone's after the bells and whistles of multi-profile computers. Some riders value simplicity and affordability, which single bike computers provide. Plus, who says plain cheese pizza can't be satisfying? It's a matter of preference and meeting one's needs.

Now, about that secret society of single-profile enthusiasts, I wouldn't be surprised! They might just be a group that appreciates the essentials and finds joy in the simplicity of their cycling setup. It's not about avoiding a techy headache, but rather focusing on the ride itself.

So, before we write off single bike computers, let's remember that they cater to a specific group of riders who prioritize simplicity and cost-effectiveness. After all, not every ride requires advanced tracking or multiple profiles. Sometimes, less is indeed more.