Is it really necessary for every cyclist to have a coach to handle setbacks during training, or is this just another way for the cycling industry to make a quick buck off of inexperienced riders who are desperate for a competitive edge?
Its no secret that setbacks are an inevitable part of the training process, and every serious cyclist will experience them at some point in their career. But do we really need to pay someone to tell us how to deal with them, or can we just figure it out on our own through trial and error?
Coaches will tell you that they can help you develop a training plan that is tailored to your specific needs and goals, and that they can provide you with the guidance and support you need to overcome setbacks and achieve success. But isnt this just something that we can do for ourselves with a little bit of research and planning?
And what about the cost? Hiring a coach can be expensive, especially for riders who are just starting out and dont have a lot of money to spend. Is it really worth it, or are there other ways to get the same benefits without breaking the bank?
Some people will say that a coach can provide you with the accountability and motivation you need to stay on track and reach your goals. But cant we just get this from a training partner or a cycling group? And what about the riders who are able to succeed without a coach - are they just naturally more talented, or is there something else at play?
It seems to me that the cycling industry is always looking for ways to make money off of riders, and the coaching trend is just another example of this. But at the same time, I can see how having a coach could be beneficial for some riders. So, Im curious to hear from others - do you think that coaching is necessary for success in cycling, or is it just a luxury that only a few can afford?