Isnt it a bit counterintuitive that power meters are often marketed as a tool for serious cyclists looking to optimize their performance, yet many bike manufacturers still design frames with power meter compatibility as an afterthought, rather than integrating it as a core component of the frames design.
Wouldnt it make more sense for bike manufacturers to prioritize power meter integration, especially considering how crucial data analysis has become in the world of competitive cycling. The current crop of power meters on the market often require additional hardware, such as crankarm adapters or chainring spacers, which can add weight, complexity, and even affect the overall aesthetic of the bike.
Does it not seem that the industrys reluctance to prioritize power meter integration is at odds with the growing demand for data-driven training and the proliferation of power meters in the market. Are bike manufacturers simply reacting to consumer demand, rather than driving innovation in this area.
Can someone explain why power meters are still often treated as an accessory, rather than a fundamental component of the bikes design. Are there any technical or practical limitations that prevent manufacturers from integrating power meters more seamlessly into their frames.