Road Cycling · Public discussion

Horse Regulations??? What the hell is going on here???

Started by Joe King · · Last activity · 10 posts · 516 views

← Back to Road Cycling

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

01 / Original postHorse Regulations??? What the hell is going on here???Joe King · 14 Sep 2006 02 / This pagePosts 1–10Page 1 of 1 · chronological order 03 / Latest replyPost #10Email address hidden · 18 Sep 2006

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
14 September 2006
Last activity
18 September 2006
Original author
Joe King
Posts
10
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
516
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–10 of 10
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Original post
    Joe King
    Archived post
    #1

    He had raised the Hamilton case; there had been discussions with FEI on the
    doping

    of horses, as he had written in his report, where the doping of the horse
    had been

    undertaken by the rider and where the sanction process for that was
    currently under the

    horse regulations and not under the athlete regulations. If the rider had
    doped him or

    herself, the rider might be subject to a two-year sanction; under the horse
    regulations,

    the rider might get only three months. WADA was talking to FEI about trying
    to resolve

    that.

    Source:
    http://www.wada-ama.org/rtecontent/document/Minutes_EC_20_Sept_2005_FINAL.pdf

    Report
  2. MMan
    Archived post
    #2
    Joe King said:

    He had raised the Hamilton case; there had been discussions with FEI on the
    doping

    of horses, as he had written in his report, where the doping of the horse
    had been

    undertaken by the rider and where the sanction process for that was
    currently under the

    horse regulations and not under the athlete regulations. If the rider had
    doped him or

    herself, the rider might be subject to a two-year sanction; under the horse
    regulations,

    the rider might get only three months. WADA was talking to FEI about trying
    to resolve

    that.

    I think it should be illegal to ride a horse in a bicycle race,
    especially a horse that's doping.

    Report
  3. RonSonic
    Archived post
    #3
    MMan said:


    Joe King said:

    He had raised the Hamilton case; there had been discussions with FEI on the
    doping

    of horses, as he had written in his report, where the doping of the horse
    had been

    undertaken by the rider and where the sanction process for that was
    currently under the

    horse regulations and not under the athlete regulations. If the rider had
    doped him or

    herself, the rider might be subject to a two-year sanction; under the horse
    regulations,

    the rider might get only three months. WADA was talking to FEI about trying
    to resolve

    that.

    I think it should be illegal to ride a horse in a bicycle race,
    especially a horse that's doping.

    What if the race is in Canada and the horse has had a sex change operation?

    Ron

    Report
  4. Email address hidden
    Archived post
    #4
    RonSonic said:

    On 14 Sep 2006 05:58:17 -0700, "MMan" <[email hidden]> wrote:

    What if the race is in Canada and the horse has had a sex change operation?

    Ron

    Den ze horse must be a bi-lingual French speaking horse, not a
    bi-sexual equine, you swine.

    Report
  5. Email address hidden
    Archived post
    #5
    RonSonic said:
    MMan said:


    Joe King said:

    He had raised the Hamilton case; there had been discussions with FEI on the
    doping

    of horses, as he had written in his report, where the doping of the horse
    had been

    undertaken by the rider and where the sanction process for that was
    currently under the

    horse regulations and not under the athlete regulations. If the rider had
    doped him or

    herself, the rider might be subject to a two-year sanction; under the horse
    regulations,

    the rider might get only three months. WADA was talking to FEI about trying
    to resolve

    that.

    I think it should be illegal to ride a horse in a bicycle race,
    especially a horse that's doping.

    What if the race is in Canada and the horse has had a sex change operation?

    Ron

    If the horse is wearing a blonde wig, will cars stay an (average) extra
    3 inches away from it?

    -bdbafh

    Report
  6. Donald Munro
    Archived post
    #6
    rjk3 said:

    Den ze horse must be a bi-lingual French speaking horse, not a
    bi-sexual equine, you swine.

    Nay, I mean non.

    Report
  7. Simon Brooke
    Archived post
    #7

    in message <[email hidden]>,

    (') said:


    RonSonic said:
    MMan said:


    Joe King wrote:
    > He had raised the Hamilton case; there had been discussions with FEI
    > on the doping
    >
    > of horses, as he had written in his report, where the doping of the
    > horse had been
    >
    > undertaken by the rider and where the sanction process for that was
    > currently under the
    >
    > horse regulations and not under the athlete regulations. If the rider
    > had doped him or
    >
    > herself, the rider might be subject to a two-year sanction; under the
    > horse regulations,
    >
    > the rider might get only three months. WADA was talking to FEI about
    > trying to resolve
    >
    > that.

    I think it should be illegal to ride a horse in a bicycle race,
    especially a horse that's doping.

    What if the race is in Canada and the horse has had a sex change
    operation?

    If the horse is wearing a blonde wig, will cars stay an (average) extra
    3 inches away from it?

    Horse penises are longer...

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/

    ;; When your hammer is C++, everything begins to look like a thumb.

    Report
  8. Simon Brooke
    Archived post
    #8
    MMan said:


    I think it should be illegal to ride a horse in a bicycle race,
    especially a horse that's doping.

    You think you're joking, don't you?

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/jersey/5337478.stm

    Report
  9. MMan
    Archived post
    #9
    Simon Brooke said:
    MMan said:


    I think it should be illegal to ride a horse in a bicycle race,
    especially a horse that's doping.

    You think you're joking, don't you?

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/jersey/5337478.stm

    About riding a horse in a bicycle race, yes.

    Doping horses is old news. The 1968 Kentucky Derby winner, Dancer's
    Image, was tested and disqualified.

    Report
  10. Email address hidden
    Archived post
    #10
    MMan said:

    Joe King wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    horse regulations and not under the athlete regulations. If the rider had doped him or
    herself, the rider might be subject to a two-year sanction; under the horse regulations,
    the rider might get only three months. WADA was talking to FEI about trying to resolve
    that.

    I think it should be illegal to ride a horse in a bicycle race,
    especially a horse that's doping.

    Given WADA and others' new-found enthusiasm for retrospective
    testing and threatening to revise results of long ago races,
    consider this: if Erik Zabel can prove that Tintin the pony who
    knocked him into a ditch in 2000 was doping, then Zabel might
    get himself declared retroactive winner of Ghent-Wevelgem.

    Report

Keep exploring

Browse the sectionRoad Cycling Return to CyclingForumsStart at the home page Search discussionsFind another thread

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.