Recumbent bicycles · Public discussion

Honest "average" speeds

Started by Robert Siegel · · Last activity · 26 posts · 2,560 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Recumbent bicycles
Published
17 June 2003
Last activity
22 June 2003
Original author
Robert Siegel
Posts
26
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
2,560
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–26 of 26
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I know what a century is. I did a few in my DF racing days.

    But, what is this thing you call "rest stop"? ;-)

    JV

    "Tom Sherman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Jude T. McGloin said:

    ... In my case, I look at the "average speed" which is when you are actually moving vs. elapsed
    time. Rich Pinto at the SeaGull Century. Average speed well over 20 mph. ET 6.5/7 hours. Half
    hour at each rest stop? (guess)

    Half-hour rest stops? Even I usually don't take that long. 😉 At the other extreme are those who
    only stop once on a century for just long enough to refill their hydration bladders (Hi Ed) and
    average over 20 mph including the rest stop (and 22-23 mph rolling average).

    For those who doubt these average speeds, see the results of the 2002 UMCA Championships [1] where
    the winner of the six hour race averaged
    22.2 mph on a Challenge Jester on a course with an average of 35ft/mile of climbing.

    [1] < iowaultra.com2002 24hr results.htm >

    Tom Sherman - Various HPV's Quad Cities USA (Illinois side)

  2. Jude T. McGloin <[email hidden]> wrote:
    : Seth, Hang around this NG and BROL msg. board for awhile and then attend a few recumbent rallies
    : and you will realize who is posting truthful speed and who is full of [censored] and knows it.

    But nobody rides to their full capacity in social events, one always waits for the other guys
    to catch up.

    --
    Risto Varanka | helsinki.fihpv.html varis at no spam please iki fi

  3. Nobody in the ultra fast pack waited for me in Stevens Point last year. Not that it matters I didn't
    expect them to. I couldn't maintain the pace anyway. John and Kevin on AERO and AEROCYCLE
    respectivly alsong with Ed, Alan and other Low Racers were maintaining mid 20's pace. At most
    rallies there are usually distinct groups related to speed and number of stops they will make. This
    is true for most rides. The SeaGull Century and very flat on too. Has 7/8K riders. Every kind of
    bike/bent. Handcycles and racing wheelchairers, fixies (hi Dave) and others. Some use it for a timed
    event. For others its strictly a social ride/event. For many the end of September means that they
    are usually fit and at their peak. My ability is usually its best in the fall. Each to their own. I
    can't ride as slow as some or as fast a others. There are many reasons to attend rallies. You get to
    meet people and look at all gere of recumbents. You also see first hand speeds that are considered
    BS by many on this NG.

    --
    Jude....///Bacchetta AERO St. Michaels and Tilghman Island.. Maryland Wheel Doctor Cycle and Sports,
    Inc 1-800-586-6645 <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Jude T. McGloin <[email hidden]> wrote:
    : Seth, Hang around this NG and BROL msg. board for awhile and then


    attend a

    Quoted message said:

    : few recumbent rallies and you will realize who is posting truthful speed


    and

    Quoted message said:

    : who is full of [censored] and knows it.

    But nobody rides to their full capacity in social events, one always waits for the other guys to
    catch up.

    --
    Risto Varanka | helsinki.fihpv.html varis at no spam please iki fi

  4. In article said:

    I've no doubt that there is BS'ing going on, but I tend to think there are such huge differences
    in mileage being ridden that there will be huge differences in speeds.

    This thread has been going on for a while, and there's something I don't understand. Why is there
    any discussion at all about the validity of average speeds?

    I have a cheap bicycle computer which can be calibrated to the exact milimetre for wheel diameter,
    and in automatic mode, it displays my average speed for every ride, or until I reset it (in
    automatic mode, it does not factor time spent stopped into the average).

    I think it reports a very accurate figure, and there's no fudging or debating the average speed.
    What the cycle computer says, is what it
    IS. What's up with people discussing "honest" average speeds? I'm sure I'm missing some subtlety
    here, so thanks for enlightening.

    Paul Harris

  5. Paul Harris <[email hidden]> wrote in :"]news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>, MLB

    Quoted message said:

    I've no doubt that there is BS'ing going on, but I tend to think there are such huge differences
    in mileage being ridden that there will be huge differences in speeds.

    This thread has been going on for a while, and there's something I don't understand. Why is there
    any discussion at all about the validity of average speeds?

    I have a cheap bicycle computer which can be calibrated to the exact milimetre for wheel diameter,
    and in automatic mode, it displays my average speed for every ride, or until I reset it (in
    automatic mode, it does not factor time spent stopped into the average).

    I think it reports a very accurate figure, and there's no fudging or debating the average speed.
    What the cycle computer says, is what it
    IS. What's up with people discussing "honest" average speeds? I'm sure I'm missing some subtlety
    here, so thanks for enlightening.

    Paul Harris

    Certainly folks aren't beyond "fudging" their numbers up a bit beyond what the puter says. Also LOTS
    of folks puters aren't calibrated properly or are plain set up incorrectly. A friend's and mine were
    .4 different after 11 miles, and both of us had done the chalk mark on tire/roll out and measure
    method that is supposed to be the ultimate accuracy. Using the "stock" numbers for all tires lots of
    them will be off.

  6. I am interested in picking a hitch rack or trailer system to carry a recumbent and a conventional
    bike to distant rides. I already have a 1
    1/4" receiver hitch on my car.

    I have consistently heard positive reports about the Sportworks rack system. In looking at their web
    site they have a nice system for handling the differing needs of recumbent and conventional bikes.
    Before I make a purchase I was interested in having some input into the benefits or disadvantages of
    those who might be using using small utility trailers to haul bikes. I like the potential of being
    able to develop a trailer enclosure to protect the bike from the elements.

    Are their any specific trailers designed for this purpose?

    Don Bacchetta Giro

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.