Simon Brooke said:Yes. With Campag, you can shift either way one or many gears at once.
With Shimano, at least at the Sora end, you can't.
Everything above Sora shifts down up to three at a time, but only one
at a time going up. That said, the upshifts are so easy and rapid it is
a total non-issue. In fact, I prefer it to Campy, because there is no
risk of shifting the wrong number of cogs.
Quoted message said:With Campag, you can
trim the front mech; with Shimano you can't.
Partially true. Shimano (at least on 105 and above) has two positions
on each of the two largest rings in the triple (haven't played with a
double for a while). If you use all Shimano drivetrain components with
the correct geometry of frame and avoid cross-chaining, you don't need
to trim anyway. IOW, I have never found this to be an issue, but YMMV
if you want to use TA cranks or some such.
Quoted message said:With Campag, you can get
any of the parts of the lever mechanism as spares, and you can service
and repair the levers; with Shimano, you can't.
OTOH, ISTR that Campy recommends that you service their levers rather
often and replace quite a few bob's worth of little springs. 105 and
above Shimano levers generally just work for years in my experience.
Quoted message said:Also, subjectively, Campag are more comfortable in the hand, at least for
my rather small hands.
And Shimano for my large ones.
But all of these things are really just hair-splitting. I think they're
both good and most folk can get on well with either, so don't worry too
much about the decision either way.
I am hoping the new SRAM and FSA road groups will also be good -
competition is a wonderful thing! Dunno why I care though, though, as
it seems increasingly unlikely I will ever be able to ride an upright
again (and far from clear that a 'bent will work for me either, even if
I had the money to spend on one). :-(
--
Peter Headland