General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Higher reps, lower stress?

Started by The Crow · · Last activity · 9 posts · 460 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
26 January 2006
Last activity
26 January 2006
Original author
The Crow
Posts
9
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
460
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–9 of 9
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I don't want to over-stress my back, because of an old rowing injury that
    sometimes gives me a little trouble, so I am thinking about reworking my
    squat set/reps count.

    Obviously very low reps are hard because of the high weight, and very high
    reps are hard because of the endurance factor, but do you reckon that if I
    aim for a middle ground, say 12-15 reps, I can reduce the amount of
    immediate stress on my back?

    My thinking is that I will avoid both the extreme pressure of very heavy
    weight, and the endurance fatigue of very high reps.

    Am I kidding myself? Oh, and before you say it, I'm not trying to avoid
    squatting hard, obviously I'll still be going for each set 100%, but I
    wonder if there's a balance I can strike that will reduce the potential for
    pissing my back off. Thanks.

  2. The Crow said:

    I don't want to over-stress my back, because of an old rowing injury that
    sometimes gives me a little trouble, so I am thinking about reworking my
    squat set/reps count.

    You have to be careful with higher reps and back injuries - just as
    careful as you would be with lower reps but for a different reason. When
    poeple use higher reps, and thus lower weight, they tend not to be so
    careful in slowing down before the reach the bottom, and they do the
    bottom turnaround too fast. This aggrivates lower back and SI joint
    injuries. However, it's hard to do especially when you're huffing and
    puffing during a 15-20 rep set.

    Quoted message said:

    Obviously very low reps are hard because of the high weight, and very high
    reps are hard because of the endurance factor, but do you reckon that if I
    aim for a middle ground, say 12-15 reps, I can reduce the amount of
    immediate stress on my back?

    I'd aim for the 10-12 range, personally. You reduce the weight but
    you're focussed enough throughout the set to not try and speed through
    your reps.

    Quoted message said:


    My thinking is that I will avoid both the extreme pressure of very heavy
    weight, and the endurance fatigue of very high reps.

    Am I kidding myself? Oh, and before you say it, I'm not trying to avoid
    squatting hard, obviously I'll still be going for each set 100%, but I
    wonder if there's a balance I can strike that will reduce the potential for
    pissing my back off. Thanks.

    I used to use only 4-8 reps. My joints, especially my injured ones which
    are numerous, didn't like this. I've started cycling my rep ranges so
    I'm spending far less time in the sub-8 rep area, and on some exercises
    I don't go below 8 reps at all to ease the stress on injured areas.

    Cheers,

    Ari

  3. The Crow said:

    I don't want to over-stress my back, because of an old rowing injury that
    sometimes gives me a little trouble, so I am thinking about reworking my
    squat set/reps count.

    Obviously very low reps are hard because of the high weight, and very high
    reps are hard because of the endurance factor, but do you reckon that if I
    aim for a middle ground, say 12-15 reps, I can reduce the amount of
    immediate stress on my back?

    My thinking is that I will avoid both the extreme pressure of very heavy
    weight, and the endurance fatigue of very high reps.

    Am I kidding myself?

    How about seeing if there's another option that addresses the problem
    and avoids both high reps and very heavy weights?

    http://groups.google.com/group/misc.fitness.weights/msg/b177592e0643229d

  4. "JMW" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    How about seeing if there's another option that addresses the problem
    and avoids both high reps and very heavy weights?

    http://groups.google.com/group/misc.fitness.weights/msg/b177592e0643229d

    Have you tried this?

  5. JMW said:

    How about seeing if there's another option that addresses the problem
    and avoids both high reps and very heavy weights?

    http://groups.google.com/group/misc.fitness.weights/msg/b177592e0643229d

    Will squatting with a plastic bag over the head induce intramuscular
    hypoxia to recruit anaerobic fast-twitch fibers?

  6. DZ said:
    JMW said:

    How about seeing if there's another option that addresses the problem
    and avoids both high reps and very heavy weights?

    http://groups.google.com/group/misc.fitness.weights/msg/b177592e0643229d

    Will squatting with a plastic bag over the head induce intramuscular
    hypoxia to recruit anaerobic fast-twitch fibers?

    I don't know. Perhaps Admiral Hadov will test that hypothesis.

  7. The Crow said:


    "JMW" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    How about seeing if there's another option that addresses the problem
    and avoids both high reps and very heavy weights?

    http://groups.google.com/group/misc.fitness.weights/msg/b177592e0643229d

    Have you tried this?

    Not on an extended basis.

  8. JMW said:
    DZ said:
    JMW said:

    How about seeing if there's another option that addresses the problem
    and avoids both high reps and very heavy weights?

    http://groups.google.com/group/misc.fitness.weights/msg/b177592e0643229d

    Will squatting with a plastic bag over the head induce intramuscular
    hypoxia to recruit anaerobic fast-twitch fibers?

    I don't know. Perhaps Admiral Hadov will test that hypothesis.

    I will of course be pleased to test this theory but will need a
    nerveless adventurer like yourself Trollmeister, with a mouth big
    enough to take a large Seville, to complete my studies.

    Please report to the lab with bag and orange at a date and time to be
    agreed, Don't make any plans for the weekend!

  9. JMW said:
    The Crow said:


    "JMW" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    How about seeing if there's another option that addresses the problem
    and avoids both high reps and very heavy weights?

    http://groups.google.com/group/misc.fitness.weights/msg/b177592e0643229d

    Have you tried this?

    Not on an extended basis.

    <williamsspeak>

    Er... no!

    </williamsspeak>

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.