Hey Mr. Hobbes

Let me ask you whether sexual satisfaction may be difficult to achieve
with or without medical help? Erectile or sexual dysfunction takes
center stage when we talk about sexual problems, ask several different
people what makes for good sex. And there are many different answers
you will get from different people. Buy viagra for ED today from
http://www.canadadrugdepo.com

Let me ask you whether sexual satisfaction may be difficult to achieve
with or without medical help? Erectile or sexual dysfunction takes
center stage when we talk about sexual problems, ask several different
people what makes for good sex. And there are many different answers
you will get from different people. Buy viagra for ED today from
http://www.canadadrugdepo.com

On 18 Mar 2006 00:10:13 -0800, "john77jack" <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

Let me ask you whether sexual satisfaction may be difficult to achieve
with or without medical help? Erectile or sexual dysfunction takes
center stage when we talk about sexual problems, ask several different
people what makes for good sex. And there are many different answers
you will get from different people. Buy viagra for ED today from
http://www.canadadrugdepo.com

You americans make me sick. You are dirty, douchebag, jerkoffs.

John Hanson said:

I got a confirmation that our favorite Texas lady is probably coming
down to Masters Nationals. So, are you game?

This "lady" is not good for your marriage Hanson, and 'Hobbes' is
similarly vulnerable. What is it about that woman that gets you chaps
all weak at the knees?

Given that she has already run rings round Williams and [censored] McD,
and given her advancing years, I'm surprised that you still find her
toothsome enough to pursue! ;o)

Have a great weekend - you know I usually do! ;o)

"JRH" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

John Hanson said:

I got a confirmation that our favorite Texas lady is probably coming
down to Masters Nationals. So, are you game?

This "lady" is not good for your marriage Hanson, and 'Hobbes' is
similarly vulnerable. What is it about that woman that gets you chaps
all weak at the knees?

Given that she has already run rings round Williams and [censored] McD,
and given her advancing years, I'm surprised that you still find her
toothsome enough to pursue! ;o)

Have a great weekend - you know I usually do! ;o)

You are right! She may still have all her teeth but that doesn't make her
toothsome in the least! (I have all my teeth . . . in fact, most of them are
hanging around my neck)

On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 08:26:11 +0000, JRH <[email hidden]> wrote in
misc.fitness.weights:

Quoted message said:

John Hanson said:

I got a confirmation that our favorite Texas lady is probably coming
down to Masters Nationals. So, are you game?

This "lady" is not good for your marriage Hanson, and 'Hobbes' is
similarly vulnerable. What is it about that woman that gets you chaps
all weak at the knees?

Given that she has already run rings round Williams and [censored] McD,
and given her advancing years, I'm surprised that you still find her
toothsome enough to pursue! ;o)

Have a great weekend - you know I usually do! ;o)

Persue? I'm certainly not pursuing her. The fact of the matter is
she is a good [censored] and I find her very likeable and interesting.

John Hanson said:

Persue? I'm certainly not pursuing her. The fact of the matter is
she is a good [censored] and I find her very likeable and interesting.

She is also an awsome dominatrix, and she"tickles my ass with a
feather" real good.

John Hanson

In article <[email hidden]>,

John Hanson said:

I got a confirmation that our favorite Texas lady is probably coming
down to Masters Nationals. So, are you game?

Wish I could John, but not a chance. No holidays left.

--
Keith

In article <[email hidden]>,

John Hanson said:

On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 08:26:11 +0000, JRH <[email hidden]> wrote in
misc.fitness.weights:

Quoted message said:

John Hanson said:

I got a confirmation that our favorite Texas lady is probably coming
down to Masters Nationals. So, are you game?

This "lady" is not good for your marriage Hanson, and 'Hobbes' is
similarly vulnerable. What is it about that woman that gets you chaps
all weak at the knees?

Given that she has already run rings round Williams and [censored] McD,
and given her advancing years, I'm surprised that you still find her
toothsome enough to pursue! ;o)

Have a great weekend - you know I usually do! ;o)

Persue? I'm certainly not pursuing her. The fact of the matter is
she is a good [censored] and I find her very likeable and interesting.

Ditto.

--
Keith

On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 10:43:13 -0600, Hobbes <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

In article <[email hidden]>,

John Hanson said:

On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 08:26:11 +0000, JRH <[email hidden]> wrote in
misc.fitness.weights:

Quoted message said:

On Fri, 17 Mar 2006 21:47:40 -0600, John Hanson
<[email hidden]> wrote:

>I got a confirmation that our favorite Texas lady is probably coming
>down to Masters Nationals. So, are you game?

This "lady" is not good for your marriage Hanson, and 'Hobbes' is
similarly vulnerable. What is it about that woman that gets you chaps
all weak at the knees?

Given that she has already run rings round Williams and [censored] McD,
and given her advancing years, I'm surprised that you still find her
toothsome enough to pursue! ;o)

Have a great weekend - you know I usually do! ;o)

Persue? I'm certainly not pursuing her. The fact of the matter is
she is a good [censored] and I find her very likeable and interesting.

Ditto.

Methinks you both protest too much you horny buggers! ;o)

"JRH" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 10:43:13 -0600, Hobbes <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

In article <[email hidden]>,

John Hanson said:

On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 08:26:11 +0000, JRH <[email hidden]> wrote in
misc.fitness.weights:

>On Fri, 17 Mar 2006 21:47:40 -0600, John Hanson
><[email hidden]> wrote:
>
>>I got a confirmation that our favorite Texas lady is probably coming
>>down to Masters Nationals. So, are you game?
>
>This "lady" is not good for your marriage Hanson, and 'Hobbes' is
>similarly vulnerable. What is it about that woman that gets you chaps
>all weak at the knees?
>
>Given that she has already run rings round Williams and [censored] McD,
>and given her advancing years, I'm surprised that you still find her
>toothsome enough to pursue! ;o)
>
>Have a great weekend - you know I usually do! ;o)

Persue? I'm certainly not pursuing her. The fact of the matter is
she is a good [censored] and I find her very likeable and interesting.

Ditto.

Methinks you both protest too much you horny buggers! ;o)

Shame on you and may you be struck dumb for such an unworthy thought. (I can
see her appeal however. I mean, if you could guide a horse with your
sphincter muscles you would be irresitible as well!)

On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 03:44:43 +1000, "David" <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

"JRH" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 10:43:13 -0600, Hobbes <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

In article <[email hidden]>,
John Hanson <[email hidden]> wrote:

> On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 08:26:11 +0000, JRH <[email hidden]> wrote in
> misc.fitness.weights:
>
> >On Fri, 17 Mar 2006 21:47:40 -0600, John Hanson
> ><[email hidden]> wrote:
> >
> >>I got a confirmation that our favorite Texas lady is probably coming
> >>down to Masters Nationals. So, are you game?
> >
> >This "lady" is not good for your marriage Hanson, and 'Hobbes' is
> >similarly vulnerable. What is it about that woman that gets you chaps
> >all weak at the knees?
> >
> >Given that she has already run rings round Williams and [censored] McD,
> >and given her advancing years, I'm surprised that you still find her
> >toothsome enough to pursue! ;o)
> >
> >Have a great weekend - you know I usually do! ;o)
>
> Persue? I'm certainly not pursuing her. The fact of the matter is
> she is a good [censored] and I find her very likeable and interesting.

Ditto.

Methinks you both protest too much you horny buggers! ;o)

Shame on you and may you be struck dumb for such an unworthy thought. (I can
see her appeal however. I mean, if you could guide a horse with your
sphincter muscles you would be irresitible as well!)

Stop arsing about Oz! ;o)

On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 10:43:13 -0600, Hobbes <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Persue? I'm certainly not pursuing her. The fact of the matter is
she is a good [censored] and I find her very likeable and interesting.

Ditto.

You were both flailing away at your wee men like the world was ending
any minute.

On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 03:44:43 +1000, "David" <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

I mean, if you could guide a horse with your
sphincter muscles you would be irresitible as well

I can guide "it" into a horse's [censored]. Does that count?

"JRH" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 03:44:43 +1000, "David" <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

"JRH" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 10:43:13 -0600, Hobbes <[email hidden]>
wrote:

>In article <[email hidden]>,
> John Hanson <[email hidden]> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 08:26:11 +0000, JRH <[email hidden]> wrote in
>> misc.fitness.weights:
>>
>> >On Fri, 17 Mar 2006 21:47:40 -0600, John Hanson
>> ><[email hidden]> wrote:
>> >
>> >>I got a confirmation that our favorite Texas lady is probably coming
>> >>down to Masters Nationals. So, are you game?
>> >
>> >This "lady" is not good for your marriage Hanson, and 'Hobbes' is
>> >similarly vulnerable. What is it about that woman that gets you chaps
>> >all weak at the knees?
>> >
>> >Given that she has already run rings round Williams and [censored] McD,
>> >and given her advancing years, I'm surprised that you still find her
>> >toothsome enough to pursue! ;o)
>> >
>> >Have a great weekend - you know I usually do! ;o)
>>
>> Persue? I'm certainly not pursuing her. The fact of the matter is
>> she is a good [censored] and I find her very likeable and interesting.
>
>Ditto.

Methinks you both protest too much you horny buggers! ;o)

Shame on you and may you be struck dumb for such an unworthy thought. (I
can
see her appeal however. I mean, if you could guide a horse with your
sphincter muscles you would be irresitible as well!)

Stop arsing about Oz! ;o)

Guilty as charged. (Thank God it's Tuesday)

On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 05:45:09 +1000, "David" <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

"JRH" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 03:44:43 +1000, "David" <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

"JRH" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
> On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 10:43:13 -0600, Hobbes <[email hidden]>
> wrote:
>
>>In article <[email hidden]>,
>> John Hanson <[email hidden]> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 08:26:11 +0000, JRH <[email hidden]> wrote in
>>> misc.fitness.weights:
>>>
>>> >On Fri, 17 Mar 2006 21:47:40 -0600, John Hanson
>>> ><[email hidden]> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >>I got a confirmation that our favorite Texas lady is probably coming
>>> >>down to Masters Nationals. So, are you game?
>>> >
>>> >This "lady" is not good for your marriage Hanson, and 'Hobbes' is
>>> >similarly vulnerable. What is it about that woman that gets you chaps
>>> >all weak at the knees?
>>> >
>>> >Given that she has already run rings round Williams and [censored] McD,
>>> >and given her advancing years, I'm surprised that you still find her
>>> >toothsome enough to pursue! ;o)
>>> >
>>> >Have a great weekend - you know I usually do! ;o)
>>>
>>> Persue? I'm certainly not pursuing her. The fact of the matter is
>>> she is a good [censored] and I find her very likeable and interesting.
>>
>>Ditto.
>
> Methinks you both protest too much you horny buggers! ;o)

Shame on you and may you be struck dumb for such an unworthy thought. (I
can
see her appeal however. I mean, if you could guide a horse with your
sphincter muscles you would be irresitible as well!)

Stop arsing about Oz! ;o)

Guilty as charged. (Thank God it's Tuesday)

It is for you, but I'm alright now! ;o)

On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 17:05:17 +0000, JRH <[email hidden]> wrote in
misc.fitness.weights:

Quoted message said:

On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 10:43:13 -0600, Hobbes <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

In article <[email hidden]>,

John Hanson said:

On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 08:26:11 +0000, JRH <[email hidden]> wrote in
misc.fitness.weights:

>On Fri, 17 Mar 2006 21:47:40 -0600, John Hanson
><[email hidden]> wrote:
>
>>I got a confirmation that our favorite Texas lady is probably coming
>>down to Masters Nationals. So, are you game?
>
>This "lady" is not good for your marriage Hanson, and 'Hobbes' is
>similarly vulnerable. What is it about that woman that gets you chaps
>all weak at the knees?
>
>Given that she has already run rings round Williams and [censored] McD,
>and given her advancing years, I'm surprised that you still find her
>toothsome enough to pursue! ;o)
>
>Have a great weekend - you know I usually do! ;o)

Persue? I'm certainly not pursuing her. The fact of the matter is
she is a good [censored] and I find her very likeable and interesting.

Ditto.

Methinks you both protest too much you horny buggers! ;o)

I live in the babe capital of the US. I don't need to go to Texas to
chase chicks.

John Hanson said:

I live in the babe capital of the US. I don't need to go to Texas to
chase chicks.

No, he goes to the gay bars to chase chics.

John Hanson said:

On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 17:05:17 +0000, JRH <[email hidden]> wrote in
misc.fitness.weights:

Quoted message said:

On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 10:43:13 -0600, Hobbes <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

In article <[email hidden]>,
John Hanson <[email hidden]> wrote:

> On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 08:26:11 +0000, JRH <[email hidden]> wrote in
> misc.fitness.weights:
>
> >On Fri, 17 Mar 2006 21:47:40 -0600, John Hanson
> ><[email hidden]> wrote:
> >
> >>I got a confirmation that our favorite Texas lady is probably coming
> >>down to Masters Nationals. So, are you game?
> >
> >This "lady" is not good for your marriage Hanson, and 'Hobbes' is
> >similarly vulnerable. What is it about that woman that gets you chaps
> >all weak at the knees?
> >
> >Given that she has already run rings round Williams and [censored] McD,
> >and given her advancing years, I'm surprised that you still find her
> >toothsome enough to pursue! ;o)
> >
> >Have a great weekend - you know I usually do! ;o)
>
> Persue? I'm certainly not pursuing her. The fact of the matter is
> she is a good [censored] and I find her very likeable and interesting.

Ditto.

Methinks you both protest too much you horny buggers! ;o)

I live in the babe capital of the US. I don't need to go to Texas to
chase chicks.

Good for you JH, you ought to get Hodges to visit as he needs to get
his leg over too! ;o)