On Sat, 3 Mar 2007 17:41:14 +0100, "Robert Chung" <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:
Bret said:
On Mar 2, 4:47 pm, John Forrest Tomlinson <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:
On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 18:38:39 -0500, John Forrest Tomlinson
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
> Max Van Heeswijk
Or Juan Antonio Flecha.
Almost called it.
Yeah, that would've made the candyassing even worse.
Yeah, I meant to say it'd be Flecha, or else he'd be top five, or maybe not if several other guys were ahead of him or he didn't finish. Pretty much called it I did. -- JT **************************** Remove "remove" to reply Visit http://www.jt10000.com ****************************
On Mar 3, 12:15 pm, John Forrest Tomlinson <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:
On Sat, 3 Mar 2007 17:41:14 +0100, "Robert Chung" <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:
Bret said:
On Mar 2, 4:47 pm, John Forrest Tomlinson <[email hidden]> wrote: > On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 18:38:39 -0500, John Forrest Tomlinson
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
>> Max Van Heeswijk
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
> Or Juan Antonio Flecha.
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Almost called it.
Quoted message said:
Yeah, that would've made the candyassing even worse.
Yeah, I meant to say it'd be Flecha, or else he'd be top five, or maybe not if several other guys were ahead of him or he didn't finish. Pretty much called it I did.
On Sat, 3 Mar 2007 17:41:14 +0100, "Robert Chung" <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:
Bret said:
On Mar 2, 4:47 pm, John Forrest Tomlinson <[email hidden]> wrote: > On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 18:38:39 -0500, John Forrest Tomlinson >> Max Van Heeswijk > Or Juan Antonio Flecha. Almost called it.
Yeah, that would've made the candyassing even worse.
Yeah, I meant to say it'd be Flecha, or else he'd be top five, or maybe not if several other guys were ahead of him or he didn't finish. Pretty much called it I did.
Wow, retroactive candyassing, a whole new skill.
Eeckhout could've been in there if things had gone a little differently.
On Sat, 3 Mar 2007 17:41:14 +0100, "Robert Chung" <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:
Bret wrote: > On Mar 2, 4:47 pm, John Forrest Tomlinson <[email hidden]> > wrote: >> On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 18:38:39 -0500, John Forrest Tomlinson >>> Max Van Heeswijk >> Or Juan Antonio Flecha. > Almost called it. Yeah, that would've made the candyassing even worse.
Yeah, I meant to say it'd be Flecha, or else he'd be top five, or maybe not if several other guys were ahead of him or he didn't finish. Pretty much called it I did.
Wow, retroactive candyassing, a whole new skill.
Eeckhout could've been in there if things had gone a little differently.
Since Pozzato (allegedly) didn't sign on, is he the real winner? JT may be vindicated.
Pozzato did that very well. I saw him win Haut Var last weekend and he didn't really seem to need much pop that time.
O'Grady looks like he might be a contender in some of the classics; perhaps the old Riis magic is working again. I wonder if he's doing Milan-San Remo ?
"Donald Munro" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Robert Chung said:
Pozzato did that very well. I saw him win Haut Var last weekend and he didn't really seem to need much pop that time.
O'Grady looks like he might be a contender in some of the classics; perhaps the old Riis magic is working again. I wonder if he's doing Milan-San Remo ?
That was what I thought when I saw O'Grady running so strongly at the front. I hope he doesn't lose hope since he has always seemed to be almost there only to lose it in the last little bit.
