Help wanted with chakra & tuning forks please

Hello,

Thank for the invaluable information, but the core question (should I
buy CHAKRA tuning forks instead of the basic tuning forks that I have)
seems still opnen.

I got the frequencies of the website:
http://www.planetware.de/tone/cosmic.html (and then click on your left
side table of chakra's)

So please, help me out on this.

Best wishes,

Stefan
------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
Rich Andrews <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

[email hidden] (Stefan V.) wrote in
news:[email hidden]:

Quoted message said:

Hello,

I am starting to learn everything concerning the CHAKRA.
During my investigation, I found this list:
1st CHAKRA: G (194,48 Hz)
2nd CHAKRA: G# 210,42 Hz)
3rd CHAKRA: B (126,22 Hz)
4th CHAKRA: C# (136,10 Hz) (Same frequency as the OM)
5th CHAKRA: C# (141,27 Hz)
6th CHAKRA: A (221,23 Hz)
7th CHAKRA: F (172,06 Hz)

Now, I have the following problem: I have a complete set of 'normal'
tuning forks (C, C#, D, ...) but not the CHAKRA tuning forks that
exist.

I would like to know if it is true that the 4th & the 5th chakra use
the same tuning forks (c#). However, I see that there is a slight
difference in Hz between the 4th and the 5th chakra.

Core question: Is it really necessary to purchase a chakra tuning
forks set, or can I use the c# tuning fork for both the 4th and the
5th chakra.

Any help is really appreciated,

Best wishes,

Stefan

A file applied to your tuning fork set will raise their frequency.

r

[email hidden] (Stefan V.) wrote in
news:[email hidden]:

Quoted message said:

Hello,

Thank for the invaluable information, but the core question (should I
buy CHAKRA tuning forks instead of the basic tuning forks that I have)
seems still opnen.

I got the frequencies of the website:
http://www.planetware.de/tone/cosmic.html (and then click on your left
side table of chakra's)

So please, help me out on this.

Best wishes,

Stefan

If you are looking for a health benefit, then the regular tuning forks are
fine.

If you want to tune a musical instrument to a standard, then one could use a
auto-chromatic tuner like the Seiko ST-1100 no matter what the temperment or
scale.

r

Quoted message said:

------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
Rich Andrews <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

[email hidden] (Stefan V.) wrote in
news:[email hidden]:

Quoted message said:

Hello,

I am starting to learn everything concerning the CHAKRA.
During my investigation, I found this list:
1st CHAKRA: G (194,48 Hz)
2nd CHAKRA: G# 210,42 Hz)
3rd CHAKRA: B (126,22 Hz)
4th CHAKRA: C# (136,10 Hz) (Same frequency as the OM)
5th CHAKRA: C# (141,27 Hz)
6th CHAKRA: A (221,23 Hz)
7th CHAKRA: F (172,06 Hz)

Now, I have the following problem: I have a complete set of 'normal'
tuning forks (C, C#, D, ...) but not the CHAKRA tuning forks that
exist.

I would like to know if it is true that the 4th & the 5th chakra use
the same tuning forks (c#). However, I see that there is a slight
difference in Hz between the 4th and the 5th chakra.

Core question: Is it really necessary to purchase a chakra tuning
forks set, or can I use the c# tuning fork for both the 4th and the
5th chakra.

Any help is really appreciated,

Best wishes,

Stefan

A file applied to your tuning fork set will raise their frequency.

r

--
"I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, de-briefed, or
numbered...My life is my own."

"I am not a number. I am a free man."
No. 6

Dear Stefan

there must something wrong with this frequenzes. Cause A ist 440 Hz. Puting
down A one oktave is 220 Hz not 221,23 Hz. Although nobody can hear the
difference between 136,10 Hz and 141,27 Hz or even 126,22 Hz. If you tune
any instrument, you won´t hear the difference. Even such guys als Rubinstein
did´nt know that. He always wanted that his piano was tuned on 380 Hz
instead of 440 Hz. His Tuner couldn´t convince him, that this was imposibel
even for a tuning maschine.

So I looked at the page you´ve named, and I couldn´t find any sense in that,
nor on music side nor on spiritual meanings. I´m not a master or even a good
scholar in yoga by myself, only one who practice for al long time, if ten
years are a long time. There are tunes witch correspondent with chakras, but
maybe it is a good fortune to try it by yourselve witch chakra answer on
witch tune. Please forgive me for my bad englisch, cause i´m not in juse of
writting it for al long time.

my best wishes

Wilhelm

"Stefan V." <[email hidden]> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Hello,

I am starting to learn everything concerning the CHAKRA.
During my investigation, I found this list:
1st CHAKRA: G (194,48 Hz)
2nd CHAKRA: G# 210,42 Hz)
3rd CHAKRA: B (126,22 Hz)
4th CHAKRA: C# (136,10 Hz) (Same frequency as the OM)
5th CHAKRA: C# (141,27 Hz)
6th CHAKRA: A (221,23 Hz)
7th CHAKRA: F (172,06 Hz)

Now, I have the following problem: I have a complete set of 'normal'
tuning forks (C, C#, D, ...) but not the CHAKRA tuning forks that
exist.

I would like to know if it is true that the 4th & the 5th chakra use
the same tuning forks (c#). However, I see that there is a slight
difference in Hz between the 4th and the 5th chakra.

Core question: Is it really necessary to purchase a chakra tuning
forks set, or can I use the c# tuning fork for both the 4th and the
5th chakra.

Any help is really appreciated,

Best wishes,

Stefan

What part of the world uses comas for decimal points?
Got to be German.

Mike Dubbeld

"Wilhelm Kuehs" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Dear Stefan

there must something wrong with this frequenzes. Cause A ist 440 Hz.

Puting

Quoted message said:

down A one oktave is 220 Hz not 221,23 Hz. Although nobody can hear

the

Quoted message said:

difference between 136,10 Hz and 141,27 Hz or even 126,22 Hz. If you

tune

Quoted message said:

any instrument, you won´t hear the difference. Even such guys als

Rubinstein

Quoted message said:

did´nt know that. He always wanted that his piano was tuned on 380 Hz
instead of 440 Hz. His Tuner couldn´t convince him, that this was

imposibel

Quoted message said:

even for a tuning maschine.

So I looked at the page you´ve named, and I couldn´t find any sense in

that,

Quoted message said:

nor on music side nor on spiritual meanings. I´m not a master or even

a good

Quoted message said:

scholar in yoga by myself, only one who practice for al long time, if

ten

Quoted message said:

years are a long time. There are tunes witch correspondent with

chakras, but

Quoted message said:

maybe it is a good fortune to try it by yourselve witch chakra answer

on

Quoted message said:

witch tune. Please forgive me for my bad englisch, cause i´m not in

juse of

Quoted message said:

writting it for al long time.

my best wishes

Wilhelm

"Stefan V." <[email hidden]> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Hello,

I am starting to learn everything concerning the CHAKRA.
During my investigation, I found this list:
1st CHAKRA: G (194,48 Hz)
2nd CHAKRA: G# 210,42 Hz)
3rd CHAKRA: B (126,22 Hz)
4th CHAKRA: C# (136,10 Hz) (Same frequency as the OM)
5th CHAKRA: C# (141,27 Hz)
6th CHAKRA: A (221,23 Hz)
7th CHAKRA: F (172,06 Hz)

Now, I have the following problem: I have a complete set of 'normal'
tuning forks (C, C#, D, ...) but not the CHAKRA tuning forks that
exist.

I would like to know if it is true that the 4th & the 5th chakra use
the same tuning forks (c#). However, I see that there is a slight
difference in Hz between the 4th and the 5th chakra.

Core question: Is it really necessary to purchase a chakra tuning
forks set, or can I use the c# tuning fork for both the 4th and the
5th chakra.

Any help is really appreciated,

Best wishes,

Stefan

"Mike Dubbeld" <[email hidden]> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

What part of the world uses comas for decimal points?
Got to be German.

Mike Dubbeld

Yes it is german

Wilhelm Kuehs

Quoted message said:

"Wilhelm Kuehs" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Dear Stefan

there must something wrong with this frequenzes. Cause A ist 440 Hz.

Puting

Quoted message said:

down A one oktave is 220 Hz not 221,23 Hz. Although nobody can hear

the

Quoted message said:

difference between 136,10 Hz and 141,27 Hz or even 126,22 Hz. If you

tune

Quoted message said:

any instrument, you won´t hear the difference. Even such guys als

Rubinstein

Quoted message said:

did´nt know that. He always wanted that his piano was tuned on 380 Hz
instead of 440 Hz. His Tuner couldn´t convince him, that this was

imposibel

Quoted message said:

even for a tuning maschine.

So I looked at the page you´ve named, and I couldn´t find any sense in

that,

Quoted message said:

nor on music side nor on spiritual meanings. I´m not a master or even

a good

Quoted message said:

scholar in yoga by myself, only one who practice for al long time, if

ten

Quoted message said:

years are a long time. There are tunes witch correspondent with

chakras, but

Quoted message said:

maybe it is a good fortune to try it by yourselve witch chakra answer

on

Quoted message said:

witch tune. Please forgive me for my bad englisch, cause i´m not in

juse of

Quoted message said:

writting it for al long time.

my best wishes

Wilhelm

"Stefan V." <[email hidden]> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Hello,

I am starting to learn everything concerning the CHAKRA.
During my investigation, I found this list:
1st CHAKRA: G (194,48 Hz)
2nd CHAKRA: G# 210,42 Hz)
3rd CHAKRA: B (126,22 Hz)
4th CHAKRA: C# (136,10 Hz) (Same frequency as the OM)
5th CHAKRA: C# (141,27 Hz)
6th CHAKRA: A (221,23 Hz)
7th CHAKRA: F (172,06 Hz)

Now, I have the following problem: I have a complete set of 'normal'
tuning forks (C, C#, D, ...) but not the CHAKRA tuning forks that
exist.

I would like to know if it is true that the 4th & the 5th chakra use
the same tuning forks (c#). However, I see that there is a slight
difference in Hz between the 4th and the 5th chakra.

Core question: Is it really necessary to purchase a chakra tuning
forks set, or can I use the c# tuning fork for both the 4th and the
5th chakra.

Any help is really appreciated,

Best wishes,

Stefan

Well, we swedes ;-) do use commas!

Christina

Mike Dubbeld <[email hidden]> skrev i
diskussionsgruppsmeddelandet:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

What part of the world uses comas for decimal points?
Got to be German.

Mike Dubbeld

"Wilhelm Kuehs" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Dear Stefan

there must something wrong with this frequenzes. Cause A ist 440 Hz.

Puting

Quoted message said:

down A one oktave is 220 Hz not 221,23 Hz. Although nobody can hear

the

Quoted message said:

difference between 136,10 Hz and 141,27 Hz or even 126,22 Hz. If you

tune

Quoted message said:

any instrument, you won´t hear the difference. Even such guys als

Rubinstein

Quoted message said:

did´nt know that. He always wanted that his piano was tuned on 380 Hz
instead of 440 Hz. His Tuner couldn´t convince him, that this was

imposibel

Quoted message said:

even for a tuning maschine.

So I looked at the page you´ve named, and I couldn´t find any sense in

that,

Quoted message said:

nor on music side nor on spiritual meanings. I´m not a master or even

a good

Quoted message said:

scholar in yoga by myself, only one who practice for al long time, if

ten

Quoted message said:

years are a long time. There are tunes witch correspondent with

chakras, but

Quoted message said:

maybe it is a good fortune to try it by yourselve witch chakra answer

on

Quoted message said:

witch tune. Please forgive me for my bad englisch, cause i´m not in

juse of

Quoted message said:

writting it for al long time.

my best wishes

Wilhelm

"Stefan V." <[email hidden]> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Hello,

I am starting to learn everything concerning the CHAKRA.
During my investigation, I found this list:
1st CHAKRA: G (194,48 Hz)
2nd CHAKRA: G# 210,42 Hz)
3rd CHAKRA: B (126,22 Hz)
4th CHAKRA: C# (136,10 Hz) (Same frequency as the OM)
5th CHAKRA: C# (141,27 Hz)
6th CHAKRA: A (221,23 Hz)
7th CHAKRA: F (172,06 Hz)

Now, I have the following problem: I have a complete set of 'normal'
tuning forks (C, C#, D, ...) but not the CHAKRA tuning forks that
exist.

I would like to know if it is true that the 4th & the 5th chakra use
the same tuning forks (c#). However, I see that there is a slight
difference in Hz between the 4th and the 5th chakra.

Core question: Is it really necessary to purchase a chakra tuning
forks set, or can I use the c# tuning fork for both the 4th and the
5th chakra.

Any help is really appreciated,

Best wishes,

Stefan

"TinaChristina" <[email hidden]> wrote in
news:[email hidden]:

Quoted message said:

Well, we swedes ;-) do use commas!

Christina

And I see you use them when appropriate. No gratutiously or without regard
to the rules of punctuation.

r

Quoted message said:

Mike Dubbeld <[email hidden]> skrev i
diskussionsgruppsmeddelandet:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

What part of the world uses comas for decimal points?
Got to be German.

Mike Dubbeld

"Wilhelm Kuehs" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Dear Stefan

there must something wrong with this frequenzes. Cause A ist 440 Hz.

Puting

Quoted message said:

down A one oktave is 220 Hz not 221,23 Hz. Although nobody can hear

the

Quoted message said:

difference between 136,10 Hz and 141,27 Hz or even 126,22 Hz. If you

tune

Quoted message said:

any instrument, you won´t hear the difference. Even such guys als

Rubinstein

Quoted message said:

did´nt know that. He always wanted that his piano was tuned on 380 Hz
instead of 440 Hz. His Tuner couldn´t convince him, that this was

imposibel

Quoted message said:

even for a tuning maschine.

So I looked at the page you´ve named, and I couldn´t find any sense in

that,

Quoted message said:

nor on music side nor on spiritual meanings. I´m not a master or even

a good

Quoted message said:

scholar in yoga by myself, only one who practice for al long time, if

ten

Quoted message said:

years are a long time. There are tunes witch correspondent with

chakras, but

Quoted message said:

maybe it is a good fortune to try it by yourselve witch chakra answer

on

Quoted message said:

witch tune. Please forgive me for my bad englisch, cause i´m not in

juse of

Quoted message said:

writting it for al long time.

my best wishes

Wilhelm

"Stefan V." <[email hidden]> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:[email hidden]...
> Hello,
>
> I am starting to learn everything concerning the CHAKRA.
> During my investigation, I found this list:
> 1st CHAKRA: G (194,48 Hz)
> 2nd CHAKRA: G# 210,42 Hz)
> 3rd CHAKRA: B (126,22 Hz)
> 4th CHAKRA: C# (136,10 Hz) (Same frequency as the OM)
> 5th CHAKRA: C# (141,27 Hz)
> 6th CHAKRA: A (221,23 Hz)
> 7th CHAKRA: F (172,06 Hz)
>
> Now, I have the following problem: I have a complete set of 'normal'
> tuning forks (C, C#, D, ...) but not the CHAKRA tuning forks that
> exist.
>
> I would like to know if it is true that the 4th & the 5th chakra use
> the same tuning forks (c#). However, I see that there is a slight
> difference in Hz between the 4th and the 5th chakra.
>
> Core question: Is it really necessary to purchase a chakra tuning
> forks set, or can I use the c# tuning fork for both the 4th and the
> 5th chakra.
>
> Any help is really appreciated,
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Stefan

--
"I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, de-briefed, or
numbered...My life is my own."

"I am not a number. I am a free man."
No. 6

Mike Dubbeld said:

What part of the world uses comas for decimal points?
Got to be German.

Most of Europe, I think...

sue

Rich Andrews said:

"TinaChristina" <[email hidden]> wrote in
news:[email hidden]:

Quoted message said:

Well, we swedes ;-) do use commas!

Christina

And I see you use them when appropriate. No gratutiously or without regard
to the rules of punctuation.

Rules of punctuation according to whom? Get over being Anglo-centric....

sue

"Mike Dubbeld" <[email hidden]> schreef in bericht
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

What part of the world uses comas for decimal points?
Got to be German.

Mike Dubbeld

Most of continental Europe does.

--

Robert Bronsing

But that's okay, see the children bleed
It'll look great on the TV

"Mike Dubbeld" <[email hidden]> schreef in bericht
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"Robert Bronsing" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"Mike Dubbeld" <[email hidden]> schreef in bericht
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

What part of the world uses comas for decimal points?
Got to be German.

Mike Dubbeld

Most of continental Europe does.

A trillion is 1,000,000,000,000 the commas help identifiying
what the number is. Would it be 1000000000000 in German?

No. It would be 1.000.000.000.000 or, simply 1.10^9

--

Robert Bronsing

But that's okay, see the children bleed
It'll look great on the TV

suzee <[email hidden]> wrote in news:[email hidden]:

Quoted message said:

Rich Andrews said:

"TinaChristina" <[email hidden]> wrote in
news:[email hidden]:

Quoted message said:

Well, we swedes ;-) do use commas!

Christina

And I see you use them when appropriate. No gratutiously or without
regard to the rules of punctuation.

Rules of punctuation according to whom? Get over being Anglo-centric....

sue

Get over being Anglo centric? What are you talking about? I was pointing
out that you were using punctuation correctly unlike some here that replace
periods with commas because "it adds style" or some other redneck-hillbilly
excuse for poor education.

r

--
"I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, de-briefed, or
numbered...My life is my own."

"I am not a number. I am a free man."
No. 6

Rich Andrews said:

suzee <[email hidden]> wrote in news:[email hidden]:

Quoted message said:

Rich Andrews said:

"TinaChristina" <[email hidden]> wrote in
news:[email hidden]:

> Well, we swedes ;-) do use commas!
>
> Christina
>
>

And I see you use them when appropriate. No gratutiously or without
regard to the rules of punctuation.

Rules of punctuation according to whom? Get over being Anglo-centric....

sue

Get over being Anglo centric? What are you talking about? I was pointing
out that you were using punctuation correctly unlike some here that replace
periods with commas because "it adds style" or some other redneck-hillbilly
excuse for poor education.

And *I* meant that your `judging' the use of commas instead of periods
as `style or poor education', shows that you're in need of some
education. Most European countries *properly* use them that way.

sue

"Mike Dubbeld" <[email hidden]> schreef in bericht
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"suzee" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Rich Andrews said:

suzee <[email hidden]> wrote in

news:[email hidden]:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> Rich Andrews wrote:
>>
>> "TinaChristina" <[email hidden]> wrote in
>> news:[email hidden]:
>>
>> > Well, we swedes ;-) do use commas!
>> >
>> > Christina
>> >
>> >
>>
>> And I see you use them when appropriate. No gratutiously or

without

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

>> regard to the rules of punctuation.
>
> Rules of punctuation according to whom? Get over being

Anglo-centric....

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

>
> sue
>

Get over being Anglo centric? What are you talking about? I was

pointing

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

out that you were using punctuation correctly unlike some here that

replace

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

periods with commas because "it adds style" or some other

redneck-hillbilly

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

excuse for poor education.

And *I* meant that your `judging' the use of commas instead of periods
as `style or poor education', shows that you're in need of some
education. Most European countries *properly* use them that way.

sue

You mean most non-anglo non-scientists and non-technical people. Theres
a lot of 'pet' german dialects also.

"pet" German "dialects"? What do you mean by that? And, eh, rules of using
comma's and other punctuation is actually very different from language to
language. Don't expect the whole world to have a firm grasp of English
grammar. And, use your own punctuation correctly, if you want to [censored] about
non-native writers not always using correct English grammar. "There's" as in
"There is", not Theres (not a word). And, since you're reffering to a
plural, use "there are".

--

Robert Bronsing

But that's okay, see the children bleed
It'll look great on the TV

"Robert Bronsing" <[email hidden]> schreef in bericht
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"Mike Dubbeld" <[email hidden]> schreef in bericht
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"Robert Bronsing" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"Mike Dubbeld" <[email hidden]> schreef in bericht
news:[email hidden]...
> What part of the world uses comas for decimal points?
> Got to be German.
>
> Mike Dubbeld

Most of continental Europe does.

A trillion is 1,000,000,000,000 the commas help identifiying
what the number is. Would it be 1000000000000 in German?

No. It would be 1.000.000.000.000 or, simply 1.10^9

Correction: 1.10^12....

--

Robert Bronsing

But that's okay, see the children bleed
It'll look great on the TV

Quoted message said:

Rich Andrews said:

suzee <[email hidden]> wrote in news:[email hidden]:

Quoted message said:

Rich Andrews wrote:
>
> "TinaChristina" <[email hidden]> wrote in
> news:[email hidden]:
>
> > Well, we swedes ;-) do use commas!
> >
> > Christina
> >
> >
>
> And I see you use them when appropriate. No gratutiously or without
> regard to the rules of punctuation.

Rules of punctuation according to whom? Get over being Anglo-centric....

sue

Get over being Anglo centric? What are you talking about? I was pointing
out that you were using punctuation correctly unlike some here that replace
periods with commas because "it adds style" or some other redneck-hillbilly
excuse for poor education.

And *I* meant that your `judging' the use of commas instead of periods
as `style or poor education', shows that you're in need of some
education. Most European countries *properly* use them that way.

sue

Sue, this is the Internet, darling. We use American English here. Make a note
of it.

Robert Bronsing said:

"Mike Dubbeld" <[email hidden]> schreef in bericht

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

A trillion is 1,000,000,000,000 the commas help identifiying what
the number is. Would it be 1000000000000 in German?

Quoted message said:

No. It would be 1.000.000.000.000 or, simply 1.10^9

Yeah, a month old x-posted thread to which to reply!

They use commas instead of decimal points in SA too, presumably due to
them having much Dutch ancestry and despite them once being a member of
our blesséd Commonwealth.

Ostensibly to prevent this confusion, over in this part of the world --
poorly taught and followed, even to those who claim themselves educated
-- convention says any number over one thousand is supposed to be
grouped neither by . nor by , but by .

Dale