steve common said:Donovan Rebbechi said:By the time you're up to 5x/week, you could make one of
those 5 a full blown speed workout. Note that your program
requires similar training time to about 40 minutes at
5x/week.
Exactly my point. Same training time, less runs - ie
minimal impact on current organisation - yet more
effective (perhaps?)
Also more stressful. I mean, I could try running a 70 mile
ultra each week, with a few fast legs too, and that would
have "minimal impact on current organisation - yet more
effective (perhaps?)".
I don't advocate distributing a high training load over as
few workouts as possible. If you have less workout slots
available, you need to reduce training load. I would need
to go down to 50-60mpw if I had to get rid of 2-a-days,
for example.
Quoted message said:Isn't it likely that the "two quality session per week"
Well, 3 if you count the long run. No easy sessions in
there.
Quoted message said:approach would provide much quicker returns?
Quicker injuries too. And I doubt the performance
improvements would be that much quicker. He's running
just under 30 minutes for 5k. Do you think some steady
paced running would allow him to substantially improve on
that time, or is he that close to his genetic limitations
that he *needs* to do speed work twice a week ? Why the
hurry anyway ?
Also consider the motivation for the guy wanting to cram
this in was so he could participate in other sports. Do you
think he's going to rest on those other days ? No, he's
going to do weight training, martial arts, and cycling.
Where are the easy/recovery days in this scheme ? What do
you think is going to happen if he uses the same approach do
it as "hard as possible to save time" approach ?
Cheers,
--
Donovan Rebbechi pegasus.rutgers.edu~elflordOpen ↗