Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Help Me Choose A Headlight

Started by Prisoner at War · · Last activity · 87 posts · 1,689 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
2 May 2007
Last activity
7 May 2007
Original author
Prisoner at War
Posts
87
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,689
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 81–87 of 87
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Prisoner at War said:
    Quoted message said:

    If you do go with some mega-bright, no-optics solution, please be
    courteous with it.

    Quoted message said:

    Some of us have encountered cyclists with those systems approaching us
    on bike trails, and have experienced being blinded. Some users have
    bragged about car drivers flashing their brights, because of the glare
    from those systems.


    ...

    Yes, that's a very important point you make. While I was certainly
    relishing giving them motorists a bit of their own medicine with an
    HID light, I also don't want my fellow cyclists to be blinded! I'm
    not sure how they could be, though, seeing how they'd be at the same
    eye-level as me...

    It absolutely can and will happen. I've been on the receiving end, on
    a short cut-through bike trail in our town. I remember desperately
    trying to shield my eyes and close one eye to retain a _little_ night
    vision. It was ugly.

    Quoted message said:

    Not sure how I'd prevent their being blinded, anyway: I couldn't
    predict it, could I? But I'm sure the two HIDs I'm considering have
    some kind of optics which should mitigate such circumstances. They
    better, anyway, for $600!!!

    Wrong. They won't. Or more precisely, I'll be amazed if the beams
    are anything other than circular - that is, sending exactly as much
    light up as down. For some reason, manufacturers of $600 HID lights
    (or $200 MR-16 lights) can't replicate the optics of a $20 Cateye
    light from 1990.

    The only way to NOT blind an oncoming cyclist with a no-optics high
    power light, is to point the light down in front of you. But then
    you'll find you've got a super-bright patch of road close in front of
    you, it's reflecting back and ruining your night vision, and you can't
    see very well at all. This is why I don't like the crude-optics mega-
    lights.

    Before you shell out the cost of a bicycle on an excessively bright
    light, try this: Borrow an ordinary, good quality bike headlight.
    Try a Cateye Halogen Micro-II, for example, if you can find one (the
    pre-LED model) or any decent generator light. Put it on your bike,
    have a friend ride your bike toward you, and see how conspicuous 2.4
    watts of halogen light really is.

    I've done this with dozens of other cyclists, in night lighting
    workshops. I've never had any of them say "That's too dim to be
    safe."

    If you want to up the lumen output, that, fine. But be responsible,
    and don't think you've got to look like a supernova to be noticed.

    Quoted message said:

    So which one do you recommend?

    I recommend a generator light. If you don't like to generate your own
    power, I recommend a generator lamp powered by your own rechargeable
    battery pack. If you want twice as much light, either put in a more
    powerful bulb into the lamp assembly, or mount two of them.

    - Frank Krygowski

  2. Gary Young said:
    Steve Gravrock said:

    On 2007-05-02, Tim McNamara <[email hidden]> wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    The light source needs to be
    low- fork crown height or lower- to maximize its usefulness. Most
    battery powered lights are designed to mount above the handlebar or-
    even much worse- on your head.

    Quoted message said:

    It seems like there could be a market for something that allows
    handlebar-mount lights to be mounted low on the bike. Does anyone make
    anything like that?

    Minoura makes a clamp for that purpose:

    and you can find them here @ tinyurl.com/3yccs4

  3. Prisoner at War said:

    Anyway, a good reminder, your post. I almost never feel the need for
    a light, but all club rides require them (except the anarchist Time's
    Up! rides -- hooray!), and, in keeping with my nature, if I get
    something I'd like to get the best. ^_^

    I'm glad to see more night rides by clubs. Some clubs are very explicit
    as to the brightness of lights that are required, but any available HID
    light should be sufficient, usually the minimum is a 6 watt
    quartz-halogen headlight and some sort of an LED or xenon tail light.

    With the HID and MR series of lights, you don't really have to worry
    about blinding other cyclists, as the optics on these are very precise.
    On some of the sealed beams the light is more of a flood pattern, and I
    wouldn't use the 25 watt version in traffic as it could be annoying.

  4. SMS said:
    Prisoner at War said:

    Anyway, a good reminder, your post. I almost never feel the need for
    a light, but all club rides require them (except the anarchist Time's
    Up! rides -- hooray!), and, in keeping with my nature, if I get
    something I'd like to get the best. ^_^

    I'm glad to see more night rides by clubs. Some clubs are very explicit
    as to the brightness of lights that are required,

    Oh? How do they measure brightness?

    Quoted message said:

    but any available HID
    light should be sufficient, usually the minimum is a 6 watt
    quartz-halogen headlight...

    "Usually"? I'd like to see some citation for that.

    Quoted message said:

    With the HID and MR series of lights, you don't really have to worry
    about blinding other cyclists, as the optics on these are very precise.

    Quoted message said:

    From what I've seen, the optics on HID and MR lights are very precise


    only in that they don't throw light out the back! They do throw a fog
    of light out the front, _roughly_ in an eight degree (fairly typical
    spot) or 30+ degree (fairly typical flood) radially symmetrical
    pattern. IOW they throw as much light up as down.

    Compare this with the optics on, say, my car headlamps, my motorcycle
    headlamps, or my bicycle generator headlamps. All these direct less
    light upward, since more light is needed downward onto the road. The
    cutoff plane is easily apparent. They use the light output
    efficiently.

    Remember, light going upward toward other road users travels directly
    from your lamp to their eye. It doesn't need to be as powerful as
    what goes down. The downward light must hit the road, where some gets
    absorbed and some gets scattered. Only a small percentage bounces
    back to your eye to show you the road.

    You need bright light down, much less light up. Radially symmetrical
    optics don't do that.

    - Frank Krygowski

  5. Prisoner at War said:

    Not sure how I'd prevent their being blinded, anyway: I couldn't
    predict it, could I? But I'm sure the two HIDs I'm considering have
    some kind of optics which should mitigate such circumstances. They
    better, anyway, for $600!!!

    In reality, the optics on the higher end bicycle lights are excellent.
    It's not a wild unfocused beam such as on the old 2 D cell battery
    headlights of the olden days. The quartz-halogen lights are typically
    using MR lamps, which are very good optics with matched, mirrored
    reflectors.

    Most bicycle and motorcycle HID lamps also use MR11 and MR16 type lamps,
    as it's become the super-standard for high-end lighting.

    One of the big advantages of the MR system is that the bulb is aligned
    precisely with the reflector at the factory. One problem with the lamps
    where you replace the actual bulb is that you have to align the bulb by
    trial and error (not even possible on the cheap lamps with threaded
    bulbs, and a hassle on the higher end lamps with a bulb that can be
    rotated for proper alignment).

    Look at HID lamps on vehicles. If aimed properly, the low beams don't
    blind you. Contrast this with some of the crappy daytime running light
    implementations that use the high beams at half-brightness, and blind
    you even though the lights are not really all that bright.

    Quoted message said:

    So which one do you recommend? Looks like the NiteRider is a winner.
    Funny how I can't really find reviews of these guys online. I've seen
    only one "real" (i.e., useful, with a good photo) review of the Light
    & Motion product, but none yet for the NiteRider (which is newer,
    though).

    Anyway, a good reminder, your post. I almost never feel the need for
    a light, but all club rides require them (except the anarchist Time's
    Up! rides -- hooray!), and, in keeping with my nature, if I get
    something I'd like to get the best. ^_^

    (Yes yes I know "the best" is a semantically ambiguous term....)
    (Yes yes, I know, "

    You really have to look at them to evaluate them. Do any have a metal
    mounting bracket to the bike? How rugged is the wiring and the switches?
    How much will battery replacement cost? How much is a replacement
    lamp? Most of these systems use the MR11 Welch Allyn HID lamp, which
    costs close to $90, and you definitely want to have a spare. There will
    soon be a flood (no pun intended) of lower-cost replacement HID lamps
    coming in from Asia, you can already see them on the manufacturer's web
    sites.

  6. Richard B. said:
    SMS said:
    Prisoner at War said:

    I'm wondering whether to get the Light & Motion ARC Li-Ion Ultra HID or
    the NiteRider Moab HID/LED.

    --Snip--

    Quoted message said:

    Again, this site is primarily to help people construct their own
    high-performance lighting systems. It's been expanded over the years to
    include information on other options, including a section that explains
    the pros and cons of dynamo systems at
    "http://nordicgroup.us/s78/dynamo.html".

    You might want to add this link to your website, it is full of information
    about LED related components and devices, some of which which may be
    directly used on a bicycle or converted to bicycle use. There are also HID
    and fluorescent related articles.

    http://ledmuseum.home.att.net/

    Uh, I don't think I'll link to it. All sorts of browser warnings come
    up, and the site is even more amateurish than my own!

  7. SMS said:
    Prisoner at War said:

    Not sure how I'd prevent their being blinded, anyway: I couldn't
    predict it, could I? But I'm sure the two HIDs I'm considering have
    some kind of optics which should mitigate such circumstances. They
    better, anyway, for $600!!!

    In reality, the optics on the higher end bicycle lights are excellent.
    It's not a wild unfocused beam such as on the old 2 D cell battery
    headlights of the olden days. The quartz-halogen lights are typically
    using MR lamps, which are very good optics with matched, mirrored
    reflectors.

    The optics of MR lamps are excellent for their primary intended use:
    track lighting, to properly display paintings on walls, or to give
    supplemental or decorative lighting inside houses and buildings. For
    those applications, you want a soft, even, radially symmetrical beam
    pattern.

    The optics required for road use are entirely different. Park your
    car in front of a wall and examine the shape of the headlight beams on
    the wall. Rather than a radially symmetrical beam, you have a
    precisely tailored beam shape. The most notable feature is the
    horizontal cut-off plane, with bright light below that plane (to land
    on the road) and dimmer light above that plane (to prevent blinding of
    other road users). There are legal requirements - at least, in many
    countries - governing the shape of the beam.

    Quoted message said:

    Most bicycle and motorcycle HID lamps also use MR11 and MR16 type lamps,
    as it's become the super-standard for high-end lighting.

    AFAIK, motorcycles are subject to the same legal beam requirements as
    other motor vehicles. Certainly, my BMW has a beam shape that's
    tailored as precisely as my car's lights. I seriously doubt any
    radially symmetrical HID lamps are used as original equipment on
    motorcycles, but I'm willing to look at properly cited evidence to the
    contrary.

    Now it's true that aftermarket light sets have no road-tailored
    optics. Those are the ones installed by irresponsible hot-rodders,
    the ones that blind oncoming traffic.

    Quoted message said:


    One of the big advantages of the MR system is that the bulb is aligned
    precisely with the reflector at the factory. One problem with the lamps
    where you replace the actual bulb is that you have to align the bulb by
    trial and error (not even possible on the cheap lamps with threaded
    bulbs, and a hassle on the higher end lamps with a bulb that can be
    rotated for proper alignment).

    Statements like that make me wonder about SMS's experience with
    lights!

    Bike generator headlights use flange-mount bulbs. The flange-to-
    filament distance is precisely controlled. When replacing a bulb, the
    flange sits against a precisely placed shoulder. The shoulder has a
    protrusion, and the flange has a matching notch, so the bulb fits only
    in it's precise orientation. No trial and error is necessary. In
    fact, it's not even possible!

    Quoted message said:

    You really have to look at them to evaluate them. Do any have a metal
    mounting bracket to the bike? How rugged is the wiring and the switches?
    How much will battery replacement cost? How much is a replacement
    lamp? Most of these systems use the MR11 Welch Allyn HID lamp, which
    costs close to $90, and you definitely want to have a spare.

    IOW, add $90 onto the already exorbitant cost of the HID set you're
    considering.

    Through all this, I think it's good to remember that motorcycles
    travel legally up to 75 mph. Their headlights are designed for such
    speeds.

    Using that light output for a bicycle is as inappropriate as using
    motorcycle wheels on a bicycle.

    - Frank Krygowski

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.